Immediate sciatic nerve reconstruction using an ipsilateral common peroneal nerve graft at the time of sarcoma resection

被引:0
|
作者
Hanada, M. [1 ,4 ]
Kadota, H. [2 ]
Fujiwara, T. [3 ]
Setsu, N. [3 ]
Endo, M. [3 ]
Matsumoto, Y. [3 ]
Nakashima, Y.
机构
[1] Kyushu Rosai Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Kitakyushu, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ, Dept Plast Surg, Fukuoka, Japan
[3] Kyushu Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Fukuoka, Japan
[4] Kyushu Rosai Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, 1 1, Sonekitamachi,Kokuraminamii ku, Kitakyushu 8000296, Japan
关键词
REPAIR; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1002/micr.31034
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundConcomitant resection of the sciatic nerve along with a malignant tumor is no longer a contraindication for limb-sparing surgery, as most of these patients remain ambulatory. However, sciatic nerve reconstruction after sarcoma resection is not commonly performed. Restoration of nerve function can improve patient quality of life. We describe our experience with four patients who underwent sciatic nerve reconstruction using an ipsilateral common peroneal nerve graft at the time of sarcoma resection. MethodsBecause of the low chance of peroneal nerve recovery, the ipsilateral peroneal trunk was used as a graft to reconstruct the tibial trunk of the sciatic nerve. Two patients were men and two were women. Mean age was 45.3 years (range, 15-62). Mean sciatic nerve defect length was 9.4 cm (range, 8.5-12.0). Proximal thigh defects (three patients) were reconstructed with a double cable; the one patient with a distal thigh defect underwent single cable reconstruction. Mean operation time was 492 min (range, 428-682). ResultsMean length of the harvested peroneal trunks was 21 cm (range, 11-26). Mean graft length was 11.9 cm (range, 11-13). Postoperative course was uneventful in all four patients. One patient died of sarcoma lung metastasis and could not be evaluated. Three patients were followed for more than 2 years. Two patients achieved British Medical Research Council grade 4 plantar flexion; the remaining patient achieved grade 5 plantar flexion and grade 4 toe flexion. Semmes-Weinstein monofilament sensory testing showed loss of protective sensation on the plantar surface in all three. Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores at last follow-up were 60.0%, 70.0%, and 43.3%, respectively. ConclusionsImmediate sciatic nerve reconstruction using an ipsilateral common peroneal nerve graft avoids reconstruction delay and scar tissue formation, which is advantageous for nerve recovery. This technique may be considered when sciatic nerve resection is anticipated during sarcoma resection.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Successful delayed reconstruction of common peroneal neuroma-in-continuity using sural nerve graft
    Reichl, Heike
    Ensat, Florian
    Dellon, A. Lee
    Wechselberger, Gottfried
    MICROSURGERY, 2013, 33 (02) : 160 - 163
  • [2] Effectiveness and Biocompatibility of Decellularized Nerve Graft Using an In Vivo Rat Sciatic Nerve Model
    Kim, Dong Hyun
    Shin, Seung-Han
    Lee, Myeong-Kyu
    Lee, Jae-Jin
    Kim, Jae Kwang
    Chung, Yang-Guk
    TISSUE ENGINEERING AND REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 18 (05) : 797 - 805
  • [3] Restoration of hamstring function following sciatic nerve resection at the greater sciatic foramen with reconstruction involving acellular nerve allograft and vascularized sural nerve autograft: A case report
    Sarcon, Aida K.
    Li, Neill Y.
    Houdek, Matthew T.
    Moran, Steven L.
    MICROSURGERY, 2022, 42 (08) : 824 - 828
  • [4] Reconstruction of Proper Digital Nerve Defects in the Thumb Using a Pedicle Nerve Graft
    Chen, Chao
    Tang, Peifu
    Zhang, Xu
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 130 (05) : 1089 - 1097
  • [5] Use of Vascularized Sural Nerve Grafts for Sciatic Nerve Reconstruction After Malignant Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Resection in the Lower Legs
    Tokumoto, Hideki
    Akita, Shinsuke
    Kubota, Yoshitaka
    Kuriyama, Motone
    Mitsukawa, Nobuyuki
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2018, 80 (04) : 379 - 383
  • [6] Reconstruction of the Rat Sciatic Nerve by Using Biodegradable and Non-Biodegradable Conduits
    Velichanskaya, A. G.
    Abrosimov, D. A.
    Bugrova, M. L.
    Kazakov, A., V
    Pogadaeva, E., V
    Radaev, A. M.
    Blagova, N., V
    Vasyagina, T., I
    Ermolin, I. L.
    SOVREMENNYE TEHNOLOGII V MEDICINE, 2020, 12 (05) : 48 - 54
  • [7] Rat Sciatic Nerve Reconstruction Across a 30 mm Defect Bridged by an Oriented Porous PHBV Tube With Schwann Cell as Artificial Nerve Graft
    Karimi, Mina
    Biazar, Esmaeil
    Keshel, Saeed Heidari
    Ronaghi, Abdolaziz
    Doostmohamadpour, Jafar
    Janfada, Alireza
    Montazeri, Arash
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2014, 60 (02) : 224 - 233
  • [8] How much time is needed for evaluating the sciatic nerve recovery after transect and graft conduit?
    Abdolmaleki, Arash
    Ghayour, Mohammad B.
    Moghimi, Ali
    Rassouli, Morteza B.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A, 2017, 105 (05) : 1558 - 1558
  • [9] The efficacy of combining a vascularized biogenic conduit and a decellularized nerve graft in the treatment of peripheral nerve defects: An experimental study using the rat sciatic nerve defect model
    Takeuchi, Hisataka
    Ikeguchi, Ryosuke
    Noguchi, Takashi
    Ando, Maki
    Yoshimoto, Koichi
    Sakamoto, Daichi
    Matsuda, Shuichi
    MICROSURGERY, 2022, 42 (03) : 254 - 264
  • [10] Reconstruction of Extensive Composite Parotid Region Oncologic Defects with Immediate Facial Nerve Reconstruction Using a Chimeric Scapulodorsal Vascularized Nerve Free Flap
    Mangialardi, Maria L.
    Honart, Jean-Fracois
    Qassemyar, Quentin
    Guyon, Alice
    Li, Sean S.
    Benmoussa, Nadia
    Beldarida, Vincent
    Temam, Stephane
    Kolb, Frederic
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2021, 37 (03) : 282 - 291