Using the precaution adoption process model to understand decision-making about the COVID-19 booster vaccine in England

被引:7
作者
Meyer, Carly [1 ,5 ]
Goffe, Louis [2 ]
Antonopoulou, Vivi [1 ]
Graham, Fiona [2 ]
Tang, Mei Yee [2 ]
Lecouturier, Jan [2 ]
Grimani, Aikaterini [3 ]
Chadwick, Paul [1 ]
Sniehotta, Falko F. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Clin Educ & Hlth Psychol, NIHR Policy Res Unit Behav Sci, Hlth Psychol Res Grp, London, England
[2] Newcastle Univ, Populat Hlth Sci Inst, Fac Med Sci, NIHR Policy Res Unit Behav Sci, Newcastle upon Tyne, England
[3] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, NIHR Policy Res Unit Behav Sci, Behav Sci Grp, Coventry, England
[4] Heidelberg Univ, Ctr Prevent Med & Digital Hlth Baden Wuerttemberg, Dept Publ Hlth Prevent & Social Med, Heidelberg, Germany
[5] UCL, Ctr Behav Change, Dept Clin Educ & Hlth Psychol, 1-19 Torrington Pl, London WC1E 7HB, England
关键词
Coronavirus; Vaccine hesitancy; Booster vaccination; Precaution adoption process model; Health belief model; Theory of planned behaviour; UNITED-STATES; HESITANCY; ATTITUDES; INFLUENZA;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.02.047
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: COVID-19 continues to pose a threat to public health. Booster vaccine programmes are crit-ical to maintain population-level immunity. Stage theory models of health behaviour can help our under-standing of vaccine decision-making in the context of perceived threats of COVID-19. Purpose: To use the Precaution Adoption Process Model (PAPM) to understand decision-making about the COVID-19 booster vaccine (CBV) in England. Methods: An online, cross-sectional survey informed by the PAPM, the extended Theory of Planned Behaviour and Health Belief Model administered to people over the age of 50 residing in England, UK in October 2021. A multivariate, multinomial logistic regression model was used to examine associations with the different stages of CBV decision-making. Results: Of the total 2,004 participants: 135 (6.7%) were unengaged with the CBV programme; 262 (13.1%) were undecided as to whether to have a CBV; 31 (1.5%) had decided not to have a CBV; 1,415 (70.6%) had decided to have a CBV; and 161 (8.0%) had already had their CBV. Being unengaged was pos-itively associated with beliefs in their immune system to protect against COVID-19, being employed, and low household income; and negatively associated with CBV knowledge, a positive COVID-19 vaccine experience, subjective norms, anticipated regret of not having a CBV, and higher academic qualifications. Being undecided was positively associated with beliefs in their immune system and having previously received the Oxford/AstraZeneca (as opposed to Pfizer/BioNTech) vaccine; and negatively associated with CBV knowledge, positive attitudes regarding CBV, a positive COVID-19 vaccine experience, anticipated regret of not having a CBV, white British ethnicity, and living in East Midlands (vs London). Conclusions: Public health interventions promoting CBV may improve uptake through tailored messaging directed towards the specific decision stage relating to having a COVID-19 booster. (c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:2466 / 2475
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [21] Mabbott N, 2022, CONVERSATION OCT
  • [22] Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants
    MacDonald, Noni E.
    [J]. VACCINE, 2015, 33 (34) : 4161 - 4164
  • [23] Using Twitter for sentiment analysis towards AstraZeneca/Oxford, Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines
    Marcec, Robert
    Likic, Robert
    [J]. POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 98 (1161) : 544 - 550
  • [24] Vaccine side-effects and SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination in users of the COVID Symptom Study app in the UK: a prospective observational study
    Menni, Cristina
    Klaser, Kerstin
    May, Anna
    Polidori, Lorenzo
    Capdevila, Joan
    Louca, Panayiotis
    Sudre, Carole H.
    Nguyen, Long H.
    Drew, David A.
    Merino, Jordi
    Hu, Christina
    Selvachandran, Somesh
    Antonelli, Michela
    Murray, Benjamin
    Canas, Liane S.
    Molteni, Erika
    Graham, Mark S.
    Modat, Marc
    Joshi, Amit D.
    Mangino, Massimo
    Hammers, Alexander
    Goodman, Anna L.
    Chan, Andrew T.
    Wolf, Jonathan
    Steves, Claire J.
    Valdes, Ana M.
    Ourselin, Sebastien
    Spector, Tim D.
    [J]. LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 21 (07) : 939 - 949
  • [25] DEFINING AND MEASURING CREDIBILITY OF NEWSPAPERS - DEVELOPING AN INDEX
    MEYER, P
    [J]. JOURNALISM QUARTERLY, 1988, 65 (03): : 567 - +
  • [26] Michie S, 2011, IMPLEMENT SCI, V6, P42, DOI [DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42, 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42]
  • [27] Determinants of adults' intention to vaccinate against pandemic swine flu
    Myers, Lynn B.
    Goodwin, Robin
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 11
  • [28] Surveillance of Safety of 3 Doses of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination Using Electronic Health Records
    Niesen, Michiel J. M.
    Pawlowski, Colin
    O'Horo, John C.
    Challener, Doug W.
    Silvert, Eli
    Donadio, Greg
    Lenehan, Patrick J.
    Virk, Abinash
    Swift, Melanie D.
    Speicher, Leigh L.
    Gordon, Joel E.
    Geyer, Holly L.
    Halamka, John D.
    Venkatakrishnan, A. J.
    Soundararajan, Venky
    Badley, Andrew D.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (04) : E227038
  • [29] Office for National Statistics, 2022, COR COVID 19 LAT INS
  • [30] Office for National Statistics (ONS), 2021, COR VACC RAT PEOPL A