Knowledge tracing based on multi-feature fusion

被引:7
作者
Xiao, Yongkang [1 ]
Xiao, Rong [1 ]
Huang, Ning [1 ]
Hu, Yixin [1 ]
Li, Huan [1 ]
Sun, Bo [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Artificial Intelligence, Xinjiekouwai St 19, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Deep learning; Educational data mining; Multi-feature fusion; Knowledge tracing; Self-attention mechanism; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1007/s00521-022-07834-w
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Knowledge tracing involves modeling student knowledge states over time so that we can accurately predict student performance in future interactions and recommend personalized student learning paths. However, existing methods, such as deep knowledge tracing and dynamic key-value memory networks (DKVMN), fail to comprehensively consider some key features that may influence the prediction results of knowledge tracing. To solve this problem, we propose a new model called knowledge tracing based on multi-feature fusion (KTMFF), which introduces features of the question text, the knowledge point difficulty, the student ability, and the duration time, etc., provides feature extraction methods, and uses a multi-head self-attention mechanism to combine the above features. This model predicts student mastery levels of knowledge points more accurately. Experiments show that the area under curve (AUC) of the KTMFF model is 3.06% higher than that of the DKVMN model. Furthermore, the ablation study indicates that each of the above features can improve the AUC of the model.
引用
收藏
页码:1819 / 1833
页数:15
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Abadi M, 2016, PROCEEDINGS OF OSDI'16: 12TH USENIX SYMPOSIUM ON OPERATING SYSTEMS DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION, P265
  • [2] Knowledge Tracing with Sequential Key-Value Memory Networks
    Abdelrahman, Ghodai
    Wang, Qing
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 42ND INTERNATIONAL ACM SIGIR CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL (SIGIR '19), 2019, : 175 - 184
  • [3] Baker RSJD, 2008, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5091, P406
  • [4] Birnbaum A., 1968, STAT THEORIES MENTAL, P397, DOI DOI 10.1002/J.2333-8504.1981.TB01255.X
  • [5] CORBETT AT, 1994, USER MODEL USER-ADAP, V4, P253, DOI 10.1007/BF01099821
  • [6] der Linden WV., 1997, J AM STAT ASSOC, V92, P1227, DOI [10.2307/2965612, DOI 10.2307/2965612]
  • [7] Devlin J, 2019, 2019 CONFERENCE OF THE NORTH AMERICAN CHAPTER OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS: HUMAN LANGUAGE TECHNOLOGIES (NAACL HLT 2019), VOL. 1, P4171
  • [8] Fayers P., 2004, Quality of Life Research, V13, P715, DOI [DOI 10.1023/B:QURE.0000021503.45367.F2, 10.1023/b:qure.0000021503.45367.f2]
  • [9] Graves A, 2012, STUD COMPUT INTELL, V385, P1, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-24797-2, 10.1162/neco.1997.9.1.1]
  • [10] Ha H, 2018, ARXIV