Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Indonesian version of the Critical-care Pain Observation Tool

被引:0
|
作者
Asriyanto, Luthfi fauzy [1 ]
Chayati, Nur [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Master Nursing Program, Postgrad Program, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
[2] Univ Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
关键词
Critical care; Pain assessment; Patients; Reliability; Validity; MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS; CLINICAL UTILITY; ILL; MANAGEMENT; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.12.013
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objective: The Critical-care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) is one of the most accurate methods for assessing pain in ICU patients with critical illness and/or a decreased level of consciousness (LOC). This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of the CPOT. Methods: The English version of CPOT was translated into the Indonesian version following five steps: initial translation, synthesis of instrument translation results, back translation, validation of the instrument by an expert committee, and testing of the Indonesian instrument. Between September and December 2022, a total of 52 ICU patients from four hospitals in Indonesia were evaluated for pain at rest, during body-turning procedure, and 15 minutes after the procedure using the CPOT. The researcher used the verbal Faces Pain Thermometer (FPT) instrument as a gold standard to assess the CPOT's criteria validity. Validity assessments included content and criterion validity. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and interrater reliability. Results: Higher CPOT scores were found during the body-turning procedure than at rest and after the procedure. The instrument's item-content validity index (I-CVI) ranged from 0.75 to 1.00, and the overall instrument's average scale-level content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) was 0.93. The statistical analysis revealed a positive correlation (r) between the CPOT and the patient's FPT scores (0.877-0.983, P < 0.01). The significant agreement amongst raters (k) revealed the inter-rater reliability of the CPOT (0.739 -0.834, P < 0.01). Conclusion: The Indonesian version of the CPOT has been proven valid and reliable in assessing pain in patients with critical illness and/or decreased LOC. (c) 2024 The authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of the Chinese Nursing Association.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 119
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reliability and Validity of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool: A Rapid Synthesis of Evidence
    Stamp, Ronald
    Tucker, Lissa
    Tohid, Hiba
    Gray, Richard
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MEASUREMENT, 2018, 26 (02) : 378 - 397
  • [22] Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Turkish Version of the International Hip Outcome Tool -12
    Atilla, Halls Atil
    Akdogan, Mutlu
    MEDICAL BULLETIN OF SISLI ETFAL HOSPITAL, 2020, 54 (04): : 483 - 489
  • [23] Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Korean Version of the Neck Disability Index
    Song, Kyung-Jin
    Choi, Byung-Wan
    Choi, Byung-Ryeul
    Seo, Gyeu-Beom
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (20) : E1045 - E1049
  • [24] Spanish version of the screening Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire: a cross-cultural adaptation and validation
    Antonio Ignacio Cuesta-Vargas
    Manuel González-Sánchez
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12
  • [25] Spanish version of the screening Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire: a cross-cultural adaptation and validation
    Ignacio Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio
    Gonzalez-Sanchez, Manuel
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2014, 12
  • [26] Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the ankle joint functional assessment tool (AJFAT) questionnaire
    Li, Jinfeng
    Qiu, Fanji
    Legerlotz, Kirsten
    JOURNAL OF FOOT AND ANKLE RESEARCH, 2023, 16 (01)
  • [27] Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Chinese Version of the STarT Back Screening Tool in Patients With Low Back Pain
    Luan, Shuo
    Min, Yu
    Li, Guoqi
    Lin, Caina
    Li, Xiao
    Wu, Shaoling
    Ma, Chao
    Hill, Jonathan C.
    SPINE, 2014, 39 (16) : E974 - E979
  • [28] Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Revised Nonverbal Pain Scale
    Kaya, Pinar
    Erden, Sevilay
    AGRI-THE JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF ALGOLOGY, 2019, 31 (01): : 15 - 22
  • [29] Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Brazilian Version of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire
    Toledo, Flavia O.
    Barros, Patricia S.
    Herdman, Michael
    Vilagut, Gemma
    Reis, Geraldo C.
    Alonso, Jordi
    da Rosa Sobreira, Claudia Ferreira
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2013, 46 (01) : 121 - 130
  • [30] Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a Brazilian Portuguese version of the chronic pain grade
    Bracher, Eduardo S. B.
    Pietrobon, Ricardo
    Eluf-Neto, Jose
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2010, 19 (06) : 847 - 852