Accurate Preoperative Evaluation of the Location of Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma Using Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography

被引:0
作者
Wada, Noriko [1 ,2 ]
Kurokawa, Yukinori [1 ,4 ]
Takahashi, Tsuyoshi [1 ]
Saito, Takuro [1 ]
Yamamoto, Kazuyoshi [1 ]
Yamashita, Kotaro [1 ]
Tanaka, Koji [1 ]
Makino, Tomoki [1 ]
Nakajima, Kiyokazu [1 ]
Tatsumi, Mitsuaki [3 ]
Eguchi, Hidetoshi [1 ]
Doki, Yuichiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Dept Gastroenterol Surg, Grad Sch Med, Osaka, Japan
[2] Ikeda City Hosp, Dept Surg, Osaka, Japan
[3] Osaka Univ, Dept Radiol, Grad Sch Med, Osaka, Japan
[4] Osaka Univ, Dept Gastroenterol Surg, Grad Sch Med, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
关键词
esophagogastric junction; gastroesophageal junction; Siewert classification; SUV max; positron emission tomography; METABOLIC TUMOR VOLUME; FDG-PET; PREDICTION; CANCER; CHEMOTHERAPY; SURVIVAL; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; ESOPHAGUS; CARCINOMA; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1177/00031348231183120
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The surgical procedure for esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma usually depends on the location of its epicenter or proximal margin, but accurate evaluation of these positions is often difficult. The usefulness of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for this purpose is unknown. Methods Between June 2005 and February 2015, we enrolled 30 patients with cT2-4 EGJ adenocarcinoma (Siewert type I/II) who underwent surgical resection. We ascertained the sensitivity and specificity of preoperative PET-CT for identifying the primary tumor and regional lymph node metastasis, and compared PET-CT and pathological findings in terms of the distance from the EGJ to the tumor epicenter or proximal tumor margin. Results PET-CT detected the primary tumor with a sensitivity of 97% (29/30), and detected lymph node metastasis with a sensitivity and specificity of 22% (4/18) and 100% (8/8), respectively. No significant association was observed between the maximal standardized uptake value and histological type, tumor size, or pT status. Regarding the accuracy of evaluating tumor location, the median differences between PET-CT and pathological measurements were .6 cm for the tumor epicenter and .5 cm for the proximal margin from the EGJ. PET-CT and pathological findings showed agreement regarding Siewert classification type (I or II) and lengths of esophageal involvement exceeding 4 cm or 2 cm in 77% (10/13), 85% (11/13), and 85% (11/13) of cases, respectively. Discussion PET-CT had high sensitivity for primary EGJ adenocarcinoma. It may effectively locate the tumor epicenter and proximal margin and thus help clinicians determine the optimal surgical procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:6005 / 6012
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, JAP CLASS ES CANC
[2]   PET/CT-based metabolic tumour volume for response prediction of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal carcinoma [J].
Blom, Rachel L. G. M. ;
Steenbakkers, Inge R. ;
Lammering, Guido ;
Vliegen, Roy F. A. ;
Belgers, Eric J. ;
de Jonge, Charlotte ;
Schreurs, Wendy M. J. ;
Nap, Marius ;
Sosef, Meindert N. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2013, 40 (10) :1500-1506
[3]   Evaluation of early response to concomitant chemoradiotherapy by interim 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with locally advanced oesophageal carcinomas [J].
Cuenca, Xavier ;
Hennequin, Christophe ;
Hindie, Elif ;
Rivera, Sofia ;
Vercellino, Laetitia ;
Baruch-Hennequin, Valerie ;
Gornet, Jean-Marc ;
Cattan, Pierre ;
Chirica, Mircea ;
Quero, Laurent .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2013, 40 (04) :477-485
[4]   Utility of positron emission tomography for the staging of patients with potentially operable esophageal carcinoma [J].
Flamen, P ;
Lerut, A ;
Van Cutsem, E ;
De Wever, W ;
Peeters, M ;
Stroobants, S ;
Dupont, P ;
Bormans, G ;
Hiele, M ;
De Leyn, P ;
Van Raemdonck, D ;
Coosemans, W ;
Ectors, N ;
Haustermans, K ;
Mortelmans, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (18) :3202-3210
[5]   Surgical Treatment of Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer [J].
Hashimoto, Tadayoshi ;
Kurokawa, Yukinori ;
Mori, Masaki ;
Doki, Yuichiro .
JOURNAL OF GASTRIC CANCER, 2018, 18 (03) :209-217
[6]   Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition [J].
Sano T. ;
Kodera Y. .
GASTRIC CANCER, 2011, 14 (02) :101-112
[7]  
Kawamura T, 2001, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V92, P634, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010801)92:3<634::AID-CNCR1364>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-X
[9]   Value of complete metabolic response by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in oesophageal cancer for prediction of pathologic response and survival after preoperative chemoradiotherapy [J].
Kim, Min Kyoung ;
Ryu, Jin-Sook ;
Kim, Sung-Bae ;
Ahn, Jin Hee ;
Kim, Soo Young ;
Park, Seung-Il ;
Kim, Yong Hee ;
Song, Ho Yong ;
Shin, Ji Hoon ;
Jung, Hwoon Yong ;
Lee, Gin Hyug ;
Choi, Kee Don ;
Cho, Kyung-Ja ;
Kim, Jong Hoon .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2007, 43 (09) :1385-1391
[10]   Assessment of lymph node metastases using 18F-FDG PET in patients with advanced gastric cancer [J].
Kim, SK ;
Kang, KW ;
Lee, JS ;
Kim, HK ;
Chang, HJ ;
Choi, JY ;
Lee, JH ;
Ryu, KW ;
Kim, YW ;
Bae, JM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2006, 33 (02) :148-155