The patient perspective on remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices

被引:8
|
作者
Hillmann, Henrike A. K. [1 ]
Hansen, Claudius [2 ]
Przibille, Oliver [3 ]
Duncker, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Hannover Heart Rhythm Ctr, Dept Cardiol & Angiol, Hannover, Germany
[2] Hosp Neu Bethlehem, Heart & Vasc Ctr, Gottingen, Germany
[3] Device Clin, Cardioangiol Ctr Bethanien CCB, Frankfurt, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE | 2023年 / 10卷
关键词
remote monitoring; cardiac implantable electronic devices; pacemaker; implantable cardioverter defibrillator; sudden cardiac death; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATORS; HEART-FAILURE; EXPERT CONSENSUS; FOLLOW-UP; ICD; OUTCOMES; MANAGEMENT; ACCEPTANCE; PACEMAKER;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2023.1123848
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
AimsRemote monitoring for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is well established in clinical routine and recommended by current guidelines. Nevertheless, data regarding patients' perceptions are limited. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the patient perspectives on the remote monitoring of cardiac devices in Germany. Methods and resultsPatients with CIEDs and remote monitoring of all current manufacturers from three German centers were asked to participate. The questionnaire consisted of 37 questions regarding the patients' individual use and perspectives on remote monitoring. Survey participation was anonymous and on a voluntary basis. A total of 617 patients (71.6% men) participated. Most patients reported feeling well informed (69.3%) and reported having unchanged or improved coping (98.8%) since the start of remote monitoring. At least 39.7% of patients experienced technical problems regarding the transmitter, whereas most patients (60.3%) reported that they never noted technical issues. Older patients had significantly less interest than younger patients in using their own smartphones for data transfer (p < 0.001). ConclusionPatients with remote follow-up of CIED reported that they felt well informed about the remote monitoring approach. Remote monitoring can support coping with their disease. With remote monitoring, patients experienced a prolongation of intervals of in-person follow-up visits, and especially younger patients would appreciate smartphone-based data transfer of their CIEDs.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED)
    Zeitler, Emily P.
    Piccini, Jonathan P.
    TRENDS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2016, 26 (06) : 568 - 577
  • [2] Patient perspective on remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: rationale and design of the REMOTE-CIED study
    Versteeg, H.
    Pedersen, S. S.
    Mastenbroek, M. H.
    Redekop, W. K.
    Schwab, J. O.
    Mabo, P.
    Meine, M.
    NETHERLANDS HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 22 (10) : 423 - 428
  • [3] Patient satisfaction with remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices: the Valiosa questionnaire
    Ruiz Diaz, Miguel A.
    Egea Garcia, Marta
    Munoz Aguilera, Roberto
    Vinolas Prat, Xavier
    Silvestre Garcia, Jorge
    Alvarez Orozco, Maria
    Martinez Ferrer, Jose
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [4] Challenges in the remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices in 2021
    Malanchini, Giovanni
    Ferrari, Gabriele
    Leidi, Cristina
    Ferrari, Paola
    Senni, Michele
    De Filippo, Paolo
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2021, 79 (04) : 380 - 385
  • [5] Remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices: current state and future directions
    Ganeshan, Raj
    Enriquez, Alan D.
    Freeman, James V.
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 33 (01) : 20 - 30
  • [6] Remote Follow-Up/Monitoring of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Cay, Serkan
    Burunkaya, Duygu Kocyigit
    Bozyel, Serdar
    TURK KARDIYOLOJI DERNEGI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF CARDIOLOGY, 2025, 53 (01): : 53 - 61
  • [7] Utilization of the remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices in a diverse demographic cohort: Insights from a single-center observation
    Seo, Jiyoung
    Alhuarrat, Majd Al Deen
    Krishnan, Suraj
    Saralidze, Tinatin
    Lim, Hyomin
    Chen, Brett
    Flomenbaum, David
    Naser, Ahmad
    Kharawala, Amrin
    Apple, Samuel J.
    Ferrick, Neal
    Chudow, Jay
    Di Biase, Luigi
    Fisher, John D.
    Krumerman, Andrew
    Ferrick, Kevin J.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 47 (02): : 185 - 194
  • [8] Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices using smart device interface versus radiofrequency-based interface: A systematic review
    Tan, Vern Hsen
    Tow, Hui Xin See
    Fong, Khi Yung
    Wang, Yue
    Yeo, Colin
    Ching, Chi Keong
    Lim, Toon Wei
    JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2024, 40 (03) : 596 - 604
  • [9] Clinical utility of remote monitoring for patients with cardiac implantable electrical devices
    Yang, Shu
    Stabenau, Hans F.
    Kiernan, Katherine
    Diamond, Jamie E.
    Kramer, Daniel B.
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 66 (04) : 961 - 969
  • [10] Remote Monitoring for Implantable Cardiac Electronic Devices
    Young, Glenn D.
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2012, 21 (6-7) : 352 - 357