Dosimetric impact of applying a model-based dose calculation algorithm for skin cancer brachytherapy (interventional radiotherapy)

被引:5
|
作者
Placidi, Elisa [1 ]
Fionda, Bruno [2 ]
Rosa, Enrico [3 ]
Lancellotta, Valentina [2 ]
Napolitano, Antonio [4 ]
De Angeli, Martina [2 ]
Pastore, Francesco [2 ]
Gambacorta, Maria Antonietta [2 ,5 ]
Indovina, Luca [1 ]
Tagliaferri, Luca [2 ]
De Spirito, Marco [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS, Fdn Policlin Univ Agostino Gemelli, Dipartimento Diagnost Immagini Radioterapia Oncol, UOC Fis Sci Vita, Rome, Italy
[2] Fdn Policlin Univ Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Diagnost Immagini Radioterapia Oncol, UOC Radioterapia Oncol, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Ist Fis, Largo Francesco Vito 1, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[4] IRCCS Bambino Gesu Childrens Hosp, Dept Med Phys, Rome, Italy
[5] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Ist Radiol, Rome, Italy
关键词
brachytherapy; TG-43; interventional radiotherapy; TG-186; non-melanoma skin cancer; NASAL VESTIBULE; RECOMMENDATIONS; TG-43;
D O I
10.5114/jcb.2023.134173
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Brachytherapy (BT, interventional radiotherapy) is a well-established radiotherapy technique capable of delivering high doses to tumors while sparing organs at risk (OARs). Currently, the clinically accepted dose calculation algorithm used is TG-43. In the TG-186 report, new model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCA), such as Elekta's advanced collapsed cone engine (ACE), have been introduced, although their clinical application is yet to be fully realized. This study aimed to investigate two aspects of TG-186: firstly, a comparison of dose distributions calculated with TG-43 and TG-186 for skin tumors; and secondly, an exploration of the impact of using a water bolus on the coverage of clinical target volume (CTV) and OARs. Material and methods: Ten treatment plans for high-dose-rate IRT were developed. All plans were initially calculated using the TG-43 algorithm, and were subsequently re-calculated with TG-186. In addition, one of the treatment plans was assessed with both TG-43 and TG-186, using 10 different water bolus thicknesses ranging from 0 to 5 cm. To assess dose variations, the following dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters were compared: D2cc and D0.01cc Results and conclusions: The average dosimetric results for CTV and OARs, as calculated by both algorithms, revealed statistically significant lower values for TG-186 when compared with TG-43. The presence of a bolus was observed to enhance CTV coverage for the TG-186 algorithm, with a bolus thickness of 2 cm being the point at which ACE calculations matched those of TG-43. This study identified significant differences in dosimetric parameters for skin tumors when comparing the TG-43 and TG-186 algorithms. Moreover, it was demonstrated that the inclusion of a water bolus increased CTV coverage in TG-186 calculations.
引用
收藏
页码:448 / 452
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dosimetric impact of a model-based dose calculation algorithm in skin interventional radiotherapy
    Placidi, Elisa
    Fionda, Bruno
    Rosa, Enrico
    Lancellotta, Valentina
    Napolitano, Antonio
    De Angeli, Martina
    Pastore, Francesco
    Gambacorta, Maria Antonietta
    Indovina, Luca
    Tagliaferri, Luca
    De Spirito, Marco
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S378 - S380
  • [2] Dosimetric impact of a model based algorithm for skin cancer interventional radiotherapy
    Placidi, E.
    Napolitano, A.
    Fionda, B.
    Stimato, G.
    Lancellotta, V.
    Teodoli, S.
    Casa, C.
    Greco, F.
    Cornacchione, P.
    Menna, S.
    Meffe, G.
    Gambacorta, M. A.
    Tagliaferri, L.
    Indovina, L.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 158 : S187 - S188
  • [3] Dosimetric Impact of Air Pockets in the Vaginal Cuff Brachytherapy Using Model-based Dose Calculation Algorithm
    Puriparthi, Lakshmi Venkataramana
    Talluri, Anil Kumar
    Akkineni, Naga Prasanthi
    Bajwa, Harjot Kaur
    Tumu, Venkatappa Rao
    Sresty, N. V. N. Madhusudhana
    Alluri, Krishnam Raju
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 48 (04) : 373 - 377
  • [4] A review of dosimetric impact of implementation of model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) for HDR brachytherapy
    Yousif, Yousif A. M.
    Osman, Alexander F., I
    Halato, Mohammed A.
    PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2021, 44 (03) : 871 - 886
  • [5] Impact of a commercially available model-based dose calculation algorithm on treatment planning of high-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with cervical cancer
    Abe, Kota
    Kadoya, Noriyuki
    Sato, Shinya
    Hashimoto, Shimpei
    Nakajima, Yujiro
    Miyasaka, Yuya
    Ito, Kengo
    Umezawa, Rei
    Yamamoto, Takaya
    Takahashi, Noriyoshi
    Takeda, Ken
    Jingu, Keiichi
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2018, 59 (02) : 198 - 206
  • [6] The dosimetric accuracy of a commercial model-based dose calculation algorithm in modeling a six-groove direction modulated brachytherapy tandem applicator
    Meftahi, Moeen
    Song, William Y.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2024, 69 (21)
  • [7] Clinical transition to model-based dose calculation algorithm: A retrospective analysis of high-dose-rate tandem and ring brachytherapy of the cervix
    Jacob, Dayee
    Lamberto, Melissa
    Lawrence, Lana DeSouza
    Mourtada, Firas
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2017, 16 (03) : 624 - 629
  • [8] Effect of model-based dose-calculation algorithms in high dose rate brachytherapy of cervical carcinoma
    Srivastava, Shraddha
    Venugopal, Ajay Kannathuparambil
    Singh, Moirangthem Nara
    REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2024, 29 (03) : 300 - 308
  • [9] Deployment and performance of model-based dose calculation algorithm in 192Ir shielded cylinder brachytherapy
    Tien, Christopher J.
    Chen, Zhe
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2019, 18 (06) : 883 - 889
  • [10] Retrospective Dosimetric Comparison of HDR Interventional Radiotherapy (Brachytherapy) Versus Planning with VMAT and Electron Beam Therapy for Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer Treatment
    Placidi, Elisa
    Fionda, Bruno
    Rosa, Enrico
    Lancellotta, Valentina
    Napolitano, Antonio
    De Angeli, Martina
    Ciasca, Gabriele
    Pastore, Francesco
    Gambacorta, Maria Antonietta
    Tagliaferri, Luca
    De Spirito, Marco
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (22):