University entrepreneurial performance: A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis

被引:2
作者
Patricio, Lurdes D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ferreira, Joao J. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Beira Interior, NECE Res Unit, Covilha, Portugal
[2] Inst Politecn Viseu, Escola Super Tecnol & Gestao Viseu, Viseu, Portugal
[3] CISED Ctr Res Digital Serv, Viseu, Portugal
[4] QUT, Australian Ctr Business Res, Brisbane, Australia
关键词
discriminant; entrepreneurial HEI; entrepreneurial university; fsQCA; HEInnovate; 3RD MISSION; INNOVATION; PERSPECTIVE; CHALLENGES; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1111/hequ.12424
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
As key players in innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystems, Higher Education Institutions (HEI) assume a position as catalysts in creating and disseminating knowledge with repercussions in the societal, economic, political and innovation environments. In this scenario, HEI are facing the need to balance the performance of their traditional missions-teaching and research-with the pursuit of entrepreneurial performance. This brings awareness of the need to pay particular attention to HEI entrepreneurial performance (HEIEP) and how to measure it. Based on HEInnovate, a self-assessment tool resulting from a joint effort of the European Community and the OECD, this study aims to explore the benefits of university entrepreneurial metrics, analysing HEIEP as a discriminant function of the HEInnovate dimensions complemented with a qualitative approach using Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA). The analysis provides valuable details, presenting recipes based on the HEInnovate dimensions or combinations of dimensions to achieve a mission legitimation. This research brings awareness to the use of the HEInnovate scale, where it is possible to highlight the importance of the digital transformation and capability dimension to entrepreneurial performance (EP) and university mission legitimation.
引用
收藏
页码:602 / 622
页数:21
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Dilemma on the Entrepreneurial University Ideal: The Prevailing Academic Tensions [J].
Ahmad, Noor Hazlina ;
Halim, Hasliza Abdul ;
Ramayah, Thurasamy .
CROATIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION-HRVATSKI CASOPIS ZA ODGOJ I OBRAZOVANJE, 2016, 18 (02) :519-543
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2022, HEInnovate
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, OECD framework for the evaluation of SME and entrepreneurship policies and programmes
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, The Entrepreneurial and Innovative Higher Education Institution. A Review of the Concept and Its Relevance Today, DOI DOI 10.2791/593884
[5]   Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context [J].
Autio, Erkko ;
Kenney, Martin ;
Mustar, Philippe ;
Siegel, Don ;
Wright, Mike .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (07) :1097-1108
[6]   Institutions, resources and innovation in East Africa: A firm level approach [J].
Barasa, Laura ;
Knoben, Joris ;
Vermeulen, Patrick ;
Kimuyu, Peter ;
Kinyanjui, Bethuel .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2017, 46 (01) :280-291
[7]  
Barnes T., 2002, Eur. Manag. J., V20, P272, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0263-2373(02)00044-0, 10.1016/s0263-2373(02)00044-0]
[8]   University-centred entrepreneurial ecosystems in resource-constrained contexts [J].
Bedo, Zsolt ;
Erdos, Katalin ;
Pittaway, Luke .
JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS AND ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 27 (07) :1149-1166
[9]   Entrepreneurial universities and regional contribution [J].
Budyldina, Natalia .
INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2018, 14 (02) :265-277
[10]   'Mode 3' universities and academic firms: thinking beyond the box trans-disciplinarity and nonlinear innovation dynamics within coopetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems [J].
Carayannis, Elias G. ;
Grigoroudis, Evangelos ;
Campbell, David F. J. ;
Meissner, Dirk ;
Stamati, Dimitra .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2018, 77 (1-3) :145-185