Prostate Imaging after Focal Ablation (PI-FAB): A Proposal for a Scoring System for Multiparametric MRI of the Prostate After Focal Therapy

被引:27
作者
Giganti, Francesco [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Dickinson, Louise [1 ]
Orczyk, Clement [2 ,3 ]
Haider, Aiman [4 ]
Freeman, Alex [4 ]
Emberton, Mark [2 ,3 ]
Allen, Clare [1 ]
Moore, Caroline M. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Radiol, London, England
[2] UCL, Div Surg & Intervent Sci, London, England
[3] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Urol, London, England
[4] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Pathol, London, England
[5] UCL, Div Surg & Intervent Sci, Charles Bell House,43-45 Foley St, London W1W 7TS, England
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY | 2023年 / 6卷 / 06期
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostatic neoplasms; Ablation techniques; High-intensity focused; ultrasound ablation; Irreversible electroporation; therapy; Cryotherapy; Photodynamic therapy; Focal therapy;
D O I
10.1016/j.euo.2023.04.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
At present there is no standardised system for scoring the appearance of the prostate on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after focal ablation for localised prostate cancer. We propose a novel scoring system, the Prostate Imaging after Focal Ablation (PI-FAB) score, to fill this gap. PI-FAB involves a 3-point scale for rating MRI sequences in sequential order: (1) dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences; (2) diffusion-weighted imaging, split into assessment of the high -b-value sequence first and then the apparent diffusion coefficient map; and (3) T2-weighted imaging. It is essential that the pretreatment scan is also available to help with this assessment. We designed PI-FAB using our experience of reading postablation scans over the past 15 years and include details for four representative patients initially treated with high intensity focus ultrasound at our institution to demonstrate the scoring system. We propose PI-FAB as a standardised method for evaluating prostate MRI scans after treatment with focal ablation. The next step is to evaluate its performance across multiple experienced readers of MRI after focal therapy in a clinical data set. Patient summary: We propose a scoring system called PI-FAB for assessing the appearance of magnetic resonance imaging scans of the prostate after focal treatment for localised prostate cancer. This will help clinicians in deciding on further follow-up. (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 634
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Prostate minimally invasive procedures: complications and normal vs. abnormal findings on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)
    Bui, Thanh-Lan
    Glavis-Bloom, Justin
    Chahine, Chantal
    Mehta, Raj
    Wolfe, Taylor
    Bhatter, Param
    Rupasinghe, Mark
    Carbone, Joseph
    Haider, Masoom A.
    Giganti, Francesco
    Giona, Simone
    Oto, Aytekin
    Lee, Grace
    Houshyar, Roozbeh
    [J]. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (09) : 4388 - 4400
  • [2] Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL): A New Quality Control Scoring System for Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate from the PRECISION trial
    Giganti, Francesco
    Allen, Clare
    Emberton, Mark
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2020, 3 (05): : 615 - 619
  • [3] A Grading System for the Assessment of Risk of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer at Multiparametric MRI
    Mehralivand, Sherif
    Shih, Joanna H.
    Harmon, Stephanie
    Smith, Clayton
    Bloom, Jonathan
    Czarniecki, Marcin
    Gold, Samuel
    Hale, Graham
    Rayn, Kareem
    Merino, Maria J.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2019, 290 (03) : 709 - 719
  • [4] Reporting Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: The PRECISE Recommendations-A Report of a European School of Oncology Task Force
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Giganti, Francesco
    Albertsen, Peter
    Allen, Clare
    Bangma, Chris
    Briganti, Alberto
    Carroll, Peter
    Haider, Masoom
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Kirkham, Alex
    Klotz, Laurence
    Ouzzane, Adil
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    Panebianco, Valeria
    Pinto, Peter
    Puech, Philippe
    Rannikko, Antti
    Renard-Penna, Raphaele
    Touijer, Karim
    Turkbey, Baris
    van Poppel, Heinrik
    Valdagni, Riccardo
    Walz, Jochen
    Schoots, Ivo
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 71 (04) : 648 - 655
  • [5] Mottet N, 2023, EAU-EANM-ESTROESUR-ISUP-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer
  • [6] National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2012, NICE guideline IPG424
  • [7] Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Recurrence Reporting (PI-RR): International Consensus -based Guidelines on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Recurrence after Radiation Therapy and Radical Prostatectomy
    Panebianco, Valeria
    Villeirs, Geert
    Weinreb, Jeffrey C.
    Turkbey, Baris, I
    Margolis, Daniel J.
    Richenberg, Jonathan
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Futterer, Jurgen
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Oto, Aytekin
    Bittencourt, Leonardo K.
    Haider, Masoom A.
    Salomon, Georg
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2021, 4 (06): : 868 - 876
  • [8] Medium-term oncological outcomes in a large cohort of men treated with either focal or hemi-ablation using high-intensity focused ultrasonography for primary localized prostate cancer
    Stabile, Armando
    Orczyk, Clement
    Hosking-Jervis, Feargus
    Giganti, Francesco
    Arya, Manit
    Hindley, Richard G.
    Dickinson, Louise
    Allen, Clare
    Punwani, Shonit
    Jameson, Charles
    Freeman, Alex
    McCartan, Neil
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Emberton, Mark
    Moore, Caroline M.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 124 (03) : 431 - 440
  • [9] Turkbey B, 2019, EUR UROL, V76, P340, DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033