Assessing the ecosystem services and disservices provided by migratory wildlife across the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem

被引:2
|
作者
Maher, Samantha M. L. [1 ,3 ,5 ]
Barker, Kristin J. [1 ]
Kroetz, Kailin [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Butsic, Van [1 ]
Leonard, Bryan [2 ,3 ]
Middleton, Arthur D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, Berkeley, CA USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, Tempe, AZ USA
[3] Property & Environm Resource Ctr, Bozeman, MT USA
[4] Resources Future Inc, Washington, DC USA
[5] 130 Hilgard Way, Berkeley, CA 94709 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Ecosystem services; Disservices; Migration; Wildlife; Private lands; SOIL-NITROGEN; ELK; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; PATTERNS; VALUES; BRUCELLOSIS; FRAMEWORK; KNOWLEDGE; DAMAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110090
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Highly mobile and migratory wildlife are ecologically, culturally, and economically important because they provide ecosystem services across heterogenous landscapes. Migratory ungulates (hoofed mammals) are particularly influential because of their large body size, seasonal movement across vast distances, and ties to human society. Ungulate migrations are widely declining in the face of habitat alteration, and initiatives across the globe seek to conserve them. However, migratory herds can generate significant costs or disservices for landowners and communities, complicating management and conservation. We demonstrate how a compre-hensive assessment of the ecosystem services and disservices (ESDs) provided by mobile wildlife can enable conservation policy that facilitates co-existence across multi-use landscapes. Our mixed-methods approach ap-plies the widely recognized Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) ESD categories as a framework to combine formal scientific knowledge spanning multiple disciplines with experiential knowledge gathered from local stakeholders through interviews. We apply this methodology in the context of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE), which harbors long-distance migrations of six ungulate species that move between public protected areas and private working lands. We discuss how stakeholder knowledge corroborates or contradicts scientific literature and characterize stakeholder groups and their per-spectives. We suggest that formal assessments of ESDs within their ecological and socioeconomic contexts could mobilize resources for conservation, increase returns on conservation spending, and support conflict resolution amongst groups seeking to manage wildlife for different objectives.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Global assessment of ecosystem services and disservices associated with owls
    Formoso, Anahi E.
    Plaza, Pablo
    Lambertucci, Sergio A.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2025, 72
  • [42] From food to pest: Conversion factors determine switches between ecosystem services and disservices
    Rasmussen, Laura Vang
    Christensen, Andreas E.
    Danielsen, Finn
    Dawson, Neil
    Martin, Adrian
    Mertz, Ole
    Sikor, Thomas
    Thongmanivong, Sithong
    Xaydongvanh, Pheang
    AMBIO, 2017, 46 (02) : 173 - 183
  • [43] Experimental evidence of multiple ecosystem services and disservices provided by ecological intensification in Mediterranean agro-ecosystems
    Segre, Hila
    Segoli, Michal
    Carmel, Yohay
    Shwartz, Assaf
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2020, 57 (10) : 2041 - 2053
  • [44] Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level
    Plieninger, Tobias
    Dijks, Sebastian
    Oteros-Rozas, Elisa
    Bieling, Claudia
    LAND USE POLICY, 2013, 33 : 118 - 129
  • [45] Ecosystem services and disservices associated with vultures: A systematic review and evidence assessment
    Carucci, Tomaso
    Whitehouse-Tedd, Katherine
    Yarnell, Richard W.
    Collins, Alan
    Fitzpatrick, Fran
    Botha, Andre
    Santangeli, Andrea
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2022, 56
  • [46] ATTITUDES AND KNOWLEDGE OF PEOPLE LIVING IN THE GREATER YELLOWSTONE ECOSYSTEM
    READING, RP
    CLARK, TW
    KELLERT, SR
    SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 1994, 7 (04) : 349 - 365
  • [47] ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT - A COMPARISON OF GREATER YELLOWSTONE AND GEORGES BANK
    BURROUGHS, RH
    CLARK, TW
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1995, 19 (05) : 649 - 663
  • [48] Ecosystem services provided by Neotropical birds
    Michel, Nicole L.
    Whelan, Christopher J.
    Verutes, Gregory M.
    CONDOR, 2020, 122 (03):
  • [49] Lead exposure in large carnivores in the greater Yellowstone ecosystem
    Rogers, Thomas A.
    Bedrosian, Bryan
    Graham, Jon
    Foresman, Kerry R.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 76 (03) : 575 - 582
  • [50] Assessing ecosystem services from multifunctional trees in pastures using Bayesian belief networks
    Barton, David N.
    Benjamin, Tamara
    Cerdan, Carlos R.
    DeClerck, Fabrice
    Madsen, Anders L.
    Rusch, Graciela M.
    Salazar, Alvaro G.
    Sanchez, Dalia
    Villanueva, Cristobal
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2016, 18 : 165 - 174