Barriers and facilitators of artificial intelligence conception and implementation for breast imaging diagnosis in clinical practice: a scoping review

被引:11
作者
Lokaj, Belinda [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pugliese, Marie-Therese [1 ]
Kinkel, Karen [4 ]
Lovis, Christian [2 ,3 ]
Schmid, Jerome [1 ]
机构
[1] HES SO Univ Appl Sci & Arts Western Switzerland, Geneva Sch Hlth Sci, Delemont, Switzerland
[2] Univ Geneva, Fac Med, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Geneva Univ Hosp, Div Med Informat Sci, Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Reseau Hosp Neuchatelois, Neuchatel, Switzerland
关键词
Breast neoplasms; Diagnostic imaging; Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; AI; CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-023-10181-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectiveAlthough artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated promise in enhancing breast cancer diagnosis, the implementation of AI algorithms in clinical practice encounters various barriers. This scoping review aims to identify these barriers and facilitators to highlight key considerations for developing and implementing AI solutions in breast cancer imaging.MethodA literature search was conducted from 2012 to 2022 in six databases (PubMed, Web of Science, CINHAL, Embase, IEEE, and ArXiv). The articles were included if some barriers and/or facilitators in the conception or implementation of AI in breast clinical imaging were described. We excluded research only focusing on performance, or with data not acquired in a clinical radiology setup and not involving real patients.ResultsA total of 107 articles were included. We identified six major barriers related to data (B1), black box and trust (B2), algorithms and conception (B3), evaluation and validation (B4), legal, ethical, and economic issues (B5), and education (B6), and five major facilitators covering data (F1), clinical impact (F2), algorithms and conception (F3), evaluation and validation (F4), and education (F5).ConclusionThis scoping review highlighted the need to carefully design, deploy, and evaluate AI solutions in clinical practice, involving all stakeholders to yield improvement in healthcare.Clinical relevance statementThe identification of barriers and facilitators with suggested solutions can guide and inform future research, and stakeholders to improve the design and implementation of AI for breast cancer detection in clinical practice.Key Points & BULL; Six major identified barriers were related to data; black-box and trust; algorithms and conception; evaluation and validation; legal, ethical, and economic issues; and education.& BULL; Five major identified facilitators were related to data, clinical impact, algorithms and conception, evaluation and validation, and education.& BULL; Coordinated implication of all stakeholders is required to improve breast cancer diagnosis with AI.Key Points & BULL; Six major identified barriers were related to data; black-box and trust; algorithms and conception; evaluation and validation; legal, ethical, and economic issues; and education.& BULL; Five major identified facilitators were related to data, clinical impact, algorithms and conception, evaluation and validation, and education.& BULL; Coordinated implication of all stakeholders is required to improve breast cancer diagnosis with AI.Key Points & BULL; Six major identified barriers were related to data; black-box and trust; algorithms and conception; evaluation and validation; legal, ethical, and economic issues; and education.& BULL; Five major identified facilitators were related to data, clinical impact, algorithms and conception, evaluation and validation, and education.& BULL; Coordinated implication of all stakeholders is required to improve breast cancer diagnosis with AI.
引用
收藏
页码:2096 / 2109
页数:14
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [1] Existing and Emerging Breast Cancer Detection Technologies and Its Challenges: A Review
    Abdul Halim, Ahmad Ashraf
    Andrew, Allan Melvin
    Mohd Yasin, Mohd Najib
    Abd Rahman, Mohd Amiruddin
    Jusoh, Muzammil
    Veeraperumal, Vijayasarveswari
    Rahim, Hasliza A.
    Illahi, Usman
    Abdul Karim, Muhammad Khalis
    Scavino, Edgar
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (22):
  • [2] Detection and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer Using Artificial Intelligence Based Assessment of Maximum Intensity Projection Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Images
    Adachi, Mio
    Fujioka, Tomoyuki
    Mori, Mio
    Kubota, Kazunori
    Kikuchi, Yuka
    Wu Xiaotong
    Oyama, Jun
    Kimura, Koichiro
    Oda, Goshi
    Nakagawa, Tsuyoshi
    Uetake, Hiroyuki
    Tateishi, Ukihide
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 10 (05)
  • [3] Artificial Neural Networks in Mammography Interpretation and Diagnostic Decision Making
    Ayer, Turgay
    Chen, Qiushi
    Burnside, Elizabeth S.
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 2013
  • [4] Artificial Intelligence: A Primer for Breast Imaging Radiologists
    Bahl, Manisha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2020, 2 (04) : 304 - 314
  • [5] Applying deep learning in digital breast tomosynthesis for automatic breast cancer detection: A review
    Bai, Jun
    Posner, Russell
    Wang, Tianyu
    Yang, Clifford
    Nabavi, Sheida
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2021, 71
  • [6] Application of Deep Learning in Breast Cancer Imaging
    Balkenende, Luuk
    Teuwen, Jonas
    Mann, Ritse M.
    [J]. SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2022, 52 (05) : 584 - 596
  • [7] A Review of Applications of Machine Learning in Mammography and Future Challenges
    Batchu, Sai
    Liu, Fan
    Amireh, Ahmad
    Waller, Joseph
    Umair, Muhammad
    [J]. ONCOLOGY, 2021, 99 (08) : 483 - 490
  • [8] Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of breast cancer Yesterday, today and tomorrow
    Bennani-Baiti, B.
    Baltzer, P. A. T.
    [J]. RADIOLOGE, 2020, 60 (01): : 56 - 63
  • [9] Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: Clinical challenges and applications
    Bi, Wenya Linda
    Hosny, Ahmed
    Schabath, Matthew B.
    Giger, Maryellen L.
    Birkbak, Nicolai J.
    Mehrtash, Alireza
    Allison, Tavis
    Arnaout, Omar
    Abbosh, Christopher
    Dunn, Ian F.
    Mak, Raymond H.
    Tamimi, Rulla M.
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Swanton, Charles
    Hoffmann, Udo
    Schwartz, Lawrence H.
    Gillies, Robert J.
    Huang, Raymond Y.
    Aerts, Hugo J. W. L.
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2019, 69 (02) : 127 - 157
  • [10] AI-enhanced breast imaging: Where are we and where are we heading?
    Bitencourt, Almir
    Naranjo, Isaac Daimiel
    Lo Gullo, Roberto
    Saccarelli, Carolina Rossi
    Pinker, Katja
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 142