Remote working and employee engagement: a qualitative study of British workers during the pandemic

被引:80
作者
Adisa, Toyin Ajibade [1 ]
Ogbonnaya, Chidiebere [2 ]
Adekoya, Olatunji David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ East London, Royal Docks Sch Business & Law, London, England
[2] Univ Sussex, Dept Management, Brighton, E Sussex, England
关键词
Remote working; Employee engagement; COR theory; Working from home; Covid-19; Virtual working; PSYCHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS; JOB; RESOURCES; CONSERVATION; PERFORMANCE; BUSINESS; MEANINGFULNESS; SATISFACTION; PREDICTORS; CONFLICT;
D O I
10.1108/ITP-12-2020-0850
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Purpose Through the lens of Conservation of Resources (COR) theory, this study explores how remote working inhibits employee engagement. The authors offer a fresh perspective on the most salient work- and nonwork-related risk factors that make remote working particularly challenging in the context of Covid-19. Design/methodology/approach The authors use data from semi-structured interviews with 32 employees working from home during the Covid-19 lockdown. Based on the interpretivist philosophical approach, the authors offer new insights into how employees can optimize work- and nonwork-related experiences when working remotely. Findings The authors show that the sudden transition from in-person to online modes of working during the pandemic brought about work intensification, online presenteeism, employment insecurity and poor adaptation to new ways of working from home. These stress factors are capable of depleting vital social and personal resources, thereby impacting negatively on employee engagement levels. Practical implications Employers, leaders and human resource teams should be more thoughtful about the risks and challenges employees face when working from home. They must ensure employees are properly equipped with the relevant resources and support to perform their jobs more effectively. Originality/value While previous research has focused on the benefits of remote working, the current study explores how it might be detrimental for employee engagement during a pandemic. The study provides new evidence on the most salient risks and challenges faced by remote workers, and how the unique Covid-19 context has made them more pronounced.
引用
收藏
页码:1835 / 1850
页数:16
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Organizational resources, organizational engagement climate, and employee engagement [J].
Albrecht, Simon ;
Breidahl, Emil ;
Marty, Andrew .
CAREER DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 23 (01) :67-85
[2]   Determinants of employee engagement and their impact on employee performance [J].
Anitha, J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2014, 63 (03) :308-323
[3]   Employee engagement: Do practitioners care what academics have to say - And should they? [J].
Bailey, Catherine .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2022, 32 (01)
[4]   Key questions regarding work engagement [J].
Bakker, Arnold B. ;
Albrecht, Simon L. ;
Leiter, Michael P. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 20 (01) :4-28
[5]   Strategic alignment with organizational priorities and work engagement: A multi-wave analysis [J].
Biggs, Amanda ;
Brough, Paula ;
Barbour, Jennifer P. .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2014, 35 (03) :301-317
[6]   Losses loom more likely than gains: Propensity to imagine losses increases their subjective probability [J].
Bilgin, Baler .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2012, 118 (02) :203-215
[7]  
Braun V., 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
[8]   Resilience in the face of uncertainty: early lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic [J].
Bryce, C. ;
Ring, P. ;
Ashby, S. ;
Wardman, J. K. .
JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2020, 23 (7-8) :880-887
[9]  
Cassell C., 2009, The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, P500
[10]   Employee engagement practices during COVID-19 lockdown [J].
Chanana, Nisha ;
Sangeeta .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, 2021, 21 (04)