The 2021 IAEA software intercomparison for k0-INAA

被引:6
作者
Blaauw, Menno [1 ]
D'Agostino, Giancarlo [2 ]
di Luzio, Marco [2 ]
Ho Manh Dung [3 ]
Jacimovic, Radojko [4 ]
Dias, Mauro Da Silva [5 ]
Semmler, Renato [5 ]
van Sluijs, Robbert [6 ]
Barradas, Nuno Pessoa [7 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Reactor Inst Delft, Mekelweg 15, NL-2629 JB Delft, Netherlands
[2] Ist Nazl Ric Metrol INRIM, Str Cacce 91, I-10135 Turin, TO, Italy
[3] Ctr Nucl Technol CNT, 217 Nguyen Trai St,Dist 1, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[4] Jozef Stefan Inst, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[5] Inst Pesquisas Energet & Nucl IPEN CNEN SP, Res Reactor Ctr CERPq, Av Prof Lineu Prestes 2242, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[6] K0 Ware, Schaesbergerweg 25, NL-6415 AB Heerlen, Netherlands
[7] IAEA, Vienna Int Ctr, POB 100, A-1400 Vienna, Austria
关键词
Neutron activation analysis; k0-method; Software intercomparison; TRIGA reactor; Neutron flux parameters; Germanium detector; TEST SPECTRA; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1007/s10967-022-08626-1
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In order to establish the variation between results in mass fractions due to software implementation, as measured by the k(0)-method for INAA, the IAEA has organized a software intercomparison. A complete set of test spectra and associated information was assembled. Efficiency curves, neutron spectrum parameters, correction factors and mass fractions were calculated with the participating programs (k0-IPEN, k0-INRIM, k0-DALAT, k0-IAEA and KayWin) using identical peak areas. In this paper, we report on the observed discrepancies, causes, remedies and future software developments. The test data, as well as intermediate results and observed mass fractions of the certified reference material BCR-320R "channel sediment" are available through the IAEA on request. The variations in concentrations attributed to differences between the programs were initially found to be 5.6 and 7.9%, for certified and uncertified concentrations, respectively. After the certified concentrations had been made available to the participants and they had been allowed to improve their programs, the variations found were 2.7 and 3.4%, respectively. The main identified remaining causes of variation are differences in the procedures used for detector efficiency characterisation and neutron spectrum parameter determination.
引用
收藏
页码:3387 / 3400
页数:14
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, KAYZERO SOLCOI REACT
[2]   The 2002 IAEA intercomparison of software for low-level γ-ray spectrometry [J].
Arnold, D ;
Blaauw, M ;
Fazinic, S ;
Kolotov, VP .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2005, 536 (1-2) :196-210
[3]   International Atomic Energy Agency intercomparison of ion beam analysis software [J].
Barradas, N. P. ;
Arstila, K. ;
Battistig, G. ;
Bianconi, M. ;
Dytlewski, N. ;
Jeynes, C. ;
Kotai, E. ;
Lulli, G. ;
Mayer, M. ;
Rauhala, E. ;
Szilagyi, E. ;
Thompson, M. .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 2007, 262 (02) :281-303
[4]   International Atomic Energy Agency inter-comparison of particle induced gamma-ray emission codes for bulk samples [J].
Barradas, N. Pessoa ;
Cruz, J. ;
Fonseca, M. ;
de Jesus, A. P. ;
Lagoyannis, A. ;
Manteigas, V. ;
Mayer, M. ;
Preketes-Sigalas, K. ;
Dimitriou, P. .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 2020, 468 :37-47
[5]   The 2000 IAEA intercomparison of PIXE spectrum analysis software [J].
Blaauw, M ;
Campbell, JL ;
Fazinic, S ;
Jaksic, M ;
Orlic, I ;
Van Espen, P .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 2002, 189 :113-122
[6]   The 1995 IAEA intercomparison of gamma-ray spectrum analysis software [J].
Blaauw, M ;
Fernandez, VO ;
vanEspen, P ;
Bernasconi, G ;
Noy, RC ;
Dung, HM ;
Molla, NI .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 1997, 387 (03) :416-432
[7]   The 1997 IAEA intercomparison of commercially available PC-based software for alpha-particle spectrometry [J].
Blaauw, M ;
García-Toraño, E ;
Woods, S ;
Fazinic, S .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 1999, 428 (2-3) :317-329
[8]   IAEA gamma-ray spectra for testing of spectrum analysis software [J].
Blaauw, M ;
Fernandez, VO ;
Westmeier, W .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 1997, 387 (03) :410-415
[9]   The influence of sample properties and sample geometry on the accuracy of gamma-ray spectrometric analyses [J].
Bossus, DAW ;
van Sluijs, R .
JOURNAL OF RADIOANALYTICAL AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY, 1998, 233 (1-2) :143-148
[10]   The k0-INRIM software: a tool to compile uncertainty budgets in neutron activation analysis based on k0-standardisation [J].
D'Agostino, G. ;
Di Luzio, M. ;
Oddone, M. .
MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 31 (01)