Energy Consumption Prediction of Additive Manufactured Tensile Strength Parts Using Artificial Intelligence

被引:6
作者
Ulkir, Osman [1 ]
Bayraklilar, Mehmet Said [2 ]
Kuncan, Melih [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Mus Alparslan Univ, Dept Elect & Energy, Mus, Turkiye
[2] Siirt Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Siirt, Turkiye
[3] Siirt Univ, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Siirt, Turkiye
[4] Siirt Univ, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, TR-56100 Siirt, Turkiye
关键词
energy consumption; additive manufacturing; machine learning; fused deposition modeling; 3D printer; CHALLENGES; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.1089/3dp.2023.0189
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The manufacturing sector's interest in additive manufacturing (AM) methods is increasing daily. The increase in energy consumption requires optimization of energy consumption in rapid prototyping technology. This study aims to minimize energy consumption with determined production parameters. Four machine learning algorithms are preferred to model the energy consumption of the fused deposition modeling-based 3D printer. The real-time measured test sample data were trained, and the prediction model between the parameters of 3D fabrication and the energy consumption was created. The predicted model was evaluated using five performance criteria. These are mean square error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), R-squared (R2), and explained variance score (EVS). It has been seen that the Gaussian Process Regression model predicts energy consumption in the AM with high accuracy: R2 = 0.99, EVS = 0.99, MAE = 0.016, RMSE = 0.022, and MSE = 0.00049.
引用
收藏
页码:e1909 / e1920
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Additive manufacturing: Challenges, trends, and applications
    Abdulhameed, Osama
    Al-Ahmari, Abdulrahman
    Ameen, Wadea
    Mian, Syed Hammad
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 11 (02)
  • [2] Transparency Built-in Energy Consumption and Cost Estimation for Additive Manufacturing
    Baumers, Martin
    Tuck, Chris
    Wildman, Ricky
    Ashcroft, Ian
    Rosamond, Emma
    Hague, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2013, 17 (03) : 418 - 431
  • [3] A review of the process physics and material screening methods for polymer powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Chatham, Camden A.
    Long, Timothy E.
    Williams, Christopher B.
    [J]. PROGRESS IN POLYMER SCIENCE, 2019, 93 : 68 - 95
  • [4] Gaussian process regression for geometry optimization
    Denzel, Alexander
    Kaestner, Johannes
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 148 (09)
  • [5] Friction-forging tubular additive manufacturing (FFTAM): A new route of solid-state layer-upon-layer metal deposition
    Derazkola, H. Aghajani
    Khodabakhshi, F.
    Gerlich, A. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-JMR&T, 2020, 9 (06): : 15273 - 15285
  • [6] Modeling layer geometry in directed energy deposition with laser for additive manufacturing
    dos Santos Paes, Luiz Eduardo
    Ferreira, Henrique Santos
    Pereira, Milton
    Xavier, Fabio Antonio
    Weingaertner, Walter Lindolfo
    Vilarinho, Louriel Oliveira
    [J]. SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 409
  • [7] A review on machine learning in 3D printing: applications, potential, and challenges
    Goh, G. D.
    Sing, S. L.
    Yeong, W. Y.
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2021, 54 (01) : 63 - 94
  • [8] Gupta B, 2017, Int J Crit Account, V163, P15, DOI DOI 10.5120/IJCA2017913660
  • [9] Note on the Rate and Energy Efficiency Limits for Additive Manufacturing
    Gutowski, Timothy
    Jiang, Sheng
    Cooper, Daniel
    Corman, Gero
    Hausmann, Michael
    Manson, Jan-Anders
    Schudeleit, Timo
    Wegener, Konrad
    Sabelle, Matias
    Ramos-Grez, Jorge
    Sekulic, Dusan P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2017, 21 : S69 - S79
  • [10] Additive Manufacturing Applications in Industry 4.0: A Review
    Haleem, Abid
    Javaid, Mohd
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL INTEGRATION AND MANAGEMENT-INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2019, 4 (04)