Acknowledgments in Scientific Papers

被引:5
作者
Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A. [1 ]
Tsigaris, Panagiotis [2 ]
Vuong, Quan-Hoang [3 ]
机构
[1] Ikenobe 3011-2, Miki, Kagawa 7610799, Japan
[2] Thompson Rivers Univ, Dept Econ, Kamloops, BC V2C 0C8, Canada
[3] Phenikaa Univ, Ctr Interdisciplinary Social Res, Hanoi 100803, Vietnam
关键词
Accountability; Bias; Ethics; Conflict of interest; Editorial responsibility; Peer review; Post-publication peer review; Quality control; Transparency; FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGMENTS; SOCIAL-SCIENCES; AUTHORSHIP; COLLABORATION; COMMUNICATION; PATTERNS; ARTICLES; POLICIES; EDITORS; SPANISH;
D O I
10.1007/s12109-023-09955-z
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Acknowledgements are usually a minor part of scientific papers, but they serve a very important function. This section of the manuscript is normally reserved to thank those who offered assistance, but not enough to merit authorship, funders, or any other people or organizations or artificial intelligent tools that may have in any way been directly associated either with the research reported in that study, or with the published paper. Despite this, it is not uncommon to see wide disparities in ethics and author guidelines pertaining to acknowledgements, as was observed in 45 publishing-related entities (journals, publishers, preprints, ethics organizations, open access aggregators) that were assessed in this study. Greater standardization is required, especially among members of ethics policy groups such as the Committee on Publication Ethics or the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Moreover, even though verification is an essential step of this process, it is difficult to achieve.
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 299
页数:20
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond
    Allen, Christopher
    Mehler, David M. A.
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2019, 17 (05)
  • [2] Funding acknowledgments in the Web of Science: completeness and accuracy of collected data
    Alvarez-Bornstein, Belen
    Morillo, Fernanda
    Bordons, Maria
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2017, 112 (03) : 1793 - 1812
  • [3] Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies
    Baas, Jeroen
    Schotten, Michiel
    Plume, Andrew
    Cote, Gregoire
    Karimi, Reza
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE STUDIES, 2020, 1 (01): : 377 - 386
  • [5] How Scholars Credit Editors in Their Acknowledgements
    Brown, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING, 2009, 40 (04) : 384 - 398
  • [6] Burrough-Boenisch J., 2019, EUROPEAN SCI EDITING, V45, P32, DOI [10.20316/ESE.2019.45.18019, DOI 10.20316/ESE.2019.45.18019]
  • [7] Castelvecchi D., 2015, NATURE, V15, P17657, DOI [10.1038/nature.2015.17567, DOI 10.1038/NATURE.2015.17567]
  • [8] Bias against research on gender bias
    Cislak, Aleksandra
    Formanowicz, Magdalena
    Saguy, Tamar
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2018, 115 (01) : 189 - 200
  • [9] Approaching the "reward triangle": General analysis of the presence of funding acknowledgments and "peer interactive communication" in scientific publications
    Costas, Rodrigo
    van Leeuwen, Thed N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 63 (08): : 1647 - 1661
  • [10] A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy
    Cronin, B
    Shaw, D
    La Barre, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 54 (09): : 855 - 871