Midterm Outcomes of Muscle-Preserving Posterior Lumbar Decompression via Sagittal Splitting of the Spinous Process: Minimum 5-Year Follow-up

被引:4
作者
Son, Hee Jung [1 ]
Chang, Bong-Soon [2 ]
Chang, Sam Yeol [2 ]
Gimm, Geunwu [2 ]
Kim, Hyoungmin [2 ]
机构
[1] Eulji Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Nowon Eulji Med Ctr, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
关键词
Spinal stenosis; Spinous process splitting; Decompression; Mid-term outcomes; SPINAL STENOSIS; CANAL STENOSIS; LAMINECTOMY;
D O I
10.4055/cios22362
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: To overcome several disadvantages of conventional laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS), several types of minimally invasive surgery have been developed. The purpose of the present study was to report the clinical and radiological mid-term outcomes of spinous process-splitting decompression (SPSD) for DLSS. Methods: Seventy-three consecutive patients underwent SPSD between September 2014 and March 2016. Of these, 42 (70 segments) who had at least 5 years of follow-up were analyzed retrospectively. The visual analog scale for back pain and leg pain, Oswestry disability index, and walking distance without resting were scored to assess clinical outcomes at the preoperative and final follow-up. A subgroup analysis was performed according to the union status of the split spinous processes (SPs). For radiological outcomes, slip in the neutral position as a static parameter, anterior flexion-neutral translation, and posterior extension-neutral translation as a dynamic parameter were measured before and at the final follow-up after surgery. Spinopelvic parameters were also measured. Reoperation rate at the index levels was investigated, and predictive risk factors for reoperation were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. Survival analysis was performed with reoperation as the endpoint to estimate the longevity of the SPSD for DLSS. Results: All clinical outcomes improved significantly at the final follow-up compared to those at the initial visit (p < 0.05). The clinical outcomes did not differ according to the union status of the split SP. There were no cases of definite segmental instability and no significant changes in the static or dynamic parameters after surgery. Sacral slope and lumbar lordosis increased, and pelvic tilt decreased significantly at the follow-up (p < 0.05), despite no significant change in the sagittal vertical axis. The mean longevity of the procedure before the reoperation was 82.9 months. Five patients (11.9%) underwent reoperation at a mean of 52.2 months after the SPSD. There were no significant risk factors for reoperation; however, the preoperative severity of foraminal stenosis had an odds ratio of 7.556 (p = 0.064). Conclusions: SPSD for DLSS showed favorable clinical and radiological outcomes at the mid-term follow-up. SPSD could be a good surgical option for treating DLSS.
引用
收藏
页码:800 / 808
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Radiographic predictors of delayed instability following decompression without fusion for degenerative Grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis Clinical article
    Blumenthal, Claire
    Curran, Jill
    Benzel, Edward C.
    Potter, Rachel
    Magge, Subu N.
    Harrington, J. Frederick, Jr.
    Coumans, Jean-Valery
    Ghogawala, Zoher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2013, 18 (04) : 340 - 346
  • [2] Split-spinous process laminotomy and discectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a preliminary report
    Cho, Der-Yang
    Lin, Hung-Lin
    Lee, Wen-Yuan
    Lee, Han-Chung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2007, 6 (03) : 229 - 239
  • [3] How I do it? Biportal endoscopic spinal surgery (BESS) for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis
    Choi, Chang Myong
    Chung, Je Tea
    Lee, Sang Jin
    Choi, Dae Jung
    [J]. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2016, 158 (03) : 459 - 463
  • [4] Revision Surgery Following Operations for Lumbar Stenosis
    Deyo, Richard A.
    Martin, Brook I.
    Kreuter, William
    Jarvik, Jeffrey G.
    Angier, Heather
    Mirza, Sohail K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2011, 93A (21) : 1979 - 1986
  • [5] RADIOLOGIC-DIAGNOSIS OF DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SPINAL INSTABILITY
    DUPUIS, PR
    YONGHING, K
    CASSIDY, JD
    KIRKALDYWILLIS, WH
    [J]. SPINE, 1985, 10 (03) : 262 - 276
  • [6] Risk Factors for Reoperation in Patients Treated Surgically for Lumbar Stenosis A Subanalysis of the 8-year Data From the SPORT Trial
    Gerling, Michael C.
    Leven, Dante
    Passias, Peter G.
    Lafage, Virginie
    Bianco, Kristina
    Lee, Alexandra
    Lurie, Jon D.
    Tosteson, Tor D.
    Zhao, Wenyan
    Spratt, Kevin F.
    Radcliff, Kristen
    Errico, Thomas J.
    [J]. SPINE, 2016, 41 (10) : 901 - 909
  • [7] KINEMATICS OF THE WHOLE LUMBAR SPINE - EFFECT OF DISCECTOMY
    GOEL, VK
    GOYAL, S
    CLARK, C
    NISHIYAMA, K
    NYE, T
    [J]. SPINE, 1985, 10 (06) : 543 - 554
  • [8] Muscle-Preserving Interlaminar Decompression for the Lumbar Spine A Minimally Invasive New Procedure for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis
    Hatta, Yoichiro
    Shiraishi, Tateru
    Sakamoto, Atsuto
    Yato, Yoshiyuki
    Harada, Tomohisa
    Mikami, Yasuo
    Hase, Hitoshi
    Kubo, Toshikazu
    [J]. SPINE, 2009, 34 (08) : E276 - E280
  • [9] Hwang Hee-Jong, 2016, Korean J Spine, V13, P183, DOI 10.14245/kjs.2016.13.4.183
  • [10] Preoperative retrolisthesis as a predictive risk factor of reoperation due to delayed-onset symptomatic foraminal stenosis after central decompression for lumbar canal stenosis without fusion
    Ikegami, Daisuke
    Hosono, Noboru
    Mukai, Yoshihiro
    Tateishi, Kosuke
    Fuji, Takeshi
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 17 (08) : 1066 - 1073