Study on construction safety management in megaprojects from the perspective of resilient governance

被引:14
作者
Liu, Kai [1 ]
Liu, Yuming [1 ]
Kou, Yuanyuan [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Econ & Management, Qingdao, Peoples R China
关键词
Construction safety; Megaprojects; Resilient governance; Dynamic system; HEALTH; COMMUNITY; CLIMATE; CITIES; SYSTEM; DELAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106442
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The interior and exterior environments of megaprojects are extremely complex and construction safety has long been a concern. However, effective prevention, response and adaptation of construction safety incidents remains difficult. Therefore, this study uses the construction safety accident process as an entry point to construct an indicator system of construction safety impact factors for megaprojects based on a resilient governance perspective. The entropy-weighted TOPSIS method is used to assign weights to the influence factors, and a system dynamics model for building safety for megaprojects is developed. Moreover, the Vensim software was used to simulate the pattern of the influence of different factors on construction safety under different conditions. The findings suggest that optimizing and enhancing institutional resilience, organizational resilience, engineering resilience, technological resilience, and infrastructural resilience in megaprojects can improve the ability to prevent, respond to, and adapt to construction safety incidents. Engineering resilience (27.28%) and technological resilience (21.72%) are the most important and have the strongest effect on preventing and controlling construction safety risks. Moreover, degrading the complexity of construction safety risks and real-time adjustment of safety risk control strategies through resilient means can reduce risk management delays and effectively improve the efficiency of construction safety management.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 51 条
[11]   Designing, planning, and managing resilient cities: A conceptual framework [J].
Desouza, Kevin C. ;
Flanery, Trevor H. .
CITIES, 2013, 35 :89-99
[12]   Series of semi-Markov processes to model infrastructure resilience under multihazards [J].
Dhulipala, Somayajulu L. N. ;
Flint, Madeleine M. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2020, 193
[13]   Efficient and resilient governance of social-ecological systems [J].
Erickson, Adam .
AMBIO, 2015, 44 (05) :343-352
[14]   Future-proof cities through governance experiments? Insights from the Resilient Melbourne Strategy (RMS) [J].
Fastenrath, Sebastian ;
Coenen, Lars .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2021, 55 (01) :138-149
[15]   Safety-Knowledge Management in American Construction Organizations [J].
Hallowell, Matthew R. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2012, 28 (02) :203-211
[16]   Applying HRO and resilience engineering to construction: Barriers and opportunities [J].
Harvey, Eleanor J. ;
Waterson, Patrick ;
Dainty, Andrew R. J. .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2019, 117 :523-533
[17]   Systematic impact of institutional pressures on safety climate in the construction industry [J].
He, Qinghua ;
Dong, Shuang ;
Rose, Timothy ;
Li, Heng ;
Yin, Qin ;
Cao, Dongping .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2016, 93 :230-239
[18]   Surprise for science, resilience for ecosystems, and incentives for people [J].
Holling, CS .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1996, 6 (03) :733-735
[19]   Resilience engineering and the built environment [J].
Hollnagel, Erik .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2014, 42 (02) :221-228
[20]   From Construction Megaproject Management to Complex Project Management: Bibliographic Analysis [J].
Hu, Yi ;
Chan, Albert P. C. ;
Le, Yun ;
Jin, Run-zhi .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2015, 31 (04)