Sparse optimal control of Timoshenko's beam using a locking-free finite element approximation

被引:1
作者
Hernandez, Erwin [1 ]
Merino, Pedro [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tecn Federico Santa Maria, Dept Matemat, Valparaiso, Chile
[2] Escuela Poliecn Nacl, Ctr Modelizac Matemat MODEMAT, Quito, Ecuador
[3] Escuela Poliecn Nacl, Ctr Modelizac Matemat MODEMAT, Ladron Guevara E11-253, Quito, Ecuador
关键词
locking-free approximation; nonsmooth methods; optimal control problems; sparsity; Timoshenko beam; DISCRETIZATION; EQUATIONS;
D O I
10.1002/oca.3085
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper addresses the optimal control problem with sparse controls of a Timoshenko beam, its numerical approximation using the finite element method, and the numerical solution via nonsmooth methods. Incorporating sparsity-promoting terms in the cost function is practically useful for beam vibration models and results in the localization of the control action that facilitates the placement of actuators or control devices. We consider two types of sparsity-inducing penalizers: the L1$$ {L}<^>1 $$-norm and the L0$$ {L}<^>0 $$-penalizer, which measures function support. We analyze discretized problems utilizing linear finite elements with a locking-free scheme to approximate the states and adjoint states. We confirm that this approximation has the looking-free property required to achieve a linear convergence linear order of approximation for L1$$ {L}<^>1 $$ control case and depending on the set of switching points in the L0$$ {L}<^>0 $$ controls. This is similar to the purely L2$$ {L}<^>2 $$-norm penalized optimal control, where the order of approximation is independent of the thickness of the beam. Sparsity given by L1$$ {L}<^>1 $$ and L0$$ {L}<^>0 $$ penalties is an advantageous control strategy in the Timoshenko model because smaller supports in controls help to place actuator devices. We have confirmed theoretically and numerically the locking-free property of the sparse optimal controls by using a mixed formulation of the beam equations. In addition, we have derived optimality conditions and proposed nonsmooth numerical schemes to solve the associated optimization problems.image
引用
收藏
页码:1007 / 1029
页数:23
相关论文
共 21 条
[11]   Approximation of the vibration modes of a Timoshenko curved rod of arbitrary geometry [J].
Hernandez, Erwin ;
Otarola, Enrique ;
Rodriguez, Rodolfo ;
Sanhueza, Frank .
IMA JOURNAL OF NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 2009, 29 (01) :180-207
[12]   A variational discretization concept in control constrained optimization: The linear-quadratic case [J].
Hinze, M .
COMPUTATIONAL OPTIMIZATION AND APPLICATIONS, 2005, 30 (01) :45-61
[13]  
Ito K., 2014, SIAM J CONTROL OPTIM
[14]  
Ito K, 2008, ADV DES CONTROL, P1
[15]   Comparison of linear beam theories [J].
Labuschagne, A. ;
van Rensburg, N. F. J. ;
van der Merwe, A. J. .
MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2009, 49 (1-2) :20-30
[16]   An adaptive numerical method for semi-infinite elliptic control problems based on error estimates [J].
Merino, Pedro ;
Neitzel, Ira ;
Troeltzsch, Fredi .
OPTIMIZATION METHODS & SOFTWARE, 2015, 30 (03) :492-515
[17]   Sparse Optimal Control for Fractional Diffusion [J].
Otarola, Enrique ;
Salgado, Abner J. .
COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2018, 18 (01) :95-110
[18]  
Stadler G., 2019, COMPUT OPTIM APPL, V42, P159, DOI [10.1007/s10589-007-9150-9, DOI 10.1007/S10589]
[19]   Semismooth Newton methods for operator equations in function spaces [J].
Ulbrich, M .
SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 2003, 13 (03) :805-U1
[20]   CONVERGENCE AND REGULARIZATION RESULTS FOR OPTIMAL CONTROL PROBLEMS WITH SPARSITY FUNCTIONAL [J].
Wachsmuth, Gerd ;
Wachsmuth, Daniel .
ESAIM-CONTROL OPTIMISATION AND CALCULUS OF VARIATIONS, 2011, 17 (03) :858-886