The patient perspective on remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices

被引:8
|
作者
Hillmann, Henrike A. K. [1 ]
Hansen, Claudius [2 ]
Przibille, Oliver [3 ]
Duncker, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Hannover Heart Rhythm Ctr, Dept Cardiol & Angiol, Hannover, Germany
[2] Hosp Neu Bethlehem, Heart & Vasc Ctr, Gottingen, Germany
[3] Device Clin, Cardioangiol Ctr Bethanien CCB, Frankfurt, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE | 2023年 / 10卷
关键词
remote monitoring; cardiac implantable electronic devices; pacemaker; implantable cardioverter defibrillator; sudden cardiac death; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATORS; HEART-FAILURE; EXPERT CONSENSUS; FOLLOW-UP; ICD; OUTCOMES; MANAGEMENT; ACCEPTANCE; PACEMAKER;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2023.1123848
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
AimsRemote monitoring for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is well established in clinical routine and recommended by current guidelines. Nevertheless, data regarding patients' perceptions are limited. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the patient perspectives on the remote monitoring of cardiac devices in Germany. Methods and resultsPatients with CIEDs and remote monitoring of all current manufacturers from three German centers were asked to participate. The questionnaire consisted of 37 questions regarding the patients' individual use and perspectives on remote monitoring. Survey participation was anonymous and on a voluntary basis. A total of 617 patients (71.6% men) participated. Most patients reported feeling well informed (69.3%) and reported having unchanged or improved coping (98.8%) since the start of remote monitoring. At least 39.7% of patients experienced technical problems regarding the transmitter, whereas most patients (60.3%) reported that they never noted technical issues. Older patients had significantly less interest than younger patients in using their own smartphones for data transfer (p < 0.001). ConclusionPatients with remote follow-up of CIED reported that they felt well informed about the remote monitoring approach. Remote monitoring can support coping with their disease. With remote monitoring, patients experienced a prolongation of intervals of in-person follow-up visits, and especially younger patients would appreciate smartphone-based data transfer of their CIEDs.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable devices in the Asia-Pacific
    Lau, Chu-Pak
    Zhang, Shu
    EUROPACE, 2013, 15 : 65 - 68
  • [42] Home delivery of the communicator for remote monitoring of cardiac implantable devices: A multicenter experience during the covid-19 lockdown
    Magnocavallo, Michele
    Bernardini, Alessia
    Mariani, Marco Valerio
    Piro, Agostino
    Marini, Massimiliano
    Nicosia, Antonino
    Adduci, Carmen
    Rapacciuolo, Antonio
    Saporito, Davide
    Grossi, Stefano
    Santarpia, Giuseppe
    Vaccaro, Paola
    Rordorf, Roberto
    Pentimalli, Francesco
    Giunta, Giuseppe
    Campari, Monica
    Valsecchi, Sergio
    Lavalle, Carlo
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 44 (06): : 995 - 1003
  • [43] Economic analysis of remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices: Results of the Health Economics Evaluation Registry for Remote Follow-up (TARIFF) study
    Ricci, Renato Pietro
    Vicentini, Alfredo
    D'Onofrio, Antonio
    Sagone, Antonio
    Rovaris, Giovanni
    Padeletti, Luigi
    Morichelli, Loredana
    Fusco, Antonio
    De Vivo, Stefano
    Lombardi, Leonida
    Denaro, Alessandra
    Pollastrelli, Annalisa
    Colangelo, Irene
    Santini, Massimo
    HEART RHYTHM, 2017, 14 (01) : 50 - 57
  • [44] Economic evaluation of remote monitoring of patients with an implantable cardiac defibrillator (REMOTE-CIED study)
    de Graaf, Gimon
    Timmermans, Ivy
    Meine, Mathias
    Alings, Marco
    Pedersen, Susanne S.
    Mabo, Philippe
    Zitron, Edgar
    Redekop, Ken
    Versteeg, Henneke
    JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2024, 30 (07) : 1173 - 1185
  • [45] Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices in Europe: results of the European Heart Rhythm Association survey
    Hernandez-Madrid, Antonio
    Lewalter, Thorsten
    Proclemer, Alessandro
    Pison, Laurent
    Lip, Gregory Y. H.
    Blomstrom-Lundqvist, Carina
    EUROPACE, 2014, 16 (01): : 129 - 132
  • [46] Remote Monitoring of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Helping Our Patients Get Online and Stay Connected
    Ganesan, Anand N.
    Tiver, Kathryn D.
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 10 (02) : 331 - 333
  • [47] Remote monitoring of implanted cardiac devices: A guide for patients and families
    Rosman, Lindsey
    Rosenfeld, Lynda E.
    Johnston, Mary L.
    Burg, Matthew M.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 41 (09): : 1224 - 1228
  • [48] Remote monitoring of implanted cardiac devices: a plea for a nationwide exploration
    van Hemel, N. M.
    NETHERLANDS HEART JOURNAL, 2009, 17 (11) : 434 - 437
  • [49] Remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices
    Sticherling, Christian
    Kuehne, Michael
    Schaer, Beat
    Altmann, David
    Osswald, Stefan
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2009, 139 (41-42) : 596 - 601
  • [50] Remote monitoring of implantable devices: Should we continue to ignore it?
    Bertini, Matteo
    Marcantoni, Lina
    Toselli, Tiziano
    Ferrari, Roberto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 202 : 368 - 377