Seismic Response of High-Rise Frame-Shear Wall Buildings under the Influence of Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction

被引:4
作者
Zhang, Xiaofeng [1 ]
Far, Harry [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney UTS, Fac Engn & Informat Technol, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Bldg 11,Level 11,POB 123, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
关键词
Frame-shear wall buildings; Soil-structure interaction; Interstory drifts; Base shear; Finite-element analysis; Skyscraper; Seismic response; BEHAVIOR; PERFORMANCE; FOUNDATION; ROCKING; DESIGN; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-8451
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Frame-shear wall buildings with multiple basements are the most commonly used structural form of high-rise buildings in the world today. In the traditional design method, structures are usually assumed as rigid base structures without considering soil-structure interaction (SSI), since incorporating the dynamic SSI tends to prolong natural periods and increase the damping of the system, which are considered beneficial for the seismic response of structures. However, recent studies exposed a potentially harmful aspect of SSI. In this study, a soil-foundation-structure model developed in finite-element software and verified by shaking table tests is used to critically investigate the influence of SSI on high-rise frame-shear wall structures with a series of superstructure and substructure parameters. The beneficial and detrimental impacts of SSI are identified and discussed. Numerical simulation results indicate the rise in the stiffness of subsoil can dramatically amplify the base shear of structures. As the foundation rotation increases, interstory drifts are increased and base shears are reduced. In general, SSI amplifies the interstory drifts showing detrimental effects of SSI. However, as for the base shear, SSI exerts detrimental effects on most piled foundation cases as well as classical compensated foundation structures founded on C-e soil, whereas for classical compensated foundation structures founded on soil types D-e and E-e, effects of SSI are beneficial since the base shear is reduced. Moreover, regarding structures with different foundation types, minimum base shear ratios considering the SSI reduction effect are presented.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Influence of Soil Stiffness on the Response of Piled Raft Foundations under Earthquake Loading [J].
Akbari, Ali ;
Eslami, Abolfazl ;
Nikookar, Mohammad .
TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE GEOTECHNOLOGY, 2021, 8 (04) :590-606
[2]   Study the seismic response of reinforced concrete high-rise building with dual framed-shear wall system considering the effect of soil structure interaction [J].
Al Agha, Wesam ;
Almorad, Waleed Alozzo ;
Umamaheswari, Nambiappan ;
Alhelwani, Amjad .
MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 43 :2182-2188
[3]   Seismic Soil-structure Interaction: A State-of-the-Art Review [J].
Anand, Vishwajit ;
Kumar, S. R. Satish .
STRUCTURES, 2018, 16 :317-326
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Abaqus Analysis User's Manual
[5]   Influence of foundation flexibility on seismic fragility of reinforced concrete high-rise buildings [J].
Ansari, Mojtaba ;
Nazari, Maryam ;
Panah, Ali Komak .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2021, 142
[6]  
AS (Australian Standards), 2018, Concrete structures
[7]  
AS (Australian Standards), 2007, STRUCTURAL DESIGN AC
[8]   Computational modelling of dynamic soil-structure interaction in shear wall buildings with basements in medium stiffness sandy soils using a subdomain spectral element approach calibrated by micro-vibrations [J].
Ayala, Felipe ;
Saez, Esteban ;
Magna-Verdugo, Carolina .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2022, 252
[9]   Effect of Seismic Soil-Pile-Structure Interaction on Mid- and High-Rise Steel Buildings Resting on a Group of Pile Foundations [J].
Bagheri, Mohsen ;
Jamkhaneh, Mehdi Ebadi ;
Samali, Bijan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2018, 18 (09)
[10]   Soil-structure interaction effects on the fundamental periods of the shear-wall dominant buildings [J].
Balkaya, Can ;
Yuksel, S. Bahadir ;
Derinoz, Okan .
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2012, 21 (06) :416-430