Comparison of Computed Tomography-Based Artificial Intelligence Modeling and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosis of Cholesteatoma

被引:4
|
作者
Eroglu, Orkun [1 ]
Eroglu, Yesim [2 ]
Yildirim, Muhammed [3 ]
Karlidag, Turgut [1 ]
Cinar, Ahmet [4 ]
Akyigit, Abdulvahap [1 ]
Kaygusuz, Irfan [1 ]
Yildirim, Hanefi [2 ]
Keles, Erol [1 ]
Yalcin, Sinasi [1 ]
机构
[1] Firat Univ, Sch Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Elazig, Turkiye
[2] Firat Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Elazig, Turkiye
[3] Malatya Turgut Ozal Univ, Fac Engn & Nat Sci, Dept Comp Engn, Malatya, Turkiye
[4] Firat Univ, Sch Engn, Dept Comp Engn, Elazig, Turkiye
关键词
Chronic otitis media; cholesteatoma; artificial intelligence; deep learning; CT; MRI; MIDDLE-EAR; CANAL WALL; MRI;
D O I
10.5152/iao.2023.221004
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to compare the success rates of computed tomography image-based artificial intelligence models and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of preoperative cholesteatoma. METHODS: The files of 75 patients who underwent tympanomastoid surgery with the diagnosis of chronic otitis media between January 2010 and January 2021 in our clinic were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were classified into the chronic otitis group without cholesteatoma (n = 34) and the chronic otitis group with cholesteatoma (n = 41) according to the presence of cholesteatoma at surgery. A dataset was created from the preoperative computed tomography images of the patients. In this dataset, the success rates of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma were determined by using the most frequently used artificial intelligence models in the literature. In addition, preoperative MRI were evaluated and the success rates were compared. RESULTS: Among the artificial intelligence architectures used in the paper, the lowest result was obtained in MobileNetV2 with an accuracy of 83.30%, while the highest result was obtained in DenseNet201 with an accuracy of 90.99%. In our paper, the specificity of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma was 88.23% and the sensitivity was 87.80%. CONCLUSION: In this study, we showed that artificial intelligence can be used with similar reliability to magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma. This is the first study that, to our knowledge, compares magnetic resonance imaging with artificial intelligence models for the purpose of identifying preoperative cholesteatomas.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 349
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Cerebral Paragonimiasis in Children
    Du, Jinhui
    Liu, Likun
    Fan, Haiqing
    Yu, Yue
    Luo, Yilin
    Yu, Hui
    Liao, Xin
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [32] Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography and ultrasound for the diagnosis of female pelvic pathology
    John B. Harringa
    Rebecca L. Bracken
    B. Keegan Markhardt
    Timothy J. Ziemlewicz
    Meghan Lubner
    Arthur Chiu
    Jen Birstler
    Perry J. Pickhardt
    Scott B. Reeder
    Michael D. Repplinger
    Emergency Radiology, 2021, 28 : 789 - 796
  • [33] Magnetic Resonance Imaging Availability Reduces Computed Tomography Use for Pediatric Appendicitis Diagnosis
    James, Natasha C.
    Ahmadian, Rosstin
    Mckee, Jason Q.
    Sarangarm, Dusadee
    Bussmann, Silas C.
    Williamson, Susan
    Upham, Bryan D.
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2022, 38 (01) : E219 - E224
  • [34] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based versus Computed Tomography-Based Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Comparison of Safety and Efficacy within a Cohort Study
    Gerischer, Lea Morrin
    Fiebach, Jochen B.
    Scheitz, Jan F.
    Audebert, Heinrich J.
    Endres, Matthias
    Nolte, Christian H.
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2013, 35 (03) : 250 - 256
  • [35] Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography and ultrasound for the diagnosis of female pelvic pathology
    Harringa, John B.
    Bracken, Rebecca L.
    Markhardt, B. Keegan
    Ziemlewicz, Timothy J.
    Lubner, Meghan
    Chiu, Arthur
    Birstler, Jen
    Pickhardt, Perry J.
    Reeder, Scott B.
    Repplinger, Michael D.
    EMERGENCY RADIOLOGY, 2021, 28 (04) : 789 - 796
  • [36] Determinants of the diffusion of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
    Oh, EH
    Imanaka, Y
    Evans, E
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2005, 21 (01) : 73 - 80
  • [37] The utility of computed tomography and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging fusion in cholesteatoma: illustration with a UK case series
    Hall, A.
    St Leger, D.
    Singh, A.
    Lingam, R. K.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2020, 134 (02) : 178 - 183
  • [38] Fusion of Computed Tomography and PROPELLER Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection and Localization of Middle Ear Cholesteatoma
    Locketz, Garrett D.
    Li, Peter M. M. C.
    Fischbein, Nancy J.
    Holdsworth, Samantha J.
    Blevins, Nikolas H.
    JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2016, 142 (10) : 947 - 953
  • [39] The automatic diagnosis artificial intelligence system for preoperative magnetic resonance imaging of uterine sarcoma
    Toyohara, Yusuke
    Sone, Kenbun
    Noda, Katsuhiko
    Yoshida, Kaname
    Kato, Shimpei
    Kaiume, Masafumi
    Taguchi, Ayumi
    Kurokawa, Ryo
    Osuga, Yutaka
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 35 (03)
  • [40] Indeterminate Liver and Renal Lesions: Comparison of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Providing a Definitive Diagnosis and Impact on Recommendations for Additional Imaging
    Margolis, Nathaniel E.
    Shaver, Christine M.
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2013, 37 (06) : 882 - 886