Healthcare disparities and pelvic organ prolapse operative complications: a nationwide analysis

Introduction and hypothesisThe objective of this study was to evaluate the differences in the incidence of peri-operative complications at the time of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair based on health care disparities such as race and socioeconomic status.MethodsThe National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried using ICD-9/-10 codes for patients aged >18 years undergoing POP repair in 2008-2018. Demographic information, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), insurance status, and peri-operative complications were extracted. Multivariate weighted logistic regression using the discharge weights from NIS were constructed on binary outcomes. Complications with at least 1% incidence were included in the analysis.ResultsA total of 172,483 POP repair patients were analyzed: 130,022 (75.4%) were white, 10,561 (6.1%) were Black, 21,915 (12.7%) were Hispanic, and 9,985 (5.8%) were of other races. Patients with Medicaid as well as Black, Hispanic, and other races had higher odds of developing postoperative complications such as urinary tract infections, sepsis, and acute renal failure (p value <0.001-0.02). These were also more common in smaller, rural hospitals and with patients with an annual income of $45,999 or less (p value <0.001-0.03). Black and Hispanic patients had lower odds of intraoperative complications such as hemorrhage (aOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.84; aOR 0.75, 95% CI 0.7-0.8 respectively) or abdominopelvic injury (aOR 0.86, 95% CI 0.81-0.92; aOR 0.93, 95% CI 0.79-0.88 respectively) compared with white patients.ConclusionNonwhite patients with lower socioeconomic status had increased postoperative complications and fewer intraoperative complications from POP surgery, whereas white patients with higher socioeconomic status had more intraoperative complications.