Remote Monitoring of Visual Function in Patients with Maculopathy: The Aphelion Study

被引:2
作者
Joseph, Anthony [1 ]
Bullimore, Mark [2 ]
Drawnel, Faye [3 ]
Miranda, Marco [4 ,7 ]
Morgan, Zoe [3 ]
Wang, Yi-Zhong [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Retina Associates, Tucson, AZ USA
[2] Univ Houston, Coll Optometry, Houston, TX USA
[3] F Hoffmann La Roche Pharmaceut AG, Basel, Switzerland
[4] Roche Prod Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, England
[5] Retina Fdn Southwest, 9600 N Cent Expressway,Suite 200, Dallas, TX 75321 USA
[6] UT SouthWestern Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Dallas, TX USA
[7] UCL, Inst Ophthalmol, London, England
关键词
Contrast sensitivity; Hyperacuity; Maculopathy; Remote monitoring; Visual acuity; Smartphone application; COMPACT REDUCED LOGMAR; MACULAR DEGENERATION; SHAPE-DISCRIMINATION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; ACUITY CHART; HYPERACUITY; PROGRESSION; VALIDATION; AGREEMENT; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1007/s40123-023-00854-2
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
IntroductionRemote monitoring of vision, using tools such as the shape discrimination hyperacuity (SDH) test, can detect disease activity in patients with maculopathy. We determined the in-clinic accuracy and repeatability of three myVisionTrack expanded version (mVTx) tests for self-testing of visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity.MethodsAphelion, a single-arm, prospective study conducted at two sites in the USA, included adults with any maculopathy and a baseline VA of 0.7 log of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (Snellen 20/100) or better. Participants completed the mVTx tests (tumbling E, Landolt C, contrast sensitivity, and SDH) and standard clinical tests (near and distance Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] charts and the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart). Test-retest repeatability and agreement between the mVTx tests and the corresponding clinical test were assessed by Bland-Altman analyses. Participants also completed a usability survey.ResultsThe mean age of the 122 participants was 67 years. The most common diagnosis was age-related macular degeneration (42% of patients). The tumbling E test had a test-retest 95% limit of agreement (LoA) of +/- 0.18 logMAR; the Landolt C test, +/- 0.23 logMAR; the SDH test, +/- 0.24 logMAR; and the contrast sensitivity test, +/- 0.32 log contrast threshold (logCT). Compared with the distance ETDRS chart, the LoA was +/- 0.35 logMAR for the tumbling E test (mean difference, - 0.07 logMAR) and +/- 0.39 logMAR for the Landolt C test (mean difference, 0.03 logMAR). For the contrast sensitivity test, the LoA compared with the Pelli-Robson chart was +/- 0.30 logCT (mean difference, - 0.25 logCT). Most participants (85%) reported that they learned the tests quickly. The tumbling E test scored the highest on ease of use.ConclusionThe mVTx tests of VA are accurate and repeatable, supporting their potential use alongside the SDH test to detect disease progression remotely between clinic visits.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 422
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Changes in Intrapersonal Factors of Participants in the Pregnancy Remote Monitoring Study Who Are at Risk for Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension: Descriptive Quantitative Study
    Lanssens, Dorien
    Vandenberk, Thijs
    Storms, Valerie
    Thijs, Inge
    Grieten, Lars
    Bamelis, Lotte
    Gyselaers, Wilfried
    Tang, Eileen
    Luyten, Patrick
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [42] An IoT System for Remote Monitoring of Patients at Home
    Park, KeeHyun
    Park, Joonsuu
    Lee, JongWhi
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2017, 7 (03):
  • [43] Longitudinal Natural History Study of Visual Function in Bietti Crystalline Dystrophy: Implications for Early Intervention
    Han, Xiaoxu
    Li, Huajin
    Zhang, Dingding
    Li, Hui
    Zou, Xuan
    Sui, Ruifang
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2024, 65 (04) : 13 - 13
  • [44] Visual Function in Patients Treated with the GABAergic Anticonvulsant Drug Tiagabine
    Iiris Nousiainen
    Maija Mäntyjärvi
    Reetta Kälviäinen
    Clinical Drug Investigation, 2000, 20 : 393 - 400
  • [45] Patients treated with vigabatrin exhibit central visual function loss
    Hilton, EJR
    Cubbidge, RP
    Hosking, SL
    Betts, T
    Comaish, IF
    EPILEPSIA, 2002, 43 (11) : 1351 - 1359
  • [46] Visual function evaluation for low vision patients with advanced glaucoma
    Jeon, Soo Ji
    Jung, Younhea
    Jung, Chang-Sub
    Park, Hae-Young Lopilly
    Park, Chan Kee
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (07)
  • [47] BINOCULAR VISUAL FUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH A HISTORY OF MONOCULAR OPTIC NEURITIS
    NEWMAN, NJ
    WOLFE, JM
    STEWART, MI
    LESSELL, S
    CLINICAL VISION SCIENCES, 1991, 6 (02): : 95 - 107
  • [48] Remote Health Monitoring System for Bedbound Patients
    Alizadeh, Mostafa
    Shaker, George
    Safavi-Naeini, Safieddin
    2020 IEEE 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOENGINEERING (BIBE 2020), 2020, : 801 - 806
  • [49] Headache clinicians' perspectives on the remote monitoring of patients' electronic diary data: A qualitative study
    Minen, Mia T. T.
    George, Alexis
    Katara, Aarti
    Lebowitz, Naomi
    Snyder, Ivy Charlotte
    Busis, Neil A. A.
    Lipchitz, Jessica M. M.
    HEADACHE, 2023, 63 (07): : 917 - 925
  • [50] Relationship Between Foveal Cone Structure and Clinical Measures of Visual Function in Patients With Inherited Retinal Degenerations
    Ratnam, Kavitha
    Carroll, Joseph
    Porco, Travis C.
    Duncan, Jacque L.
    Roorda, Austin
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (08) : 5836 - 5847