The Mapping of Influencing Factors in the Decision-Making of End-of-Life Care Patients: A Systematic Scoping Review

被引:5
作者
da Silva, Mauricio de Almeida Pereira [1 ]
Corradi-Perini, Carla [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Parana, Bioeth Grad Program, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
关键词
Palliative care; End -of -life care; Terminal care; Clinical decision -making; Withholding treatment; RELIGIOUS BELIEFS; ADVANCED ILLNESS; CRITICALLY-ILL; BARRIERS; PEOPLE; PREFERENCES; HEURISTICS; FAMILIES; CANCER; BIASES;
D O I
10.25259/IJPC_292_2022
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Decisions in end-of-life care are influenced by several factors, many of which are not identified by the decision maker. These influencing factors modify important decisions in this scenario, such as in decisions to adapt to therapeutic support. This presented scoping review aims to map the factors that influence end-of-life care decisions for adult and older adult patients, by a scoping review. The review was carried out in 19 databases, with the keyword 'clinical decision-making' AND 'terminal care' OR 'end-of-life care' and its analogues, including publications from 2017 to 2022. The study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews. The search resulted in 3474 publications, where the presence of influencing factors in end-of-life decision-making for adults and the elderly was applied as a selection criterion. Fifty-four (54) of them were selected, which means 1.5% of all the results. Among the selected publications, 89 influencing factors were found, distributed in 54 (60.6%) factors related to the health team, 18 (20.2%) to patients, 10 (11.2%) related to family or surrogates and 7 (7.8%) factors related to the decision environment. In conclusion, we note that the decision-making in end-of-life care is complex, mainly because there is an interaction of different characters (health team, patient, family, or surrogates) with a plurality of influencing factors, associated with an environment of uncertainty and that result in a critical outcome, with a great repercussion for the end of life, making it imperative the recognition of these factors for more competent and safe decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 242
页数:9
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   Preferences and Experiences of Muslim Patients and Their Families in Muslim-Majority Countries for End-of-Life Care: A Systematic Review and Thematic [J].
Abdullah, Rafidah ;
Guo, Ping ;
Harding, Richard .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2020, 60 (06) :1223-+
[2]  
Aromataris E., 2020, JOANNA BRIGGS I REV, P1
[3]   The role of religious beliefs in ethics committee consultations for conflict over life-sustaining treatment [J].
Bandini, Julia I. ;
Courtwright, Andrew ;
Zollfrank, Angelika A. ;
Robinson, Ellen M. ;
Cadge, Wendy .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2017, 43 (06) :353-358
[4]  
Bardin L., 2015, Analise de conteudo
[5]   A mixed methods investigation of end-of-life surrogate decisions among older adults [J].
Batteux, Eleonore ;
Ferguson, Eamonn ;
Tunney, Richard J. .
BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2020, 19 (01)
[6]  
Beauchamp TL., 2013, PRINCIPLES BIOMEDICA, VSeventh
[7]   Biases and Heuristics in Decision Making and Their Impact on Autonomy [J].
Blumenthal-Barby, J. S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2016, 16 (05) :5-15
[8]   Physician-related determinants of medical end-of-life decisions - A mortality follow-back study in Switzerland [J].
Bopp, Matthias ;
Penders, Yolanda W. H. ;
Hurst, Samia A. ;
Bosshard, Georg ;
Puhan, Milo A. .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (09)
[9]  
Coulter Angela., 2011, Making Shared Decision-Making a Reality
[10]  
Cristina E, 2017, Cogent Medicine, V4, P1290307, DOI [10.1080/2331205x.2017.1290307, 10.1080/2331205X.2017.1290307, DOI 10.1080/2331205X.2017.1290307]