Evaluation of headland turning types of adjacent parallel paths for combine harvesters

被引:20
作者
Chen, Tiaotiao [1 ]
Xu, Lizhang [1 ]
Ahn, Ho Seok [2 ]
Lu, En [1 ]
Liu, Yanbin [1 ]
Xu, Rongjin [3 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Agr Engn, Key Lab Theory & Technol Intelligent Agr Machinery, Minist Educ, Zhenjiang 212013, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Auckland, Fac Engn, Dept Elect Comp & Software Engn, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
[3] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Zhenjiang 212013, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Unmanned combine harvester; Path planning; Headland turning; Turning radius; FIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2023.07.009
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Path planning is a critical aspect of the harvesting process for unmanned combine har-vesters, and the headland turning paths play a crucial role in connecting two parallel paths. However, previous studies have often simplified the combine harvester as a mass point, leading to suboptimal or meaningless planned paths. In this paper, a simplified geometrical model for a tracked combine harvester that considers the influence of the header and tracks on headland turning was developed. Using this model, new calculation formulae for path length, turning time, and headland width for four commonly used headland turning types: fishtail turn, bulb turn, semicircle turn, and u turn were deduced and deeply analysed. The results revealed that the semicircle turn achieved the greatest reduction in path length, turning time, and headland width, reaching up to 79.0%, 74.0%, and 36.1%, respectively, if the harvester turned to the left. To ensure sufficient turning area for unmanned harvesting, the field periphery should be cut at least twice for u turns, three times for semicircle turns, three to four times for fishtail turns, and three to five times for bulb turns. It is suggested that the semicircle turn is the preferred option for most situa-tions, and the harvester should switch between the semicircle turn and the u turn in special cases if it has a differential steering function. This approach can significantly improve working efficiency and always determine the minimum required headland width.& COPY; 2023 IAgrE. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 113
页数:21
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Internet-of-Things (IoT)-Based Smart Agriculture: Toward Making the Fields Talk [J].
Ayaz, Muhammad ;
Ammad-Uddin, Mohammad ;
Sharif, Zubair ;
Mansour, Ali ;
Aggoune, El-Hadi M. .
IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 :129551-129583
[2]   Route planning for orchard operations [J].
Bochtis, D. ;
Griepentrog, H. W. ;
Vougioukas, S. ;
Busato, P. ;
Berruto, R. ;
Zhou, K. .
COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2015, 113 :51-60
[3]   Mobile Robot Trajectory Planning Under Kinematic and Dynamic Constraints for Partial and Full Field Coverage [J].
Cariou, Christophe ;
Gobor, Zoltan ;
Seiferth, Benjamin ;
Berducat, Michel .
JOURNAL OF FIELD ROBOTICS, 2017, 34 (07) :1297-1312
[4]  
[陈凯 Chen Kai], 2022, [农业机械学报, Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery], V53, P17
[5]   Mix-opt: A new route operator for optimal coverage path planning for a fleet in an agricultural environment [J].
Conesa-Munoz, Jesus ;
Pajares, Gonzalo ;
Ribeiro, Angela .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2016, 54 :364-378
[6]  
Cong W., 2017, Geographical characteristics of field in southern China and its impact mechanism on operation efficiency of harvesters
[7]   Route planning evaluation of a prototype optimised infield route planner for neutral material flow agricultural operations [J].
Edwards, Gareth T. C. ;
Hinge, Jorgen ;
Skou-Nielsen, Nick ;
Villa-Henriksen, Andres ;
Sorensen, Claus Aage Gron ;
Green, Ole .
BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2017, 153 :149-157
[8]   Advanced Computational Methods for Agriculture Machinery Movement Optimization with Applications in Sugarcane Production [J].
Filip, Martin ;
Zoubek, Tomas ;
Bumbalek, Roman ;
Cerny, Pavel ;
Batista, Carlos E. ;
Olsan, Pavel ;
Bartos, Petr ;
Kriz, Pavel ;
Xiao, Maohua ;
Dolan, Antonin ;
Findura, Pavol .
AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2020, 10 (10) :1-20
[9]  
[关卓怀 Guan Zhuohuai], 2020, [农业工程学报, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering], V36, P29
[10]   Side-to-side 3D coverage path planning approach for agricultural robots to minimize skip/overlap areas between swaths [J].
Hameed, I. A. ;
la Cour-Harbo, A. ;
Osen, O. L. .
ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, 2016, 76 :36-45