Non-Papillary Access for the Percutaneous Antegrade Treatment of Renal and Ureteral Stones

被引:1
作者
Tsaturyan, Arman
Boviatsis, Vasileios
Peteinaris, Angelis
Adamou, Constantinos
Pagonis, Konstantinos
Natsos, Anastasios
Vrettos, Theofanis
Liatsikos, Evangelos
Kallidonis, Panagiotis
机构
[1] Univ Patras, Dept Urol, Patras, Greece
[2] Univ Patras, Dept Anesthesiol, Patras, Greece
[3] Univ Patras, ICU, Patras, Greece
[4] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Urol, Vienna, Austria
[5] Sechenov Univ, Inst Urol & Reprod Hlth, Moscow, Russia
关键词
CLINICAL-RESEARCH OFFICE; STRICTURE FORMATION; RETROGRADE; URETEROLITHOTRIPSY; URETEROSCOPY; MANAGEMENT; CALCULI; NEPHROLITHOTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; PUNCTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.037
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility and success of medial non-papillary percutaneous access for the ante -grade treatment of different locations of ureteral stones, with and without concomitant renal stones.METHODS We performed an analysis of prospectively collected data of 72 patients, being subjected to percu-taneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy. Stones located anywhere in the ureter with or without con-comitant renal stones were included. A 12Fr, 22Fr, or 30Fr percutaneous tract dilation was performed based on the size of the stone pelvicalyceal system. Perioperative and demographic parameters were gathered and evaluated. The Lithoclast Trilogy (EMS Medical, Nyon, Switzer-land) High-power holmium laser devices Cyber Ho 150 (Quanta System, Samarate, Italy) or MOSES Pulse 120H (Lumenis Ltd, Yokneam, Israel) were used for lithotripsy.RESULTS The average age and cumulative stone size of the patients were 57.9 & PLUSMN; 27.1 years and 24.2 & PLUSMN; 5.4 mm, respectively. The mean manipulation time was 36.9 & PLUSMN; 14.8 minutes. The mean hospitali-zation time was 2.5 & PLUSMN; 0.5 days and the average hemoglobin loss was 1.02 & PLUSMN; 0.18 gr/dL. The stone-free rate after percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy was 95.8 % (69 patients), while the over-all complications rate was 5.6 %, with 3 cases of fever and one case of prolonged hematuria that were treated conservatively.CONCLUSION Non-papillary percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy is a safe and reliable technique for the treatment of patients with ureteral stones, with or without the co-existence of renal stones. A high stone-free rate of 95.8% was reported at 1-month after the surgery carrying a weighted risk of developing postoperative complications. UROLOGY 171: 71-76, 2023. & COPY; 2022 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 76
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   How well tolerated is supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy? [J].
Baard, Joyce ;
Kamphuis, Guido M. ;
Westendarp, Matias ;
de la Rosette, Jean J. M. C. H. .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2014, 24 (02) :184-188
[2]   Retrograde, Antegrade, and Laparoscopic Approaches for the Management of Large, Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Basiri, Abbas ;
Simforoosh, Nasser ;
Ziaee, Amirmohsen ;
Shayaninasab, Hamid ;
Moghaddam, Seyed Mohamad Mehdi Hosseini ;
Zare, Samad .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2008, 22 (12) :2677-2680
[3]   Minimally invasive surgical treatment for large impacted upper ureteral stones: Ureteroscopic lithotripsy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy? [J].
Bozkurt, Ibrahim Halil ;
Yonguc, Tarik ;
Arslan, Burak ;
Degirmenci, Tansu ;
Gunlusoy, Bulent ;
Aydogdu, Ozgu ;
Koras, Omer .
CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2015, 9 (3-4) :E122-E125
[4]   The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: Indications, Complications, and Outcomes in 5803 Patients [J].
de la Rosette, Jean ;
Assimos, Dean ;
Desai, Mahesh ;
Gutierrez, Jorge ;
Lingeman, James ;
Scarpa, Roberto ;
Tefekli, Ahmet .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (01) :11-17
[5]  
Dindo D, 2004, ANN SURG, V240, P205, DOI [10.17116/hirurgia2018090162, 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae]
[6]   Antegrade mini-percutaneous flexible ureteroscopy versus retrograde ureteroscopy for treating impacted proximal ureteric stones of 1-2 cm: A prospective randomised study [J].
Elgebaly, Omar ;
Abdeldayem, Hussein ;
Idris, Faisal ;
Elrifai, Alaa ;
Fahmy, Ahmed .
ARAB JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 18 (03) :176-180
[7]   Ureteral stricture formation after ureteroscope treatment of impacted calculi: A prospective study [J].
Fam, Xeng Inn ;
Singam, Praveen ;
Ho, Christopher Chee Kong ;
Sridharan, Radhika ;
Hod, Rozita ;
Bahadzor, Badrulhisham ;
Goh, Eng Hong ;
Tan, Guan Hee ;
Zainuddin, Zulkifli .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 56 (01) :63-67
[8]   Percutaneous antegrade removal of impacted upper-ureteral calculi: Still the treatment of choice in developing countries [J].
Goel, R ;
Aron, M ;
Kesarwani, PK ;
Dogra, PN ;
Hemal, AK ;
Gupta, NP .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2005, 19 (01) :54-57
[9]   Treatment of large impacted proximal ureteral stones: randomized comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy versus retrograde ureterolithotripsy [J].
Gu Xiao-jian ;
Lin, Lu Jian ;
Yan, Xu .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 31 (06) :1605-1610
[10]   Treatment for extended-mid and distal ureteral stones: SWL or ureteroscopy? Results of a multicenter study [J].
Hendrikx, AJM ;
Strijbos, WEM ;
De Knijff, DW ;
Kums, JJM ;
Doesburg, WH ;
Lemmens, WAJG .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1999, 13 (10) :727-733