Disparities Between Prenatal Ultrasound and Autopsy Findings in Pregnancies Resulting in Fetal Loss

被引:0
|
作者
Kedar Sade, Eliel [1 ,8 ,9 ]
Lantsberg, Daniel [2 ,3 ]
Sar-el, Moriel Tagar [4 ]
Gefen, Sheizaf [5 ,6 ]
Katorza, Eldad [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Edith Wolfson Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Univ Melbourne, Royal Womens Hosp, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Sheba Med Ctr, Dept Dermatol, Ramat Gan, Israel
[5] Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med E, Tel Aviv, Israel
[6] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[7] Sheba Med Ctr, Gertner Inst Epidemiol & Hlth Policy, Ramat Gan, Israel
[8] Edith Wolfson Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Holon, Israel
[9] Edith Wolfson Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Holon, Israel
关键词
autopsy; fetal ultrasound; malformations; prenatal diagnosis; POSTMORTEM FINDINGS; FETUSES; MALFORMATIONS; ABNORMALITIES; TERMINATION; DIAGNOSIS; ANOMALIES;
D O I
10.1002/jum.16376
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives-This retrospective study aimed to assess disparities between prenatal ultrasound and autopsy findings in pregnancies that resulted in fetal loss, and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of prenatal ultrasound using postmortem examinations as a gold standard.Methods-Our study included 136 autopsy cases following a fetal loss that occurred at our tertiary medical center for 8 years. A comparison between the prenatal ultrasound and autopsy findings was made, and all cases were classified according to the degree of agreement. The diagnostic performance of prenatal ultrasound was calculated at the level of organ system and specific malformations.Results-The primary sonographic diagnosis was confirmed in 91.9% of the cases (n = 125). General agreement was highest among central nervous system (CNS), cardiovascular and musculoskeletal systems (85.7%, n = 36, 18, and 12, respectively) and lowest among facial, multiple anomalies, genitourinary and gastrointestinal systems (50.0%, 74.3%, 78.6%, and 80.0%, n = 2, 26, 11, and 4, respectively). The sensitivity of ultrasound was highest in the CNS (93.2%) and musculoskeletal (87.0%) and lowest in the facial (32.3%) and pulmonary (13.0%) systems. Specifically, low diagnostic rates were noted in detecting ventriculomegaly, valvular anomalies, renal dysplasia, spleen and adrenal anomalies, and digital and facial defects.Conclusions-Our study observed an overall high agreement between prenatal ultrasound and autopsy while contributing to our comprehensive understanding of its strengths and limitations across various types of organ systems and specific malformations.
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 465
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fetuses and infants with congenital urinary system anomalies: correlation between prenatal ultrasound and postmortem findings
    Isaksen, CV
    Eik-Nes, S
    Blaas, HC
    Torp, SH
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 15 (03) : 177 - 185
  • [32] Identification of novel PIEZO1 variants using prenatal exome sequencing and correlation to ultrasound and autopsy findings of recurrent hydrops fetalis
    Datkhaeva, Ilina
    Arboleda, Valerie A.
    Senaratne, T. Niroshi
    Nikpour, Gelareh
    Meyerson, Cherise
    Geng, Yipeng
    Afshar, Yalda
    Scibetta, Emily
    Goldstein, Jeffrey
    Quintero-Rivera, Fabiola
    Crandall, Barbara F.
    Grody, Wayne W.
    Deignan, Joshua
    Janzen, Carla
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2018, 176 (12) : 2829 - 2834
  • [33] FETAL ULTRASOUND ABNORMALITIES - CORRELATION WITH FETAL KARYOTYPE, AUTOPSY FINDINGS, AND POSTNATAL OUTCOME - 5-YEAR PROSPECTIVE-STUDY
    WILSON, RD
    CHITAYAT, D
    MCGILLIVRAY, BC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1992, 44 (05): : 586 - 590
  • [34] Efficacy of Systematic Early-Second-Trimester Ultrasound Screening for Facial Anomalies: A Comparison between Prenatal Ultrasound and Postmortem Findings
    Lamanna, Bruno
    Dellino, Miriam
    Cascardi, Eliano
    Rooke-Ley, Mia
    Vinciguerra, Marina
    Cazzato, Gerardo
    Malvasi, Antonio
    Vitagliano, Amerigo
    Nicoli, Pierpaolo
    Di Cosola, Michele
    Ballini, Andrea
    Cicinelli, Ettore
    Vimercati, Antonella
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (16)
  • [35] Prenatal ultrasound evaluation of fetal Hb Bart's disease among pregnancies at risk at 11 to 14 weeks of gestation
    Sirichotiyakul, Supatra
    Luewan, Suchaya
    Srisupundit, Kasemsri
    Tongprasert, Fuanglada
    Tongsong, Theera
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2014, 34 (03) : 230 - 234
  • [36] Autopsy Findings of Central Nervous System Anomalies in Intact Fetuses Following Termination of Pregnancy After Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnosis
    Struksnaes, Camilla
    Blaas, Harm-Gerd Karl
    Vogt, Christina
    PEDIATRIC AND DEVELOPMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2019, 22 (06) : 546 - 557
  • [37] Correlation between ultrasound and autopsy findings after 2nd trimester terminations of pregnancy
    Antonsson, Per
    Sundberg, Anders
    Kublickas, Marius
    Pilo, Christina
    Ghazi, Sam
    Westgren, Magnus
    Papadogiannakis, Nikos
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (01) : 59 - 69
  • [38] Correlation between prenatal ultrasound and postmortem findings in 1029 fetuses following termination of pregnancy
    Struksnaes, C.
    Blaas, H. -G. K.
    Eik-Nes, S. H.
    Vogt, C.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 48 (02) : 232 - 238
  • [39] Routine second trimester ultrasound screening for prenatal detection of fetal malformations in Sassari University Hospital, Italy: 23 years of experience in 42,256 pregnancies
    Fadda, Giovanni Maria
    Capobianco, Giampiero
    Balata, Antonio
    Litta, Pietro
    Ambrosini, Guido
    D'Antona, Donato
    Cosmi, Erich
    Dessole, Salvatore
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2009, 144 (02) : 110 - 114
  • [40] Dilemma after termination of pregnancy due to urogenital fetal anomalies: Discrepancy between prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis and autopsy
    Ozdemir, Ozge
    Aksoy, Figen
    Sen, Cihat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 159 (01) : 223 - 228