Creating research ethics and integrity country report cards: Case study from Europe

被引:5
作者
Palos, Andrijana Perkovic [1 ]
Roje, Rea [1 ,3 ]
Tomic, Vicko [2 ]
Marusic, Ana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Split, Dept Res Biomed Hlth, Sch Med, Split, Croatia
[2] Univ Split, ST OPEN, Split, Croatia
[3] Univ Split, Dept Res Biomed & Hlth, Sch Med, Soltanska 2, Split 21000, Croatia
来源
ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY | 2024年 / 31卷 / 06期
关键词
Research integrity; responsible conduct of research; country report cards; research integrity framework; research integrity governance;
D O I
10.1080/08989621.2022.2163632
中图分类号
R-052 [医学伦理学];
学科分类号
0101 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Structures for and practices of research integrity (RI) and research ethics (RE) differ among countries. This study analyzed the processes and structures for RI and RE in Europe, following the framework developed at the World Conferences on Research Integrity. We present RI and RE Country Report Cards for 16 European countries, which included the information on RI and RE structures, processes and outcomes. While some of the countries are front-runners when it comes to RI and RE, with well-established and continually developing policies and structures, others are just starting their journey in RI and RE. Although RI and RE contextual divergences must be taken into account, a level of harmonization among the countries is necessary so that researchers working in the European area can similarly handle RI and RE issues and have similar expectations regardless of the organization in which they work. RI and RE Country Report Cards can be a tool to monitor, compare, and strengthen RE and integrity across countries through empowerment and inspiration by examples of good practices and developed systems.
引用
收藏
页码:620 / 654
页数:35
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2017, The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2017, Good research practice
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, Singapore Statement on Research Integrity
  • [4] European Universities' Guidance on Research Integrity and Misconduct: Accessibility, Approaches, and Content
    Bonn, Noemie Aubert
    Godecharle, Simon
    Dierickx, Kris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2017, 12 (01) : 33 - 44
  • [5] Fostering responsible research practices is a shared responsibility of multiple stakeholders
    Bouter, Lex M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 96 : 143 - 146
  • [6] Both Whistleblowers and the Scientists They Accuse Are Vulnerable and Deserve Protection
    Bouter, Lex M.
    Hendrix, Sven
    [J]. ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2017, 24 (06): : 359 - 366
  • [7] Broccardo CJ, 2018, RES INTEGR PEER REV, V3, DOI 10.1186/s41073-018-0055-1
  • [8] CORDIS-Community Research And Development Information Service, 2017, MAPP NORM FRAM ETH I
  • [9] Research integrity codes of conduct in Europe: Understanding the divergences
    Desmond, Hugh
    Dierickx, Kris
    [J]. BIOETHICS, 2021, 35 (05) : 414 - 428
  • [10] Donabedian A, 1992, Nurs Stand, V7, P4