Prerequisites for teachers' technology use in formative assessment practices: A systematic review

被引:12
作者
Borte, Kristin [1 ]
Lillejord, Solvi [1 ,2 ]
Chan, Jessica [2 ]
Wasson, Barbara [1 ,3 ]
Greiff, Samuel [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bergen, Ctr Sci Learning & Technol SLATE, POB 7807, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Educ, 15 Norham Gardens, Oxford OX2 6PY, England
[3] Univ Bergen, Dept Informat Sci & Media Studies, POB 7800, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
[4] Univ Luxembourg, Dept Behav & Cognit Sci, 11 Porte Sci, L-4366 Esch, Luxembourg
关键词
Formative assessment; Teachers' technology use; Digital tool; Teachers as co -designers; Systematic review; Student active learning; Primary and secondary education; FEEDBACK; IMPLEMENTATION; MATHEMATICS; ACHIEVEMENT; DASHBOARD; EDUCATION; DESIGN; LONG;
D O I
10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100568
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
While researchers promote the interactive learning potential of digital tools, studies reveal that teachers adapt technology to existing practice instead of using the tools' potential for student active learning. Researchers also argue that formative assessment enhances students' learning, while studies find formative assessment difficult to implement. To investigate these paradoxes and better understand how teachers use digital tools in formative assessment and with what result, we conducted a systematic review of teachers' technology use in formative assessment practices in primary and secondary education. Systematic searches identified 22 relevant articles that are included in the review. We found unclear definitions of formative assessment across studies and document challenges teachers encounter when they use technology for formative assessment purposes. We conclude with three prerequisites for teachers' successful technology use in formative assessment practices: 1) clear definitions of formative assessment, 2) alignment between digital tools and pedagogical practice, and 3) data literacy to examine and interpret information and use this to improve students' learning. The review also documents knowledge gaps in current research.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
Adams A, 2015, INTERACT DES ARCHIT, P38
[2]   Teaching with learning analytics:how to connect computer-based assessment data with classroom instruction? [J].
Admiraal, Wilfried ;
Vermeulen, Jordi ;
Bulterman-Bos, Jacquelien .
TECHNOLOGY PEDAGOGY AND EDUCATION, 2020, 29 (05) :577-591
[3]  
Al-Olimat S., 2015, Teaching English with Technology, V15, P3
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Testing Times: The Uses and Abuses of Assessment
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Assessment for learning: Ten principles
[6]  
Baird J. A., 2014, Case Number 13/4697
[7]   Assessment and learning: fields apart? [J].
Baird, Jo-Anne ;
Andrich, David ;
Hopfenbeck, Therese N. ;
Stobart, Gordon .
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2017, 24 (03) :317-350
[8]   Cloud Pedagogy: Utilizing Web-Based Technologies for the Promotion of Social Constructivist Learning in Science Teacher Preparation Courses [J].
Barak, Miri .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 26 (05) :459-469
[9]   The characteristics of formative assessment in science education [J].
Bell, B ;
Cowie, B .
SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2001, 85 (05) :536-553
[10]   Formative assessment: a critical review [J].
Bennett, Randy .
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2011, 18 (01) :5-25