Combined vaginal progesterone and cervical cerclage in the prevention of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:15
作者
Aubin, Anne -Marie [1 ]
McAuliffe, Liam [1 ]
Williams, Kimberley [2 ]
Issah, Ashad [3 ]
Diacci, Rosanna [4 ]
McAuliffe, Jack E. [5 ]
Sabdia, Salma [1 ]
Phung, Jason [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Wang, Carol A. [6 ,7 ]
Pennell, Craig E. [6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] John Hunter Hosp, New Lambton Hts, NSW, Australia
[2] Western Australian Country Hlth Serv, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Northern Adelaide Local Hlth Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Cent Coast Hlth Dist, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[6] Univ Newcastle, Coll Hlth Med & Wellbeing, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[7] Hunter Med Res Inst, Mothers & Babies Res Program, New Lambton Hts, NSW, Australia
[8] Matern & Gynaecol John Hunter Hosp, New Lambton Hts, NSW, Australia
关键词
cervical cerclage; preterm birth; progestins; vaginal progesterone; DOUBLE-BLIND; NEONATAL COMPLICATIONS; SINGLETON GESTATIONS; UNDER-5; MORTALITY; NATIONAL CAUSES; MULTICENTER; MECHANISMS; PREGNANCY; OUTCOMES; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101024
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Vaginal progesterone and cervical cerclage are both effective interventions for reducing preterm birth. It is currently unclear whether combined therapy offers superior effectiveness than single therapy. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of combining cervical cerclage and vaginal progesterone in the prevention of preterm birth. DATA SOURCES: We searched Medline (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Cochrane Library (Wiley), and Scopus (from their inception to 2020). STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The review accepted randomized and pseudorandomized control trials, nonrandomized experimental control trials, and cohort studies. High risk patients (shortened cervical length <25mm or previous preterm birth) who were assigned cervical cerclage, vaginal progesterone, or both for the prevention of preterm birth were included. Only singleton pregnancies were assessed. METHODS: The primary outcome was birth <37 weeks. Secondary outcomes included birth <28 weeks, <32 weeks and <34 weeks, gestational age at delivery, days between intervention and delivery, preterm premature rupture of membranes, cesarean delivery, neonatal mortality, neonatal intensive care unit admission, intubation, and birthweight. Following title and full-text screening, 11 studies were included in the final analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing the risk of bias (ROBINS-I and RoB-2). Quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) tool. RESULTS: Combined therapy was associated with lower risk of preterm birth at <37 weeks than cerclage alone (risk ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.79) or progesterone alone (risk ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.96). Compared with cerclage only, combined therapy was associated with preterm birth at <34 weeks, <32 weeks, or <28 weeks, decreased neonatal mortality, increased birthweight, increased gestational age, and a longer interval between intervention and delivery. Compared with progesterone alone, combined therapy was associated with preterm birth at <32 weeks, <28 weeks, decreased neonatal mortality, increased birthweight, and increased gestational age. There were no differences in any other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Combined treatment of cervical cerclage and vaginal progesterone could potentially result in a greater reduction in preterm birth than in single therapy. Further, well-conducted and adequately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to assess these promising findings.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] RETRACTED: Effect of adjunctive vaginal progesterone after McDonald cerclage on the rate of second-trimester abortion in singleton pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial (Retracted Article)
    Ali, Mohammed K.
    Ahmed, Sameh E.
    Sayed, Gamal H.
    Badran, Esraa Y.
    Abbas, Ahmed M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2020, 149 (03) : 370 - 376
  • [2] Final results of the Cervical Incompetence Prevention Randomized Cerclage Trial (CIPRACT): Therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone
    Althuisius, SM
    Dekker, GA
    Hummel, P
    Bekedam, DJ
    van Geijn, HP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (05) : 1106 - 1112
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2014, Obstet Gynecol, V123, P372, DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000443276.68274.cc
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1977, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, V56, P247
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2014, REV MAN REVMAN
  • [6] Azargoon A, 2016, INT J REPROD BIOMED, V14, P309
  • [7] How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial
    Balduzzi, Sara
    Ruecker, Gerta
    Schwarzer, Guido
    [J]. EVIDENCE-BASED MENTAL HEALTH, 2019, 22 (04) : 153 - 160
  • [9] Cerclage for Short Cervix on Ultrasonography in Women With Singleton Gestations and Previous Preterm Birth A Meta-Analysis
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    Rafael, Timothy J.
    Szychowski, Jeff M.
    Rust, Orion A.
    Owen, John
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 117 (03) : 663 - 671
  • [10] 17-OHPC to Prevent Recurrent Preterm Birth in Singleton Gestations (PROLONG Study): A Multicenter, International, Randomized Double-Blind Trial
    Blackwell, Sean C.
    Gyamfi-Bannerman, Cynthia
    Biggio, Joseph R., Jr.
    Chauhan, Suneet P.
    Hughes, Brenna L.
    Louis, Judette M.
    Manuck, Tracy A.
    Miller, Hugh S.
    Das, Anita F.
    Saade, George R.
    Nielsen, Peter
    Baker, Jeff
    Yuzko, Oleksandr M.
    Reznichenko, Galyna I.
    Reznichenko, Nataliya Y.
    Pekarev, Oleg
    Tatarova, Nina
    Gudeman, Jennifer
    Birch, Robert
    Jozwiakowski, Michael J.
    Duncan, Monique
    Williams, Laura
    Krop, Julie
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2020, 37 (02) : 127 - 136