Collision-free emergency planning and control methods for CAVs considering intentions of surrounding vehicles

被引:15
作者
Zhao, Shiyue [1 ]
Zhang, Junzhi [1 ,3 ]
He, Chengkun [1 ]
Huang, Minqing [2 ]
Ji, Yuan [1 ]
Liu, Weilong [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, State Key Lab Automot Safety & Energy, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Sch Traff & Transportat Engn, Changsha, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Vehicle & Mobil, Room A439-3,Lee Shau Kee Sci & Technol Bldg, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Intelligent connected vehicles; Collision-free; Braking; Surrounding vehicles; Motion intentions; AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES; AVOIDANCE; FRAMEWORK; BRAKING; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.isatra.2022.10.020
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Autonomous emergency braking (AEB) systems are able to control vehicles as needed to avoid vehicle rear-end collisions. However, these systems are ineffective in scenarios with laterally cut-in vehicles and rapidly-changing dangerous scenes. This paper proposes a novel collision-free emergency braking system (CFEBS) that can enable intelligent connected vehicles (CAVs) to plan and execute a more conservative safety trajectory for the braking process in dangerous scenes by considering the longitudinal and lateral motion intentions of the surrounding vehicles. An intention identification model for surrounding vehicles is proposed based on long-short term memory (LSTM) networks and conditional random fields (CRFs). By considering the surrounding vehicles as risk sources and quantifying the risk with the speed of the risk flow, a potential risk flow model is built to calculate the potential risk map (PRM) around the ego vehicle. The global safest trajectory is generated via the PRM using the discrete method. The output trajectory profile is regarded as the reference for a model predictive controller (MPC). Simulation results show that the proposed CFEBS can predict vehicle intention with 91.6% accuracy and control the ego vehicle to perform effective collision-free braking operations in emergency traffic environments.(c) 2022 ISA. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 547
页数:13
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Modeling and Calculating the Collision Risk for Air Vehicles
    Belkhouche, Fethi
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 62 (05) : 2031 - 2041
  • [2] Model-Based Threat Assessment for Avoiding Arbitrary Vehicle Collisions
    Brannstrom, Mattias
    Coelingh, Erik
    Sjoberg, Jonas
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2010, 11 (03) : 658 - 669
  • [3] Cheng Y, 2016, THESIS JILIN U CHANG
  • [4] Coelingh Erik, 2010, 2010 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2010), P155, DOI 10.1109/ITSC.2010.5625077
  • [5] Doi A., 1994, JSAE Review, V15, P335
  • [6] Identifying Modes of Intent from Driver Behaviors in Dynamic Environments
    Driggs-Campbell, Katherine
    Bajcsy, Ruzena
    [J]. 2015 IEEE 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2015, : 739 - 744
  • [7] Gers F., 2001, Long short-term memory in recurrent neural networks
  • [8] On the assessment of uncertainty in risk diagrams
    Goerlandt, Floris
    Reniers, Genserik
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2016, 84 : 67 - 77
  • [9] Gong J., 2014, MODEL PREDICTIVE CON
  • [10] Autonomous collision avoidance system by combined control of steering and braking using geometrically optimised vehicular trajectory
    Hayashi, Ryuzo
    Isogai, Juzo
    Raksincharoensak, Pongsathorn
    Nagai, Masao
    [J]. VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2012, 50 : 151 - 168