Stability, survival, and patient satisfaction with CAD/CAM versus conventional multistranded fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a 6-month follow-up of a two-centre randomized controlled clinical trial

被引:19
|
作者
Gera, Arwa [1 ]
Pullisaar, Helen [2 ]
Cattaneo, Paolo M. [1 ,3 ]
Gera, Shadi [1 ]
Vandevska-Radunovic, Vaska [2 ]
Cornelis, Marie A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Dent & Oral Hlth, Sect Orthodont, Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Univ Oslo, Fac Dent, Inst Clin Dent, Dept Orthodont, Oslo, Norway
[3] Fac Med Dent & Hlth Sci, Melbourne Dent Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
LINGUAL RETAINER; STAINLESS-STEEL; RETENTION; FAILURE; RELAPSE;
D O I
10.1093/ejo/cjac042
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives The primary aim of this two-arm parallel two-centre randomized controlled trial was to compare computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) versus conventional multistranded fixed retainers (FRs) in terms of stability over 6 months. Secondary outcomes were failure rates and patient satisfaction. Methods Patients were randomized to CAD/CAM or conventional FRs in both arches, in 1:1 ratio and blocks of four. Allocation concealment was secured by using sequentially numbered envelopes. Patients were blinded. Retainers were bonded at the end of orthodontic treatment (T0), and patients were recalled after 1 (T1), 3 (T3), and 6 (T6) months. First-time retainer failures were recorded and digital impressions were taken. Arch widths and lengths, as well as Little's Irregularity Index (LII), were measured. Additionally, patients answered satisfaction questionnaires. Linear mixed models were applied for measurements and patient satisfaction. Survival analyses were estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves, along with Cox-regression modelling. Results One hundred and eighty-one patients were randomized (98 in Centre 1, and 83 in Centre 2): Ninety in the CAD/CAM group and 91 in the conventional group. Three subjects dropped out at baseline, as they did not attend any of the follow-up appointments.168 patients attended the T6 visit. There were no significant differences in arch dimensions between T0 and T6, whilst the LII was different only in the CAD/CAM group (mean difference: 0.2 mm; 95% confidence interval: 0.1 to 0.4; P < 0.001). Within 6 months, 39 upper retainers (19 out of 88 CAD/CAM and 20 out of 90 conventional retainers) and 52 lower retainers failed (26 out of 88 CAD/CAM and 26 out of 90 conventional retainers), with no significant difference between the survival of both types of retainers (hazard ratios conventional to CAD/CAM: upper arch: 0.99 [P =0.99], lower arch: 0.93 [P = 0.80]). There were no significant changes in patient satisfaction between the groups. No harms were observed. Conclusions There were no clinically significant differences in LII, arch widths and lengths between CAD/CAM and conventional retainers after 6 months. There was no difference in failures and in patient satisfaction between both types of FRs. Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04389879.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 67
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Stability, survival, patient satisfaction, and cost-minimization of CAD/CAM versus conventional multistranded fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a 2-year follow-up of a two-centre randomized controlled trial
    Pullisaar, Helen
    Cattaneo, Paolo M.
    Gera, Arwa
    Sankiewicz, Monika
    Bilinska, Malgorzata
    Vandevska-Radunovic, Vaska
    Cornelis, Marie A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2024, 46 (02)
  • [2] Relapse and failure rates between CAD/CAM and conventional fixed retainers: a 2-year follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Tran, Giau
    Rucker, Ryan
    Foley, Patrick
    Bankhead, Brent
    Adel, Samar M.
    Kim, Ki Beom
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2024, 46 (01)
  • [3] Effects of fixed vs removable orthodontic retainers on stability and periodontal health: 4-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial
    Al-Moghrabi, Dalya
    Johal, Ama
    O'Rourke, Niamh
    Donos, Nikolaos
    Pandis, Nikolaos
    Gonzales-Marin, Cecilia
    Fleming, Padhraig S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2018, 154 (02) : 167 - +
  • [4] RETRACTED: The Effects of Fixed Versus Removable Orthodontic Retainers on Stability and Periodontal Health: 4-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial (Retracted Article)
    Hotchandani, Kamal Dhruvkumar
    Thangadurai, Janarthan
    Parate, Akhilesh Singh
    Nixon, Jeff Zacharia
    Kamble, Ranjit H.
    Meghalapriya, P.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2023, 15 : S502 - S507
  • [5] Effectiveness of dental floss in the management of gingival health: A 6-month follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Reiniger, Ana Paula P.
    Tavares, Rodrigo C. R.
    Ortigara, Gabriela B.
    Tatsch, Karen F.
    Uliana, Jaine C.
    Wikesjoe, Ulf M. E.
    Moreira, Carlos Heitor Cunha
    Kantorski, Karla Z.
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 28 (06)
  • [6] Effectiveness of conventional versus virtual reality-based vestibular rehabilitation exercises in elderly patients with dizziness: a randomized controlled study with 6-month follow-up
    Kanyilmaz, Tuba
    Topuz, Oya
    Ardic, Fazil Necdet
    Alkan, Hakan
    Öztekin, Saadet Nur Sena
    Topuz, Bulent
    Ardic, Fusun
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 88 : S41 - S49
  • [7] A comparative assessment of stability and satisfaction between two mandibular lingual retainers in orthodontic patients. A 2-year follow-up, single practice-based randomized trial
    Tyminska, Dorota
    Wegrodzka, Ewa
    Pandis, Nikolaos
    Fudalej, Potr S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2025, 47 (02)
  • [8] Indirect vs direct bonding of mandibular fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: A single-center randomized controlled trial comparing placement time and failure over a 6-month period
    Bovali, Efstathia
    Kiliaridis, Stavros
    Cornelis, Marie A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2014, 146 (06) : 701 - 708
  • [9] Comparison of patellar versus hamstring tendon autografts in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A 6-month follow-up of a randomized clinical trial
    Sadeghpour, Alireza
    Ebrahimpour, Adel
    Attar, Bahamin
    Azizian, Zahra
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 22
  • [10] A randomized clinical trial of emotional freedom techniques for chronic pain: Live versus self-paced delivery with 6-month follow-up
    Stapleton, Peta
    Wilson, Clara
    Uechtritz, Nicola
    Stewart, Michele
    McCosker, Michelle
    O'Keefe, Tom
    Blanchard, Matthew
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2025, 29 (03)