Development and Evaluation of a Custom GPT for the Assessment of Students' Designs in a Typography Course

被引:11
作者
Almasre, Miada [1 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Comp & Informat Technol, Informat Technol Dept, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
关键词
assessment; ChatGPT; GPT-4; artificial intelligence; typography design; teaching and learning assessment;
D O I
10.3390/educsci14020148
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The recent advancements in the fields of AI technology, generative AI, and Large Language Models (LLMs) have increased the potential of the deployment of such tools in educational environments, especially in contexts where student assessment fairness, quality, and automation are a priority. This study introduces an AI-enhanced evaluation tool that utilizes OpenAI's GPT-4 and the recently released custom GPT feature to evaluate the typography designs of 25 students enrolled in the Visual Media diploma offered by King Abdulaziz University. A mixed methods approach is adopted to evaluate the performance of this tool against the rubric-based evaluations offered by two human evaluators, considering both grading and text feedback. The results indicate that there are statistically significant differences between the AI tool's grading and feedback when compared to that of Evaluator 2; however, none is reported with Evaluator 1. The study presents a qualitative interpretation of the comprehensive feedback by the evaluator and reflects in further research in this area.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Amri Muhammad Miftahul, 2023, J. Nov. Eng. Sci. Technol., V2, P34, DOI [DOI 10.56741/JNEST.V2I02.315, 10.56741/jnest.v2i02.315]
[2]  
Cockburn I.M., 2018, EC ARTIFICIAL INTELL, DOI DOI 10.7208/9780226613475-006
[3]   Artificial intelligence for education: Knowledge and its assessment in AI-enabled learning ecologies [J].
Cope, Bill ;
Kalantzis, Mary ;
Searsmith, Duane .
EDUCATIONAL PHILOSOPHY AND THEORY, 2021, 53 (12) :1229-1245
[4]   Can Large Language Models Provide Feedback to Students? A Case Study on ChatGPT [J].
Dai, Wei ;
Lin, Jionghao ;
Jin, Hua ;
Li, Tongguang ;
Tsai, Yi-Shan ;
Gasevic, Dragan ;
Chen, Guanliang .
2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, ICALT, 2023, :323-325
[5]   Can novel multimodal chatbots such as Bing Chat Enterprise, ChatGPT-4 Pro, and Google Bard correctly interpret electrocardiogram images? [J].
Fijacko, Nino ;
Prosen, Gregor ;
Abella, Benjamin S. ;
Metlicar, Spela ;
Stiglic, Gregor .
RESUSCITATION, 2023, 193
[6]  
Frieder S, 2023, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:2301.13867, 10.48550/arXiv.2301.13867, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.2301.13867]
[7]  
Fu Z., 2023, Trans. Soc. Sci. Educ. Humanit. Res, V1, P182
[8]   Unpacking the "Black Box" of AI in Education [J].
Gillani, Nabeel ;
Eynon, Rebecca ;
Chiabaut, Catherine ;
Finkel, Kelsey .
EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY, 2023, 26 (01) :99-111
[9]  
Haleem Abid, 2022, BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, V2, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.THENCLI.2023.100089, 10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100089, DOI 10.1016/J.TBENCH.2023.100089]
[10]   ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education [J].
Kasneci, Enkelejda ;
Sessler, Kathrin ;
Kuechemann, Stefan ;
Bannert, Maria ;
Dementieva, Daryna ;
Fischer, Frank ;
Gasser, Urs ;
Groh, Georg ;
Guennemann, Stephan ;
Huellermeier, Eyke ;
Krusche, Stepha ;
Kutyniok, Gitta ;
Michaeli, Tilman ;
Nerdel, Claudia ;
Pfeffer, Juergen ;
Poquet, Oleksandra ;
Sailer, Michael ;
Schmidt, Albrecht ;
Seidel, Tina ;
Stadler, Matthias ;
Weller, Jochen ;
Kuhn, Jochen ;
Kasneci, Gjergji .
LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2023, 103