Treatment of peri-implant mucositis: Adjunctive effect of glycine powder air polishing to professional mechanical biofilm removal. 12 months randomized clinical study

被引:2
作者
Nicola, Discepoli [1 ]
Isabella, De Rubertis [1 ]
Carolina, Ciocci [1 ]
Baldini, Nicola [2 ]
Raffaele, Mirra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Siena, Dept Med Biotechnol, Unit Periodont, Viale Bracci 1, I-53100 Siena, Italy
[2] Univ Siena, Dept Med Biotechnol, Unit Oral Surg, Siena, Italy
关键词
dental implant; mucositis; prevention; CONSENSUS REPORT; PLAQUE REMOVAL; PERIODONTAL-DISEASES; KERATINIZED MUCOSA; PROSPECTIVE COHORT; RISK-FACTORS; GINGIVITIS; DEFINITIONS; PREVENTION; WORKSHOP;
D O I
10.1111/cid.13304
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: To evaluate the adjunctive effect of glycine-powder air-polishing (GPAP) to full-mouth ultrasonic debridement (Fm-UD) in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis, and to determine the impact of implant and patient-level variables for disease resolution. Methods: Individuals with a diagnosis of peri-implant mucositis were consecutively included in this randomized parallel arm clinical study. All the participants received a session of Fm-UD. Only implants allocated to the test group were additionally treated with GPAP. Clinical assessments were recorded at baseline, at 3 and at 12 months following intervention. The primary outcomes were complete disease resolution (DR1), defined as absence of bleeding sites at probing per implants, and partial disease resolution (DR2), measured as the presence of less than two bleeding sites at probing per implant. A final logistic multivariate regression model was built to evaluate the predictive role of implant and patient-level variables on DR. Results: Fifty two patients and 157 implants were included. Both groups displayed significant reduction in the extent of bleeding on probing and plaque levels. At 12 months, DR1 was achieved in 16% and 27% of participants for the test and the control group respectively. IDR1 was best predicted by the number of bleeding sites (OR = 2.7, p = 0.04) and the greatest PPD value (OR = 2.7, p = 0.05), while IDR2 by the prosthetic connection (OR = 2.59, p = 0.02), the mean PPD (OR = 2.23, p = 0.04), the FMBS (OR = 4.09, p = 0.04), and number of implants (OR = 4.59, p = 0.02). Conclusions: Despite significant improvements of clinical signs of peri-implant inflammation, the use of GPAP appears to have no adjunctive effect as compared with Fm-UD alone in the achievement of DR. Elevated initial levels of bleeding and PD predicted inferior likelihood of reaching disease resolution. The present randomized parallel arm clinical study was registered on and received the following registration number: NCT05801315. This clinical trial was not registered prior to participant recruitment and randomization ().
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 426
页数:12
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Effect of glycine powder air-polishing as an adjunct in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis: a pilot clinical trial
    Ji, Ying-Jie
    Tang, Zhi-Hui
    Wang, Ren
    Cao, Jie
    Cao, Cai-Fang
    Jin, Li-Jian
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (06) : 683 - 689
  • [2] Adjunctive effect of mouthrinse on treatment of peri-implant mucositis using mechanical debridement: A randomized clinical trial
    Philip, Juliana
    Laine, Marja L.
    Wismeijer, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2020, 47 (07) : 883 - 891
  • [3] Treatment of peri-implant mucositis using a glycine powder air-polishing or ultrasonic device: a randomized clinical trial
    Riben-Grundstrom, Caroline
    Norderyd, Ola
    Andre, Ulrika
    Renvert, Stefan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2015, 42 (05) : 462 - 469
  • [4] Evaluation of the adjunctive use of Er:YAG laser or erythritol powder air-polishing in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis: A randomized clinical trial
    Clementini, Marco
    Fabrizi, Simone
    Discepoli, Nicola
    Minoli, Margherita
    De Sanctis, Massimo
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 (11) : 1267 - 1277
  • [5] Adjunctive efficacy of diode laser in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis with mechanical therapy: A randomized clinical trial
    Aimetti, Mario
    Mariani, Giulia Maria
    Ferrarotti, Francesco
    Ercoli, Elena
    Liu, Chun Ching
    Romano, Federica
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (05) : 429 - 438
  • [6] Evaluation of adjunctive efficacy of diode laser in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis: a randomized clinical trial
    Tenore, Gianluca
    Montori, Alessandra
    Mohsen, Ahmed
    Mattarelli, Giovanni
    Palaia, Gaspare
    Romeo, Umberto
    LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 35 (06) : 1411 - 1417
  • [7] Evaluation of adjunctive efficacy of diode laser in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis: a randomized clinical trial
    Gianluca Tenore
    Alessandra Montori
    Ahmed Mohsen
    Giovanni Mattarelli
    Gaspare Palaia
    Umberto Romeo
    Lasers in Medical Science, 2020, 35 : 1411 - 1417
  • [8] Adjunctive efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of experimental peri-implant mucositis with mechanical and photodynamic therapy: a randomized, cross-over clinical trial
    Mongardini, Claudio
    Pilloni, Andrea
    Farina, Roberto
    Di Tanna, Gianluca
    Zeza, Blerina
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2017, 44 (04) : 410 - 417
  • [9] Evaluation of the effect of probiotics in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis: a triple-blind randomized clinical trial
    Pena, Marta
    Barallat, Lucia
    Vilarrasa, Javi
    Vicario, Monica
    Violant, Deborah
    Nart, Jose
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2019, 23 (04) : 1673 - 1683
  • [10] Artificial biofilm removal in a peri-implant mucositis model: Efficacy of air polishing technology as adjunct to ultrasonic debridement alone and impact of the site and the depth of mucosal tunnel-An in vitro study
    Discepoli, Nicola
    Mirra, Raffaele
    Vesentin, Cecilia
    Marruganti, Crystal
    Ferrari, Marco
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (02) : 242 - 250