Elucidating the Corneal Endothelial Cell Proliferation Capacity through an Interspecies Transcriptome Comparison

被引:1
|
作者
Catala, Pere [1 ,2 ]
Vivensang, Flora [1 ]
van Beek, Daan [3 ]
Adriaens, Michiel E. [3 ]
Dickman, Mor M. [1 ,2 ]
LaPointe, Vanessa L. S. [1 ]
Kutmon, Martina [3 ]
机构
[1] MERLN Inst Technol Inspired Regenerat Med, Dept Cell Biol Inspired Tissue Engn, NL-6229 ER Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Eye Clin Maastricht, Maastricht Univ Med Ctr, NL-6229 HX Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Maastricht Ctr Syst Biol MaCSBio, NL-6229 EN Maastricht, Netherlands
来源
ADVANCED BIOLOGY | 2023年 / 7卷 / 10期
关键词
corneal endothelial cells; corneal regeneration; cross-species; interspecies comparison; TGF-BETA-2; MODELS;
D O I
10.1002/adbi.202300065
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学]; R318.08 [生物材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080501 ; 080502 ;
摘要
The regenerative capacity of corneal endothelial cells (CECs) differs between species; in bigger mammals, CECs are arrested in a non-proliferative state. Damage to these cells can compromise their function causing corneal opacity. Corneal transplantation is the current treatment for the recovery of clear eyesight, but the donor tissue demand is higher than the availability and there is a need to develop novel treatments. Interestingly, rabbit CECs retain a high proliferative profile and can repopulate the endothelium. There is a lack of fundamental knowledge to explain these differences. Gaining information on their transcriptomic variances could allow the identification of CEC proliferation drivers. In this study, human, sheep, and rabbit CECs are analyzed at the transcriptomic level. To understand the differences across each species, a pipeline for the analysis of pathways with different activities is generated. The results reveal that 52 pathways have different activity when comparing species with non-proliferative CECs (human and sheep) to species with proliferative CECs (rabbit). The results show that Notch and TGF-beta pathways have increased activity in species with non-proliferative CECs, which might be associated with their low proliferation. Overall, this study illustrates transcriptomic pathway-level differences that can provide leads to develop novel therapies to regenerate the corneal endothelium.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [11] STAT3 signaling maintains homeostasis through a barrier function and cell survival in corneal endothelial cells
    Hara, Susumu
    Tsujikawa, Motokazu
    Maruyama, Kazuichi
    Nishida, Kohji
    EXPERIMENTAL EYE RESEARCH, 2019, 179 : 132 - 141
  • [12] R-spondin1 Regulates Cell Proliferation of Corneal Endothelial Cells via the Wnt3a/β-Catenin Pathway
    Okumura, Naoki
    Nakamura, Takahiro
    Kay, EunDuck P.
    Nakahara, Makiko
    Kinoshita, Shigeru
    Koizumi, Noriko
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (10) : 6861 - 6869
  • [13] Single-cell-resolved interspecies comparison shows a shared inflammatory axis and a dominant neutrophil-endothelial program in severe COVID-19
    Peidli, Stefan
    Nouailles, Geraldine
    Wyler, Emanuel
    Adler, Julia M.
    Kunder, Sandra
    Voss, Anne
    Kazmierski, Julia
    Pott, Fabian
    Pennitz, Peter
    Postmus, Dylan
    Alves, Luiz Gustavo Teixeira
    Goffinet, Christine
    Gruber, Achim D.
    Thgen, Nils Blu euro
    Witzenrath, Martin
    Trimpert, Jakob
    Landthaler, Markus
    Praktiknjo, Samantha D.
    CELL REPORTS, 2024, 43 (06):
  • [14] Comparison of The Pre & Post-Operative Corneal Endothelial Cell Count after Phacoemulsification Using Different Irrigating Solutions (Balanced Salt Solution Versus Ringer's Lactate)
    Bokhari, Mohammad Hasan
    Ghaffar, Muhammad Tahir
    Anwar, Faisal
    Khan, Muhammad Shoaib
    Sibghat-Ul-Noor
    Tariq, Nayab
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2020, 14 (04): : 1291 - 1293
  • [15] INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH-FACTOR-I PROMOTES CELL-PROLIFERATION IN THE ABSENCE OF MODULATION OF COLLAGEN PHENOTYPES AND UTILIZES IRS-1, NOT PLC-GAMMA-1, IN CORNEAL ENDOTHELIAL-CELLS
    CHOI, SH
    KAY, EP
    OH, DS
    GU, X
    SMITH, RE
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 1995, 14 (08) : 669 - 676