A Comparison of Cognitive and Social Presence in Online Graduate Courses: Asynchronous vs. Synchronous Modalities

被引:0
作者
Presley, Regina [1 ]
Cumberland, Denise M. [1 ]
Rose, Kevin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[2] Indiana Univ Purdue Univ Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN USA
来源
ONLINE LEARNING | 2023年 / 27卷 / 02期
关键词
Online instruction; synchronous vs; asynchronous format; cognitive presence; STUDENTS PERCEPTIONS; INQUIRY FRAMEWORK; COMMUNITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Over the last decade, the prevalence of online courses has continued to grow, and students in higher education are being offered increased access to technology and communication tools in online learning programs. This action research study analyzed the impact of two distinct types of online course instruction (100% asynchronous and weekly online synchronous meetings) on learning outcomes, including cognitive and social presence, knowledge gained, and student perceptions. Study participants consisted of graduate students enrolled in online sections of a course on program evaluation. Four sections of the course were available: Two included a synchronous meeting using web-conferencing, and two used an asynchronous format. A quasi-experimental design was used and included pre- and post-test knowledge assessment, a modified version of the Community of Inquiry (CoI) questionnaire, and end-of-course student evaluations. Our results suggest that when students learn in an asynchronous format, they have a higher cognitive presence. The average scores on the knowledge pre-test were the same for both sections, but post-test scores were slightly higher in the asynchronous section. Instructor ratings were high for all courses. These findings may offer valuable implications to higher education programs that have recently transitioned to online teaching modalities.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 264
页数:20
相关论文
共 61 条
[21]   Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework [J].
Garrison, D. R. ;
Cleveland-Innes, Martha ;
Fung, Tak Shing .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 13 (1-2) :31-36
[22]  
Garrison D.R., 2009, Journal of Distance Education, V23, P93
[23]  
Garrison D.R., 2001, Amer. J. Distance Educ., V15, P7, DOI [DOI 10.1080/08923640109527071, 10.1080/08923640109527071]
[24]   Facilitating Cognitive Presence in Online Learning: Interaction Is Not Enough [J].
Garrison, D. Randy ;
Cleveland-Innes, Martha .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION, 2005, 19 (03) :133-148
[25]   Understanding student evaluations of teaching in online learning [J].
Gomez-Rey, Pilar ;
Fernandez-Navarro, Francisco ;
Barbera, Elena ;
Carbonero-Ruz, Mariano .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 43 (08) :1272-1285
[26]  
Graham C., 2006, Beltwide Cotton Conferences
[27]   Time well spent: Creating a community of inquiry in blended first-year writing courses [J].
Hilliard, Lyra P. ;
Stewart, Mary K. .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 41 :11-24
[28]  
Hixon E, 2016, ONLINE LEARN, V20, P25
[29]  
Holmes C.M., 2017, Journal of Counselor Preparation Supervision, V9, P360, DOI [DOI 10.7729/92.1182, 10.7729/92.1182]
[30]  
Hrastinski S., 2008, EDUCAUSE Q, V31, P51, DOI DOI 10.1080/00071667608416307