Predictive factors for vaginal delivery by induction of labor in uncomplicated pregnancies at 40-41 gestational weeks: A Japanese prospective single-center cohort study

被引:2
作者
Hosoya, Satoshi [1 ]
Maeda, Yuto [1 ]
Ogawa, Kohei [1 ]
Umehara, Nagayoshi [1 ]
Ozawa, Nobuaki [1 ]
Sago, Haruhiko [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Child Hlth & Dev, Ctr Maternal Fetal Neonatal & Reprod Med, Setagaya Ku, 2-10-1 Okura, Tokyo 1578535, Japan
关键词
cervical length measurement; labor induction; pregnancy; prospective cohort study; vaginal delivery; CESAREAN DELIVERY; CERVICAL LENGTH; NULLIPAROUS WOMEN; BISHOP SCORE; ULTRASOUND; SUCCESS; RISK; CATHETER; OUTCOMES; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1111/jog.15536
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim: We investigated cervical parameters predictive of vaginal delivery in elective labor induction among women at 40-41 gestational weeks. Methods: This Japanese prospective single-center cohort study was conducted between July 2019 and June 2020. We enrolled women with an uncomplicated singleton pregnancy who underwent labor induction at 40-41 gestational weeks. We analyzed background characteristics and cervical parameters, including Bishop score, cervical length, posterior cervical angle, and changes in cervical parameters before and after cervical dilatation. The endpoint was the rate of vaginal delivery. Results: Of 142 eligible participants, all 24 multiparous women underwent vaginal delivery. Among the nulliparous women (n = 118), the following categories showed significantly higher rates of vaginal delivery: Bishop scores of >= 6 before and after dilatation, compared with Bishop score < 6 (adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]; 1.58 [1.17-2.13] and 1.56 [1.13-2.14], respectively) and cervical length of < 10 and 10-20 mm before dilation, compared with cervical length of > 30 mm (aPR [95% CI]; 1.47 [1.00-2.15] and 2.13 [1.42-3.18], respectively). The posterior cervical angle and other background characteristics showed no significant associations. Furthermore, women with cervical lengths of >= 20 mm before and < 20 mm after dilatation showed a higher rate of vaginal delivery, compared to cervical length of >= 20 mm even after dilatation (aPR [95% CI]; 1.95 [1.19-3.20]). Conclusions High Bishop score, short cervical length, and changes in cervical length with dilatation are potential independent predictors of vaginal delivery following elective labor induction in nulliparous women at 40-41 gestational weeks.
引用
收藏
页码:920 / 929
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [31] Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement in predicting failed labor induction and cesarean delivery for failure to progress in nulliparous women
    Park, Kyo Hoon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 22 (04) : 722 - 727
  • [32] PREINDUCTION CERVICAL ASSESSMENT BY BISHOPS SCORE AND TRANSVAGINAL ULTRASOUND
    PATERSONBROWN, S
    FISK, NM
    EDMONDS, DK
    RODECK, CH
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1991, 40 (01): : 17 - 23
  • [33] The vague of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor
    Rane, SM
    Guirgis, RR
    Higgins, B
    Nicolaides, KH
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 24 (05) : 538 - 549
  • [34] Maternal Obesity Class as a Predictor of Induction Failure: A Practical Risk Assessment Tool
    Ronzoni, Stefania
    Rosen, Hadar
    Melamed, Nir
    Porat, Shay
    Farine, Dan
    Maxwell, Cynthia
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2015, 32 (14) : 1298 - 1304
  • [35] Risk Calculator to Predict Cesarean Delivery Among Women Undergoing Induction of Labor
    Rossi, Robert M.
    Requarth, Erin
    Warshak, Carri R.
    Dufendach, Kevin R.
    Hall, Eric S.
    DeFranco, Emily A.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 (03) : 559 - 568
  • [36] Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score
    Rozenberg, P
    Chevret, S
    Chastang, C
    Ville, Y
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 112 (02) : 192 - 196
  • [37] Failed induction of labor
    Schoen, Corina
    Navathe, Reshama
    [J]. SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2015, 39 (06) : 483 - 487
  • [38] Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term
    Souter, Vivienne
    Painter, Ian
    Sitcov, Kristin
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (03) : 273.e1 - 273.e11
  • [39] Predicting Cesarean Delivery After Induction of Labor Among Nulliparous Women at Term
    Tolcher, Mary Catherine
    Holbert, Michael R.
    Weaver, Amy L.
    McGree, Michaela E.
    Olson, Janet E.
    El-Nashar, Sherif A.
    Famuyide, Abimbola O.
    Brost, Brian C.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 126 (05) : 1059 - 1068
  • [40] Induction of Labor: An Overview of Guidelines
    Tsakiridis, Ioannis
    Mamopoulos, Apostolos
    Athanasiadis, Apostolos
    Dagklis, Themistoklis
    [J]. OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2020, 75 (01) : 61 - 72