Water footprint assessment of mining and processing of gold in Turkey

被引:1
作者
Guney, Emre [1 ,2 ]
Demirel, Nuray [1 ]
机构
[1] Middle East Tech Univ, Min Engn, Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Middle East Tech Univ, Min Engn, Dumlupınar Bulvari 1,Univ Mahallesi, TR-06800 Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
Water Footprint Assessment; Life Cycle Assessment; Sustainable Water Management; Gold Mining; water consumption in gold processing; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; FRAMEWORK; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1080/17480930.2024.2303179
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study aims to identify critical points by calculating the water footprint (WF) of a mine and assessing the environmental impact of this water usage. Utilising the Water Footprint Assessment (WFA) methodology for critical points and the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology for environmental impact, results reveal that, among the identified hotspots, the highest blue water footprint is associated with the lost return flow, measuring 260.61 m3/kg Au. Regarding the grey water footprint, arsenic exhibits the highest value, measuring 1.777 m3/kg Au. Among the five impact categories, climate change human health emerges as the most environmentally affected category.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 389
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Past, Present, and Future of Virtual Water and Water Footprint
    Ma, Weijing
    Opp, Christian
    Yang, Dewei
    WATER, 2020, 12 (11) : 1 - 20
  • [32] Understanding the LCA and ISO water footprint: A response to Hoekstra (2016) "A critique on the water-scarcity weighted water footprint in LCA"
    Pfister, Stephan
    Boulay, Anne-Marie
    Berger, Markus
    Hadjikakou, Michalis
    Motoshita, Masaharu
    Hess, Tim
    Ridoutt, Brad
    Weinzettel, Jan
    Scherer, Laura
    Doell, Petra
    Manzardo, Alessandro
    Nunez, Montserrat
    Verones, Francesca
    Humbert, Sebastien
    Harding, Kevin
    Benini, Lorenzo
    Oki, Taikan
    Finkbeiner, Matthias
    Henderson, Andrew
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 72 : 352 - 359
  • [33] Organizational water footprint: a methodological guidance
    Forin, Silvia
    Mikosch, Natalia
    Berger, Markus
    Finkbeiner, Matthias
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (02) : 403 - 422
  • [34] Comprehensive water footprint assessment of conventional and four alternative resource recovery based wastewater service options
    Romeiko, Xiaobo Xue
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2019, 151
  • [35] Comprehensive water footprint assessment of the dairy industry chain based on ISO 14046: A case study in China
    Bai, Xue
    Ren, Xiaojing
    Khanna, Nina Zheng
    Zhou, Nan
    Hu, Mengting
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 132 : 369 - 375
  • [36] Life-cycle-based water footprint assessment of coal-fired power generation in China
    Zhu, Yongnan
    Jiang, Shan
    Zhao, Yong
    Li, Haihong
    He, Guohua
    Li, Lei
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 254
  • [37] Environmental impact of an Italian wine bottle: Carbon and water footprint assessment
    Bonamente, Emanuele
    Scrucca, Flavio
    Rinaldi, Sara
    Merico, Maria Cleofe
    Asdrubali, Francesco
    Lamastra, Lucrezia
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 560 : 274 - 283
  • [38] Carbon and water footprint of coffee consumed in Finland—life cycle assessment
    Kirsi Usva
    Taija Sinkko
    Frans Silvenius
    Inkeri Riipi
    Hannele Heusala
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2020, 25 : 1976 - 1990
  • [39] Identification of methodological challenges remaining in the assessment of a water scarcity footprint: a review
    Quinteiro, Paula
    Ridoutt, Bradley G.
    Arroja, Luis
    Dias, Ana Claudia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (01) : 164 - 180
  • [40] Impact-oriented water footprint assessment of wheat production in China
    Zhai, Yijie
    Shen, Xiaoxu
    Quan, Taiyong
    Ma, Xiaotian
    Zhang, Ruirui
    Ji, Changxing
    Zhang, Tianzuo
    Hong, Jinglan
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 689 : 90 - 98