Risk communication: lessons from an ethnographic, pragmatic, and Canadian regulatory perspective

被引:3
作者
Bhuller, Yadvinder [1 ]
Trevithick-Sutton, Colleen C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Interdisciplinary Sch Hlth Sci, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Hlth Canada, Hlth Environm & Consumer Safety Branch, Consumer & Hazardous Prod Safety Directorate, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
Health Canada; regulatory context; risk communication; ethnographic; pragmatic; SYSTEMS THINKING; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.3389/fcomm.2024.1235055
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
In a regulatory context, it is important to understand how effective risk communication fits into the overall risk assessment, management, and decision-making process. This includes recognizing the intersections between risk analysis and the 3Ps: policy, politics, and publics, and understanding the barriers to effective communication. Risk communication is especially challenging when it requires the audience to follow and act on authoritative information or advice. Risk communicators must factor attributes such as risk perception, tolerance, and behaviors, and tailor the delivery of messages to diverse audiences. This paper captures the discourse from an intradepartmental workshop on risk communication with participants from Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada. The workshop provided an opportunity to discuss and share references to existing frameworks, pertinent documents, and examples of effective risk communication strategies based on the authors' ethnographic and pragmatic experiences. The workshop aimed to strengthen risk communication by better understanding the value in collaborating with interdisciplinary teams, applying a systems thinking lens, and finding opportunities to experiment and evaluate risk communication strategies for regulatory purposes.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1989, Improving Risk Communication
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2017, Tackling Antimicrobial Resistance and Antimicrobial Use: A Pan-Canadian Framework for Action
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2000, Governmental website
  • [4] Risk Science Contributions: Three Illustrating Examples
    Aven, Terje
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2020, 40 (10) : 1889 - 1899
  • [5] An Emerging New Risk Analysis Science: Foundations and Implications
    Aven, Terje
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2018, 38 (05) : 876 - 888
  • [6] The Evolving Field of Risk Communication
    Balog-Way, Dominic
    McComas, Katherine
    Besley, John
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2020, 40 : 2240 - 2262
  • [7] The opioid crisis in Canada: a national perspective
    Belzak, Lisa
    Halverson, Jessica
    [J]. HEALTH PROMOTION AND CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION IN CANADA-RESEARCH POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2018, 38 (06): : 224 - 233
  • [8] Canadian Regulatory Perspective on Next Generation Risk Assessments for Pest Control Products and Industrial Chemicals
    Bhuller, Yadvinder
    Ramsingh, Deborah
    Beal, Marc
    Kulkarni, Sunil
    Gagne, Matthew
    Barton-Maclaren, Tara S.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN TOXICOLOGY, 2021, 3
  • [9] Blamey A., 2007, EVALUATION-US, V13, P439, DOI DOI 10.1177/1356389007082129
  • [10] The Challenges of Putting Systems Thinking into Practice Comment on "What Can Policy-Makers Get Out of Systems Thinking? Policy Partners' Experiences of a Systems-Focused Research Collaboration in Preventive Health"
    Boswell, John
    Baird, Janis
    Taheem, Ravita
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 10 (05) : 290 - 292