Comparison of the Sedative Effect of Ketamine, Magnesium Sulfate, and Propofol in Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:6
|
作者
Shafiee, Hamed [1 ]
Riahipour, Farahnaz [1 ]
Hormati, Ahmad [2 ]
Ahmadpour, Sajjad [3 ]
Habibi, Mohammad Amin [4 ]
Vahedian, Mostafa [5 ]
Aminnejad, Reza [6 ,7 ]
Saeidi, Mohammad [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Qom Univ Med Sci, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care, Qom, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Tehran, Iran
[3] Urmia Univ Med Sci, Clin Res Inst, Patient Safety Res Ctr, Orumiyeh, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Iranian Tissue Bank & Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[5] Qom Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Family & Community Med, Epidemiol, Qom, Iran
[6] Qom Univ Med Sci, Shahid Beheshti Hosp, Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Qom, Iran
[7] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Anesthesiol Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
GI endoscopy; sedation; patient satisfaction; magnesium sulfate; ketamine; midazolam; propofol; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; MODERATE SEDATION; COMBINATION; MIDAZOLAM; FENTANYL; OPIOIDS; SAFETY;
D O I
10.2174/1871527321666220831093652
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background Endoscopy provides valuable diagnostic information and intervention therapies for gastroenterologists. Therefore, various drugs have been used to induce sedation in patients undergoing endoscopy, whereas none have been considered preferred by endoscopists. In the current study, we decided to use the combination of magnesium sulfate, ketamine, and their synergistic effects for creating partial analgesia to increase the satisfaction of endoscopists and patients. Methods This study is a Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial that investigates the sedative effect of ketamine, magnesium sulfate, and propofol in endoscopy. Patients were selected from individuals over 12 years old and with American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) physical status I or II. The study was performed on 210 patients classified as ASA (I have no underlying disease) or II (with underlying controlled disease). The whole group was relieved of pain through sedation according to Ramsay criteria, satisfaction with the operation, duration, recovery, nausea and vomiting, hypotension, and decreased oxygen saturation were compared. Results A total of 155 patients were enrolled in our study, including 51 patients (midazolam and propofol), 55 patients (midazolam and ketamine), and 49 patients (midazolam and ketamine and magnesium). The results showed that preoperative heart rate, intraoperative systolic blood pressure, intraoperative diastolic blood pressure, postoperative heart rate, postoperative systolic blood pressure, and postoperative heart rate were significantly different between the groups. Conclusion The satisfaction of the endoscopic was achieved to a great extent, mainly in the group receiving midazolam and propofol and in the group receiving midazolam and ketamine. In most cases, the satisfaction of the endoscopic was acceptable, and the low satisfaction of the endoscopic was more in the group receiving midazolam. Ketamine and magnesium were observed. The two compounds midazolam-ketamine, and midazolam-propofol, have a more favorable effect than the combination of midazolam, ketamine, and magnesium.
引用
收藏
页码:1259 / 1266
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy and safety comparison of esketamine-propofol with nalbuphine-propofol for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in children: a multi-center randomized controlled trial
    Zheng, Xiaosu
    Huang, Jinjin
    Wei, Sisi
    Tao, Yingying
    Shen, Yang
    Wang, Yanting
    He, Pan
    Zhang, Mazhong
    Sun, Ying
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2023, 11
  • [32] Effect of remimazolam vs propofol in high-risk patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
    Li, Zhi
    Yuan, Daming
    Yu, Yu
    Xu, Jie
    Yang, Weili
    Chen, Li
    Luo, Nanbo
    TRIALS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [33] Etomidate versus propofol sedation for complex upper endoscopic procedures: a prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Kim, Mi Gang
    Park, Se Woo
    Kim, Jae Hyun
    Lee, Jin
    Kae, Sea Hyub
    Jang, Hyun Joo
    Koh, Dong Hee
    Choi, Min Ho
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 86 (03) : 452 - 461
  • [34] The relationship between the Bispectral Index (BIS) and the Observer Alertness of Sedation Scale (OASS) scores during propofol sedation with and without ketamine: a randomized, double blinded, placebo controlled clinical trial
    De Oliveira, Gildasio S., Jr.
    Kendall, Mark C.
    Marcus, R-Jay
    McCarthy, Robert J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2016, 30 (04) : 495 - 501
  • [35] Propofol-Ketamine vs. Propofol-Fentanyl Combinations in Patients Undergoing Closed Reduction: A Randomized, Double-blind, Clinical Trial
    Mofidi, Mani
    Rouhi, Roghayeh
    Mahshidfar, Babak
    Abbasi, Saeed
    Hafezimoghadam, Peyman
    Rezai, Mahdi
    Farsi, Davood
    ADVANCED JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 2 (04)
  • [36] Comparison of the Sedative, Hemodynamic, and Anesthetic Effect of Dexmedetomidine, Ketamine, and Etomidate on Cataract Surgery by Phacoemulsification Method: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Moghisseh, Bardia
    Modir, Hesameddin
    Moshiri, Esmail
    Motaghinia, Zahra
    Bozorgmanesh, Mohammadreza
    JOURNAL OF CURRENT OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 34 (04): : 414 - 420
  • [37] Comparison of Intravenous Sedation with Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Breast Cancer Skin Lesion Electrochemotherapy: A Randomized, Double-blinded Clinical Trial
    Tahvildari, Azin
    Behnaz, Faranak
    Faresani, Hamidreza Azizi
    Asgari, Sogol
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER MANAGEMENT, 2025, 18 (01)
  • [38] The propofol-sparing effect of intravenous lidocaine in elderly patients undergoing colonoscopy: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled study
    Mengmeng Chen
    Yi Lu
    Haoran Liu
    Qingxia Fu
    Jun Li
    Junzheng Wu
    Wangning Shangguan
    BMC Anesthesiology, 20
  • [39] Comparative evaluation of dexmedetomidine and midazolam-ketamine combination as sedative agents in pediatric dentistry: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Malhotra, Parul Uppal
    Thakur, Seema
    Singhal, Parul
    Chauhan, Deepak
    Jayam, Cheranjeevi
    Sood, Ritu
    Malhotra, Yagyeshwar
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2016, 7 (02) : 186 - 192
  • [40] Comparison of Remimazolam and Propofol in Recovery of Elderly Outpatients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial
    Lu, Lin
    Chen, Bing
    Zhao, Xueli
    Zhai, Jie
    Zhang, Pan
    Hua, Zhen
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2024, 18 : 4307 - 4318