A whole life, national approach to optimize the thickness of wall insulation

被引:20
作者
Li, X. [1 ,2 ]
Tingley, D. Densley [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Civil & Struct Engn, Sir Frederick Mapping Bldg, Sheffield S1 3JD, England
[2] Hainan Univ, Coll Civil Engn & Architecture, Haikou 570228, Peoples R China
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Whole life energy consumption; Whole life carbon emissions; Wall retrofit; Insulation thickness optimization; Future variations; English housing stock; THERMAL INSULATION; BUILDING ENVELOPE; ENERGY SAVINGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2022.113137
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Insulating external walls has great potential to reduce post-retrofit operational energy consumption and thus carbon emissions, but determination of the optimal insulation thickness still remains a challenge in the building industry. Although life cycle performance assessment has been introduced into the optimization of wall insu-lation thickness, there is still a lack of studies conducted at the building stock level. Moreover, the impact of variations of future climate conditions and the carbon intensity of the electricity grid are rarely studied. This study aims to fill this gap, by developing and demonstrating a holistic whole life approach to determine the optimized wall insulation thickness of the English housing stock. The study assesses both the reduced post -retrofit operational energy and carbon, as well as the additional embodied energy and carbon from wall insu-lation. There are three different optimization aims, namely: maximize the whole life carbon emissions reduction, maximize the whole life energy consumption reduction, and maximize both the whole life energy consumption and carbon emissions reduction. The results revealed that the optimized glass wool insulation thickness varies from 0.010 m to 0.275 m, increasing wall insulation thickness further than optimized value will result in negative effects. Ignoring future variations could lead to overestimation of the reduction potential of insulation instal-lation on whole life energy consumption, and thus emissions reduction. The overestimation percentage for stock level whole life energy consumption reduction varies from 20.5% to 26.7%, and the overestimation percentage for stock level whole life carbon emissions reduction varies from 421.3% to 502.0%.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Environmental Impact Analysis on Residential Building in Malaysia Using Life Cycle Assessment [J].
Abd Rashid, Ahmad Faiz ;
Idris, Juferi ;
Yusoff, Sumiani .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (03)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, 15978: 2011 Sustainability of construction works. Assessment of environmental performance of buildings. Calculation method
[3]   Changing climate risk in the UK: A multi-sectoral analysis using policy-relevant indicators [J].
Arnell, N. W. ;
Kay, A. L. ;
Freeman, A. ;
Rudd, A. C. ;
Lowe, J. A. .
CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT, 2021, 31
[4]  
BEIS, 2022, UK GREENH GAS EM PRO
[5]  
BEIS, 2021, HOUS EN EFF DET REL
[6]  
BEIS, 2021, GREENH GAS REP CONV
[7]  
BEIS, 2021, EN CONS UK
[8]  
Boardman B., 2005, 40 HOUSE
[9]   Optimization of thermal insulation to achieve energy savings in low energy house (refurbishment) [J].
Bojic, Milorad ;
Miletic, Marko ;
Bojic, Ljubisa .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 84 :681-690
[10]  
Bolton P, 2021, FUEL POVERTY