Multimodal language in child-directed versus adult-directed speech

被引:3
作者
Kandemir, Songul [1 ]
Ozer, Demet [1 ]
Aktan-Erciyes, Asli [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Kadir Has Univ, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Kadir Has Univ, TR-34083 Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Audience design; multimodal language; adult-directed speech; child-directed speech; CONVERSATIONAL HAND GESTURES; RECIPIENT DESIGN; OLDER-ADULTS; COMMUNICATION; MOTHERESE; SPEAKERS; RECALL; PREFERENCE; SPEAKING; YOUNGER;
D O I
10.1177/17470218231188832
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Speakers design their multimodal communication according to the needs and knowledge of their interlocutors, phenomenon known as audience design. We use more sophisticated language (e.g., longer sentences with complex grammatical forms) when communicating with adults compared with children. This study investigates how speech and co-speech gestures change in adult-directed speech (ADS) versus child-directed speech (CDS) for three different tasks. Overall, 66 adult participants (M-age = 21.05, 60 female) completed three different tasks (story-reading, storytelling and address description) and they were instructed to pretend to communicate with a child (CDS) or an adult (ADS). We hypothesised that participants would use more complex language, more beat gestures, and less iconic gestures in the ADS compared with the CDS. Results showed that, for CDS, participants used more iconic gestures in the story-reading task and storytelling task compared with ADS. However, participants used more beat gestures in the storytelling task for ADS than CDS. In addition, language complexity did not differ across conditions. Our findings indicate that how speakers employ different types of gestures (iconic vs beat) according to the addressee's needs and across different tasks. Speakers might prefer to use more iconic gestures with children than adults. Results are discussed according to audience design theory.
引用
收藏
页码:716 / 728
页数:13
相关论文
共 84 条
[41]   Do Iconic Hand Gestures Really Contribute to the Communication of Semantic Information in a Face-to-Face Context? [J].
Holler, Judith ;
Shovelton, Heather ;
Beattie, Geoffrey .
JOURNAL OF NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR, 2009, 33 (02) :73-88
[42]   Communicating common ground: How mutually shared knowledge influences speech and gesture in a narrative task [J].
Holler, Judith ;
Wilkin, Katie .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 2009, 24 (02) :267-289
[43]   When do speakers take into account common ground? [J].
Horton, WS ;
Keysar, B .
COGNITION, 1996, 59 (01) :91-117
[44]   I see it in my hands' eye: Representational gestures reflect conceptual demands [J].
Hostetter, Autumn B. ;
Alibali, Martha W. ;
Kita, Sotaro .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 2007, 22 (03) :313-336
[45]   When Do Gestures Communicate? A Meta-Analysis [J].
Hostetter, Autumn B. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2011, 137 (02) :297-315
[46]  
Hyusein G., 2023, PLOS ONE, V18
[47]   Beat gestures improve word recall in 3-to 5-year-old children [J].
Igualada, Alfonso ;
Esteve-Gibert, Nuria ;
Prieto, Pilar .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 156 :99-112
[48]   REFERENCES IN CONVERSATION BETWEEN EXPERTS AND NOVICES [J].
ISAACS, EA ;
CLARK, HH .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1987, 116 (01) :26-37
[49]   Gesturing in mother-child interactions [J].
Iverson, JM ;
Capirci, O ;
Longobardi, E ;
Caselli, MC .
COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 1999, 14 (01) :57-75
[50]   The role of conversational hand gestures in a narrative task [J].
Jacobs, Naomi ;
Garnham, Alan .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2007, 56 (02) :291-303