Sustainability Fingerprint-guiding companies in anticipating the sustainability direction in early design

被引:7
作者
Hallstedt, Sophie Isaksson [1 ]
Villamil, Carolina [1 ]
Lovdah, Josefin [1 ]
Nylander, Johanna Wallin [2 ]
机构
[1] Blekinge Inst Technol, Dept Strateg Sustainable Dev, SE-37179 Karlskrona, Sweden
[2] GKN Aerosp Engine, Trollhattan, Sweden
关键词
Ecodesign; Sustainable design; Measure; Sustainability; Early design; Sustainable product development; PRODUCT DESIGN; EARLY PHASES; LIFE-CYCLE; PERFORMANCE; FRAMEWORK; MODEL; INNOVATION; IMPLEMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.spc.2023.03.015
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
During the early phases of design of new products, information necessary to guide and assess sustainability is typically incomplete. Manufacturers risk discovering the unfavorable sustainability impact too late to redirect the development. The purpose of this study is to search and review methods to anticipate the sustainability performance of new products in the early stages of the innovation process, and, together with a case company in the aeroengine manufacturing business, to develop and propose a systematic approach to anticipate sustainability performance. Following a literature review of 51 methods and research-based proposals, only five covered the social-, ecological-, and economic sustainability dimensions in the early phases of product development. Through an action research-based approach, a qualitative sustainability measurement tool, the Sustainability Fingerprint tool, was developed. This tool allows the development team in a company to systematically derive a sustainability performance from a set of criteria unique to the targeted product and/or product portfolio that is to be designed, from a set of scientifically well-established sustainability principles. The tool was applied in six different industry cases at the company, by the design teams and independent of any influence of the researchers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to learn about the usefulness, usability, and applicability of the tool. It was concluded that the Sustainability Fingerprint tool has no equivalent in the literature and was considered useful for the case company during early phase design for two main reasons. Firstly, the tool is tailor-made with defined companyspecific sustainability criteria that represent the most important sustainability aspects to assess. Secondly, the support tool can be used also in later phases, thereby supporting a continued innovation process. It allows designers to anticipate a sustainability performance of the solution in: the development of sustainable innovations; comparison and down-selection of alternative solutions; sustainability assessments of the product portfolio to identify improvement measures; and sustainability assessment of current products to identify sustainability hotspots. Further research will include companies from other industrial sectors and will focus on adding digital support, improved practical instructions, and, integration to existing processes and established support tools in companies today. (c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Institution of Chemical Engineers. This is an open access
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 442
页数:19
相关论文
共 115 条
  • [1] Sustainability Assessment and Analysis of Malaysian Food Manufacturing Sector-A Move Towards Sustainable Development
    Ahmad, Shamraiz
    Wong, Kuan Yew
    Elahi, Hassan
    [J]. ADVANCED SCIENCE LETTERS, 2017, 23 (09) : 8942 - 8946
  • [2] Sustainable product design and development: A review of tools, applications and research prospects
    Ahmad, Shamraiz
    Wong, Kuan Yew
    Tseng, Ming Lang
    Wong, Wai Peng
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 132 : 49 - 61
  • [3] Sustainability assessment in the manufacturing industry: a review of recent studies
    Ahmad, Shamraiz
    Wong, Kuan Yew
    [J]. BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2018, 25 (08) : 3162 - 3179
  • [4] Sustainable machining approach for CAD/CAM/CNC systems based on a dynamic environmental assessment
    Andriankaja, Hery
    Le Duigou, Julien
    Danjou, Christophe
    Eynard, Benoit
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART B-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MANUFACTURE, 2017, 231 (13) : 2416 - 2429
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1992, The mechanical design process
  • [6] Arena Marika, 2009, International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management, V4, P207, DOI 10.1504/IJPLM.2009.031674
  • [7] Atiya H., 2017, DAAAM P, V1, P0911, DOI [10.2507/28th.daaam.proceedings.126, DOI 10.2507/28TH.DAAAM.PROCEEDINGS.126]
  • [8] Barni A, 2018, 2018 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (IS), P706, DOI 10.1109/IS.2018.8710554
  • [9] Corporate Sustainability Strategies: Sustainability Profiles and Maturity Levels
    Baumgartner, Rupert J.
    Ebner, Daniela
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 18 (02) : 76 - 89
  • [10] Benn S., 2018, Organizational change for corporate sustainability, V4th