Environmental profile of 3D concrete printing technology in desert areas via life cycle assessment

被引:17
作者
Zhang, Ruo-Chen [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Li [1 ,2 ]
Xue, Xuan [1 ]
Ma, Guo-Wei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Univ Technol, Sch Civil & Transportat Engn, Tianjin 300401, Peoples R China
[2] Engn Res Ctr Construct 3D Printing Hebei, Tianjin 300401, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Life cycle assessment; 3D concrete printing; Environmental impact; Desert area construction; FABRICATION; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136412
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Three-dimensional concrete printing (3DCP) offers a particularly advantageous construction method in harsh environments, such as desert areas that experience shortages of building materials and labor. Evaluating the environmental impacts of 3DCP in remote areas is essential for substantification and thus practical application of this technology. Therefore, life cycle assessment against conventional construction was conducted in this study to determine the environmental profile of 3DCP in desert areas considering different reinforcement methods and aggregates. The comparison results indicate that 3DCP is more sustainable owing to its lower potential for freshwater ecotoxicity, particular matter formation, human toxicity, ozone depletion, and eutrophication. The environmental friendliness of using in-situ desert sand for 3DCP depends on the material delivery distance. Electricity consumption also influences the environmental impact of 3DCP. Although 3DCP is promising as an environmentally friendly construction method for use in remote areas, technological updates and energy supply adjustment and justification remain essential.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Potential benefits of digital fabrication for complex structures: Envitonmental assessment of a robotically fabricated concrete-wall [J].
Agusti-Juan, Isolda ;
Muller, Florian ;
Hack, Norman ;
Wangler, Timothy ;
Habert, Guillaume .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 154 :330-340
[3]   Environmental assessment of large-scale 3D printing in construction: A comparative study between cob and concrete [J].
Alhumayani, Hashem ;
Gomaa, Mohamed ;
Soebarto, Veronica ;
Jabi, Wassim .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 270
[4]   In-process reinforcing method: dual 3D printing procedure for ultra-high performance concrete reinforced cementitious composites [J].
Bai, Gang ;
Wang, Li ;
Wang, Fang ;
Ma, Guowei .
MATERIALS LETTERS, 2021, 304
[5]   3D printing eco-friendly concrete containing under-utilised and waste solids as aggregates [J].
Bai, Gang ;
Wang, Li ;
Ma, Guowei ;
Sanjayan, Jay ;
Bai, Mingke .
CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES, 2021, 120
[6]  
BP Statistical Review of World Energy, 2020, BP Statistical Review of World Energy
[7]   A review on Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Energy Assessment and Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Assessment on buildings [J].
Chau, C. K. ;
Leung, T. M. ;
Ng, W. Y. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 143 :395-413
[8]   Environmental impact of cement production: detail of the different processes and cement plant variability evaluation [J].
Chen, C. ;
Habert, G. ;
Bouzidi, Y. ;
Jullien, A. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2010, 18 (05) :478-485
[9]   SaltBlock as a 3D printed sustainable construction material in hot arid climates [J].
El-Mahdy, Deena ;
Gabr, Hisham S. ;
Abdelmohsen, Sherif .
JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2021, 43
[10]   Fabrication and durability testing of a 3D printed facade for desert climates [J].
Grassi, Giulia ;
Spagnolo, Sonia Lupica ;
Paoletti, Ingrid .
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2019, 28 :439-444