Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Indonesian version of the Critical-care Pain Observation Tool

被引:0
|
作者
Asriyanto, Luthfi fauzy [1 ]
Chayati, Nur [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Master Nursing Program, Postgrad Program, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
[2] Univ Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
关键词
Critical care; Pain assessment; Patients; Reliability; Validity; MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS; CLINICAL UTILITY; ILL; MANAGEMENT; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.12.013
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objective: The Critical-care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) is one of the most accurate methods for assessing pain in ICU patients with critical illness and/or a decreased level of consciousness (LOC). This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of the CPOT. Methods: The English version of CPOT was translated into the Indonesian version following five steps: initial translation, synthesis of instrument translation results, back translation, validation of the instrument by an expert committee, and testing of the Indonesian instrument. Between September and December 2022, a total of 52 ICU patients from four hospitals in Indonesia were evaluated for pain at rest, during body-turning procedure, and 15 minutes after the procedure using the CPOT. The researcher used the verbal Faces Pain Thermometer (FPT) instrument as a gold standard to assess the CPOT's criteria validity. Validity assessments included content and criterion validity. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and interrater reliability. Results: Higher CPOT scores were found during the body-turning procedure than at rest and after the procedure. The instrument's item-content validity index (I-CVI) ranged from 0.75 to 1.00, and the overall instrument's average scale-level content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) was 0.93. The statistical analysis revealed a positive correlation (r) between the CPOT and the patient's FPT scores (0.877-0.983, P < 0.01). The significant agreement amongst raters (k) revealed the inter-rater reliability of the CPOT (0.739 -0.834, P < 0.01). Conclusion: The Indonesian version of the CPOT has been proven valid and reliable in assessing pain in patients with critical illness and/or decreased LOC. (c) 2024 The authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of the Chinese Nursing Association.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 119
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of the Dutch version of the critical-care pain observation tool
    Stilma, Willemke
    Rijkenberg, Saskia
    Feijen, Hilde M.
    Maaskant, Jolanda M.
    Endeman, Henrik
    NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2019, 24 (03) : 132 - 140
  • [2] Validation of a Chinese version critical-care pain observation tool in nonintubated and intubated critically ill patients: Two cross-sectional studies
    Chen, Jie
    Hu, Fen
    Yang, Jian
    Wu, Xiao-Ying
    Feng, Yi
    Zhan, Yan-Chun
    An, You-Zhong
    Lu, Qian
    Zhang, Hai-Yan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2019, 28 (15-16) : 2824 - 2832
  • [3] A Turkish Version of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool: Reliability and Validity Assessment
    Aktas, Yesim Yaman
    Karabulut, Neziha
    JOURNAL OF PERIANESTHESIA NURSING, 2017, 32 (04) : 341 - 351
  • [4] A preliminary validation of the Swedish version of the critical-care pain observation tool in adults
    Damstrom, D. Nurnberg
    Saboonchi, F.
    Sackey, P. V.
    Bjorling, G.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2011, 55 (04) : 379 - 386
  • [5] Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool With Seriously Ill Patients
    Ross, Melody
    Boitor, Madalina
    Gelinas, Celine
    JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE NURSING, 2016, 18 (05) : 413 - 420
  • [6] Validation Testing of the European Portuguese Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool
    Marques, Rita
    Araujo, Filipa
    Fernandes, Marisa
    Freitas, Jose
    Dixe, Maria Anjos
    Gelinas, Celine
    HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (06)
  • [7] Verification of the critical-care pain observation tool in conscious patients with hemiparesis or cognitive dysfunction
    Liu, Yu-Tse
    Lee, Cheng-Chi
    Chen, Ching-Chang
    Chiu, Yun-Han
    Liu, Zhuo-Hao
    Wang, Yu-Chi
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2021, 65 : 91 - 97
  • [8] Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Indonesian version of the Oswestry Disability Index
    Phedy, Phedy
    Djaja, Yoshi Pratama
    Tobing, Singkat Dohar Apul Lumban
    Gatam, Luthfi
    Librianto, Didik
    Fachrisal
    Gatam, Asrafi Rizki
    Hardiansyah, Nicko Perdana
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 30 (04) : 1053 - 1062
  • [9] Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Indonesian version of the Oxford Hip Score
    Silitonga, J.
    Djaja, Y. P.
    Dilogo, I. H.
    Pontoh, L. A. P.
    BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2021, 2 (09): : 765 - 770
  • [10] Validation of the use of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) with brain surgery patients in the neurosurgical intensive care unit
    Echegaray-Benites, Christine
    Kapoustina, Oxana
    Gelinas, Celine
    INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2014, 30 (05) : 257 - 265