Engaging pregnant individuals and healthcare professionals in an international mixed methods study to develop a core outcome set for studies on placenta accreta spectrum disorder (COPAS): a study protocol

被引:1
作者
O'Rinn, Susan E. [1 ,2 ]
Barrett, Jon F. R. [3 ]
Parsons, Janet A. [4 ,5 ]
Kingdom, John C. [6 ]
D'Souza, Rohan [3 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Outcomes & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook Res Inst, DAN Women & Babies Program, Evaluat Clin Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Phys Therapy, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Unity Hlth Toronto, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Appl Hlth Res Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] McMaster Univ, Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
Maternal medicine; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; Blood bank & transfusion medicine; ABNORMALLY INVASIVE PLACENTA; PREVIA-ACCRETA; RISK-FACTORS; MANAGEMENT; INCRETA; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060699
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorder is a life-threatening condition that may result in serious maternal complications, including mortality. The placenta which is pathologically adherent to the uterine wall, places individuals at high risk of major haemorrhage during the third stage of labour. Current research reports on PAS disorder outcomes have highly variable levels of information, which is therefore difficult for investigators to aggregate to inform practice. There is an urgent need to harmonise data collection in prospective studies to identify and implement best practices for management. One approach to standardise outcomes across any health area via the use of core outcome sets (COSs), which are consensus-derived standardised sets of outcomes that all studies for a particular condition should measure and report. This protocol outlines the steps for developing a COS for PAS disorder (COPAS). Methods and analysis This protocol outlines steps for the creation of COPAS. The first step, a systematic review, will identify all reported outcomes in the scientific literature. The second step will use qualitative one-on-one interviews to identify additional outcomes identified as important by patients and healthcare professionals that are not reported in the published literature. Outcomes from the first two steps will be combined to form an outcome inventory. This outcome inventory will inform the third step which is a Delphi survey that encourages agreement between patients and healthcare professionals on which outcomes are most important for inclusion in the COS. The fourth step, a consensus group meeting of representative participants, will finalise outcomes for inclusion in the PAS disorder COS. Ethics and dissemination This study has obtained Research Ethics Board approval from Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (#2338, #1488). We will aim to publish the study findings in an international peer-reviewed OBGYN journal. Registration details COMET Core Outcome Set Registration: https://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/1127. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020173426.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 55 条
[41]   Association of Preferences for Participation in Decision-making With Care Satisfaction Among Hospitalized Patients [J].
Ruhnke, Gregory W. ;
Tak, Hyo Jung ;
Meltzer, David O. .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (10)
[42]   Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries [J].
Silver, Robert M. ;
Landon, Mark B. ;
Rouse, Dwight J. ;
Leveno, Kenneth J. ;
Spong, Catherine Y. ;
Thom, Elizabeth A. ;
Moawad, Atef H. ;
Caritis, Steve N. ;
Harper, Margaret ;
Wapner, Ronald J. ;
Sorokin, Yoram ;
Miodovnik, Menachem ;
Carpenter, Marshall ;
Peaceman, Alan M. ;
O'Sullivan, Mary J. ;
Sibai, Baha ;
Langer, Oded ;
Thorp, John M. ;
Ramin, Susan M. ;
Mercer, Brian M. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 107 (06) :1226-1232
[43]   Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Future Based on a Systematic Review of Existing Studies [J].
Sinha, Ian P. ;
Smyth, Rosalind L. ;
Williamson, Paula R. .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2011, 8 (01)
[44]   The practice of acupuncture and moxibustion to promote cephalic version for women with a breech presentation: Implications for clinical practice and research [J].
Smith, C. A. ;
Betts, D. .
COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE, 2014, 22 (01) :75-80
[45]   Maternal outcome after conservative management of abnormally invasive placenta [J].
Su, Hsiu-Wei ;
Yi, Yu-Chiao ;
Tseng, Jenn-Jhy ;
Chen, Wei-Chih ;
Chen, Ya-Fang ;
Kung, Hsiao-Fan ;
Chou, Min-Min .
TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 56 (03) :353-357
[46]   Qualitative Quality: Eight "Big-Tent" Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research [J].
Tracy, Sarah J. .
QUALITATIVE INQUIRY, 2010, 16 (10) :837-851
[47]   OMERACT: An international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology [J].
Tugwell, Peter ;
Boers, Maarten ;
Brooks, Peter ;
Simon, Lee ;
Strand, Vibeke ;
Idzerda, Leanne .
TRIALS, 2007, 8 (1)
[48]   Placenta previa-accreta: Risk factors and complications [J].
Usta, IM ;
Hobeika, EM ;
Abu Musa, AA ;
Gabriel, GE ;
Nassar, AH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (03) :1045-1049
[49]   A Core Outcome Set for Evaluation of Interventions to Prevent Preterm Birth [J].
van 't Hooft, Janneke ;
Duffy, James M. N. ;
Daly, Mandy ;
Williamson, Paula R. ;
Meher, Shireen ;
Thom, Elizabeth ;
Saade, George R. ;
Alfirevic, Zarko ;
Mol, Ben Willem J. ;
Khan, Khalid S. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 127 (01) :49-58
[50]  
Walker MG, 2013, J OBSTET GYNAECOL CA, V35, P417, DOI 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30932-4