The role of the depth of resection of the distal tibia on biomechanical performance of the tibial component for TAR: A finite element analysis with three implant designs

被引:3
作者
Jyoti [1 ]
Ghosh, Rajesh [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Mandi, Sch Mech & Mat Engn, Biomech Res Lab, Kamand, Mandi 175075, Himachal Prades, India
关键词
Total ankle replacement; Implant design; Depth of bone resection; Micromotion; Stress shielding; Finite element analysis; TOTAL ANKLE ARTHROPLASTY; LONG-TERM; BONE; GEOMETRY; OUTCOMES; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.medengphy.2023.104034
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The depth of resection of the tibia bone in total ankle replacement (TAR) may influence implant-bone micro-motion and stress shielding. High implant-bone micromotion and stress-shielding lead to aseptic loosening of the tibial component for TAR. The aim was to improve the outcomes of the different designs of TAR (STAR, Mobility, and Salto) with the variation of the depth of resection of the distal tibia bone. Finite element (FE) models of the implanted tibia with the depth of resection varying from 6 mm to 16 mm and of the intact tibia was prepared. The value of micromotion increased as the depth of resection increased. The micromotion increased in the proximal anterior-posterior portion of the pegs for STAR, the posterior part of the stem for Mobility, and the proximal lateral portion of the keel for Salto with the increase in the depth of resection. Whereas, the stresses (von Mises) decreased in some regions and increased in some regions depending upon the implant design. But overall stresses decreased in the tibia bone. Furthermore, the mean stress shielding increased in all the designs as the depth of resection increased. This in silico study indicated that the depth of resection should be given more importance during TAR surgery. The ideal depth of resection should be minimum i.e., 6 mm based on this FE study.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] AITKEN GK, 1985, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P264
  • [2] Comparison of an inhomogeneous orthotropic and isotropic material models used for FE analyses
    Baca, Vaclav
    Horak, Zdenek
    Mikulenka, Petr
    Dzupa, Valer
    [J]. MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2008, 30 (07) : 924 - 930
  • [3] Postoperative evaluation of the total ankle arthroplasty
    Bestic, Joseph M.
    Peterson, Jeffrey J.
    DeOrio, James K.
    Bancroft, Laura W.
    Berquist, Thomas H.
    Kransdorf, Mark J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 190 (04) : 1112 - 1123
  • [4] Influence of Geometry and Depth of Resections on Bone Support for Total Ankle Replacement
    Bischoff, Jeffrey E.
    Schon, Lew
    Saltzman, Charles
    [J]. FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 38 (09) : 1026 - 1034
  • [5] Bonasia Davide Edoardo, 2010, Iowa Orthop J, V30, P119
  • [6] The Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement Long-Term, Eleven to Fifteen-Year, Survivorship Analysis of the Prosthesis in Seventy-two Consecutive Patients
    Brunner, Samuel
    Barg, Alexej
    Knupp, Markus
    Zwicky, Lukas
    Kapron, Ashley L.
    Valderrabano, Victor
    Hintermann, Beat
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2013, 95A (08) : 711 - 718
  • [7] Analysis of Failed Ankle Arthroplasty Components
    Currier, Barbara H.
    Hecht, Paul J.
    Nunley, James A., II
    Mayor, Michael B.
    Currier, John H.
    Van Citters, Douglas W.
    [J]. FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 40 (02) : 131 - 138
  • [8] Daniels Timothy R, 2014, JBJS Essent Surg Tech, V3, pe22, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.ST.M.00043
  • [9] DePuy, 2005, Surgical technique Mobility total ankle system
  • [10] Longitudinal migration and inducible displacement of the Mobility Total Ankle System Radiostereometry in 23 patients with 2 years of follow-up
    Dunbar, Michael J.
    Fong, Jason W.
    Wilson, David A.
    Hennigar, Allan W.
    Francis, Patricia A.
    Glazebrook, Mark A.
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2012, 83 (04) : 394 - 400