Inattentional blindness in medicine

被引:1
作者
Hults, Connor M. [1 ]
Ding, Yifan [1 ]
Xie, Geneva G. [1 ]
Raja, Rishi [1 ]
Johnson, William [1 ]
Lee, Alexis [1 ]
Simons, Daniel J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois Champaign Urbana, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
关键词
VISUAL-SEARCH; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; AUGMENTED REALITY; EYE-MOVEMENTS; MEMORY LOAD; VISION; TASK; SATISFACTION; SIMILARITY;
D O I
10.1186/s41235-024-00537-x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
People often fail to notice unexpected stimuli when their attention is directed elsewhere. Most studies of this "inattentional blindness" have been conducted using laboratory tasks with little connection to real-world performance. Medical case reports document examples of missed findings in radiographs and CT images, unintentionally retained guidewires following surgery, and additional conditions being overlooked after making initial diagnoses. These cases suggest that inattentional blindness might contribute to medical errors, but relatively few studies have directly examined inattentional blindness in realistic medical contexts. We review the existing literature, much of which focuses on the use of augmented reality aids or inspection of medical images. Although these studies suggest a role for inattentional blindness in errors, most of the studies do not provide clear evidence that these errors result from inattentional blindness as opposed to other mechanisms. We discuss the design, analysis, and reporting practices that can make the contributions of inattentional blindness unclear, and we describe guidelines for future research in medicine and similar contexts that could provide clearer evidence for the role of inattentional blindness.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] From "satisfaction of search" to "subsequent search misses": a review of multiple-target search errors across radiology and cognitive science
    Adamo, Stephen H.
    Gereke, Brian J.
    Shomstein, Sarah
    Schmidt, Joseph
    [J]. COGNITIVE RESEARCH-PRINCIPLES AND IMPLICATIONS, 2021, 6 (01)
  • [2] An individual differences approach to multiple-target visual search errors: How search errors relate to different characteristics of attention
    Adamo, Stephen H.
    Cain, Matthew S.
    Mitroff, Stephen R.
    [J]. VISION RESEARCH, 2017, 141 : 258 - 265
  • [3] Inattentional blindness and pattern-matching failure: The case of failure to recognize clinical cues
    Al-Moteri, Modi Owied
    Symmons, Mark
    Cooper, Simon
    Plummer, Virginia
    [J]. APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2018, 73 : 174 - 182
  • [4] Synthetic vision systems: The effects of guidance symbology, display size, and field of view
    Alexander, AL
    Wickens, CD
    Hardy, TJ
    [J]. HUMAN FACTORS, 2005, 47 (04) : 693 - 707
  • [5] Looking without seeing or seeing without looking? Eye movements in sustained inattentional blindness
    Beanland, Vanessa
    Pammer, Kristen
    [J]. VISION RESEARCH, 2010, 50 (10) : 977 - 988
  • [6] Satisfaction of Search from Detection of Pulmonary Nodules in Computed Tomography of the Chest
    Berbaum, Kevin S.
    Schartz, Kevin M.
    Caldwell, Robert T.
    Madsen, Mark T.
    Thompson, Brad H.
    Mullan, Brian F.
    Ellingson, Andrew N.
    Franken, Edmund A., Jr.
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2013, 20 (02) : 194 - 201
  • [7] Gaze dwell times on acute trauma injuries missed because of satisfaction of search
    Berbaum, KS
    Brandser, EA
    Franken, EA
    Dorfman, DD
    Caldwell, RT
    Krupinski, EA
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2001, 8 (04) : 304 - 314
  • [8] Who should be searching? Differences in personality can affect visual search accuracy
    Biggs, Adam T.
    Clark, Kait
    Mitroff, Stephen R.
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2017, 116 : 353 - 358
  • [9] You do not talk about Fight Club if you do not notice Fight Club: Inattentional blindness for a simulated real-world assault
    Chabris, Christopher F.
    Weinberger, Adam
    Fontaine, Matthew
    Simons, Daniel J.
    [J]. I-PERCEPTION, 2011, 2 (02): : 150 - 153