Design Preferences for a Serious Game-Based Cognitive Assessment of Older Adults in Prison: Thematic Analysis

被引:6
作者
Mantell, Rhys [1 ]
Withall, Adrienne [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Radford, Kylie [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kasumovic, Michael [5 ,6 ]
Monds, Lauren [7 ]
Hwang, Ye In Jane [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Sch Populat Hlth, Samuels Bldg,F25,Samuel Terry Ave, Sydney 2052, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Ageing Futures Inst, Sydney, Australia
[3] Univ New South Wales, Sch Psychol, Sydney, Australia
[4] Neurosci Res Australia, Sydney, Australia
[5] Univ New South Wales, Sch Biol, Earth & Environm Sci, Sydney, Australia
[6] Arludo, Sydney, Australia
[7] Univ Sydney, Cent Clin Sch, Addict Med, Sydney, Australia
关键词
serious game; gamification; cognitive assessment; prison; older adults; older prisoners; game design; self-determination theory; VIDEO GAMES; HEALTH; CHOICE; IMPAIRMENT; AUTONOMY; SIZE; CARE;
D O I
10.2196/45467
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Serious games have the potential to transform the field of cognitive assessment. The use of serious game-based cognitive assessments in prison environments is particularly exciting. This is because interventions are urgently needed to address the rapid increase in the number of currently incarcerated older adults globally and because of the heightened risks of dementia and cognitive decline present in this population. Game-based assessments are assumed to be fun, engaging, and suitable alternatives to traditional cognitive testing, but these assumptions remain mostly untested in older adults. This is especially true for older adults in prison, whose preferences and needs are seldom heard and may deviate from those previously captured in studies on cognition and serious games. Objective: This study aimed to understand the design preferences of older adults in prison for a game-based cognitive assessment. Methods: This study used reflexive thematic analysis, underpinned by critical realism, and applied the technique of abduction. Overall, 4 focus groups with a total of 20 participants were conducted with older adults (aged >= 50 years; aged >= 45 years for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people) across 3 distinct prison environments in Australia. Results: Self-determination theory was used as a theoretical foundation to interpret the results. Overall, 3 themes were generated: Goldilocks-getting gameplay difficulty just right through optimal challenge (the first theme emphasizes the participants' collective desire for an individualized optimal level of difficulty in serious gameplay), Avoiding Childish Graphics-gimmicky gameplay can be condescending (the second theme raises the importance of avoiding immature and childlike gameplay features, as some older end users in prison felt that these can be condescending), and A Balanced Diet-meaningful choice and variety keeps game-based assessments fun (the third theme highlights the strong user preference for meaningful choice and variety in any serious game-based cognitive assessment to maximize in-game autonomy). Conclusions: The collection of these themes provides novel insights into key game design preferences of marginalized older adults.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 78 条
[51]   Taxonomy of approaches to developing interventions to improve health: a systematic methods overview [J].
O'Cathain, Alicia ;
Croot, Liz ;
Sworn, Katie ;
Duncan, Edward ;
Rousseau, Nikki ;
Turner, Katrina ;
Yardley, Lucy ;
Hoddinott, Pat .
PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIES, 2019, 5 (01)
[52]   The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings [J].
Patall, Erika A. ;
Cooper, Harris ;
Robinson, Jorgianne Civey .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2008, 134 (02) :270-300
[53]   Improving the care of older persons in Australian prisons using the Policy Delphi method [J].
Patterson, Karen ;
Newman, Claire ;
Doona, Katherine .
DEMENTIA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2016, 15 (05) :1219-1233
[54]   Older persons with dementia in prison: an integrative review [J].
Peacock, Shelley ;
Buries, Meridith ;
Hodson, Alexandra ;
Kumaran, Maha ;
MacRae, Rhoda ;
Peternelj-Taylor, Cindy ;
Holtslander, Lorraine .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRISONER HEALTH, 2020, 16 (01) :1-16
[55]   Determining Priorities in the Aboriginal and Islander Mental Health Initiative for Youth App Second Phase Participatory Design Project: Qualitative Study and Narrative Literature Review [J].
Povey, Josie ;
Sweet, Michelle ;
Nagel, Tricia ;
Lowell, Anne ;
Shand, Fiona ;
Vigona, Jahdai ;
Dingwall, Kylie M. .
JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2022, 6 (02)
[56]   A Motivational Model of Video Game Engagement [J].
Przybylski, Andrew K. ;
Rigby, C. Scott ;
Ryan, Richard M. .
REVIEW OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 14 (02) :154-166
[57]  
Rance N, 2017, J HEALTH PSYCHOL, V22, P582, DOI 10.1177/1359105315609088
[58]  
Rigby S, 2011, Common Sense Media, DOI [10.5040/9798400658105, DOI 10.4324/9781410602428]
[59]   Rethinking validity in qualitative sport and exercise psychology research: a realist perspective [J].
Ronkainen, Noora J. ;
Wiltshire, Gareth .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORT AND EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 19 (01) :13-28
[60]   The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach [J].
Ryan, Richard M. ;
Rigby, C. Scott ;
Przybylski, Andrew .
MOTIVATION AND EMOTION, 2006, 30 (04) :347-363