Assessing the ecosystem services and disservices provided by migratory wildlife across the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem

被引:2
|
作者
Maher, Samantha M. L. [1 ,3 ,5 ]
Barker, Kristin J. [1 ]
Kroetz, Kailin [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Butsic, Van [1 ]
Leonard, Bryan [2 ,3 ]
Middleton, Arthur D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, Berkeley, CA USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, Tempe, AZ USA
[3] Property & Environm Resource Ctr, Bozeman, MT USA
[4] Resources Future Inc, Washington, DC USA
[5] 130 Hilgard Way, Berkeley, CA 94709 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Ecosystem services; Disservices; Migration; Wildlife; Private lands; SOIL-NITROGEN; ELK; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; PATTERNS; VALUES; BRUCELLOSIS; FRAMEWORK; KNOWLEDGE; DAMAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110090
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Highly mobile and migratory wildlife are ecologically, culturally, and economically important because they provide ecosystem services across heterogenous landscapes. Migratory ungulates (hoofed mammals) are particularly influential because of their large body size, seasonal movement across vast distances, and ties to human society. Ungulate migrations are widely declining in the face of habitat alteration, and initiatives across the globe seek to conserve them. However, migratory herds can generate significant costs or disservices for landowners and communities, complicating management and conservation. We demonstrate how a compre-hensive assessment of the ecosystem services and disservices (ESDs) provided by mobile wildlife can enable conservation policy that facilitates co-existence across multi-use landscapes. Our mixed-methods approach ap-plies the widely recognized Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) ESD categories as a framework to combine formal scientific knowledge spanning multiple disciplines with experiential knowledge gathered from local stakeholders through interviews. We apply this methodology in the context of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE), which harbors long-distance migrations of six ungulate species that move between public protected areas and private working lands. We discuss how stakeholder knowledge corroborates or contradicts scientific literature and characterize stakeholder groups and their per-spectives. We suggest that formal assessments of ESDs within their ecological and socioeconomic contexts could mobilize resources for conservation, increase returns on conservation spending, and support conflict resolution amongst groups seeking to manage wildlife for different objectives.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Perceptions of ecosystem services provided by tropical forests to local populations in Cameroon
    Lhoest, Simon
    Dufrene, Marc
    Vermeulen, Cedric
    Oszwald, Johan
    Doucet, Jean-Louis
    Fayolle, Adeline
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 38
  • [22] Ecosystem services and disservices provided by small rodents in arable fields: Effects of local and landscape management
    Fischer, Christina
    Gayer, Christoph
    Kurucz, Kornelia
    Riesch, Friederike
    Tscharntke, Teja
    Batary, Peter
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2018, 55 (02) : 548 - 558
  • [23] Forage senescence and disease influence elk pregnancy across the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
    Bidder, Owen R.
    Connor, Thomas
    Morales, Juan M.
    Rickbeil, Gregory J. M.
    Merkle, Jerod A.
    Fuda, Rebecca K.
    Rogerson, Jared D.
    Scurlock, Brandon M.
    Edwards, William H.
    Cole, Eric K.
    Mcwhirter, Douglas E.
    Courtemanch, Alyson B.
    Dewey, Sarah
    Kauffman, Matthew J.
    MacNulty, Daniel R.
    du Toit, Johan T.
    Stahler, Daniel R.
    Middleton, Arthur D.
    ECOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (12):
  • [24] Social and ecological factors on the perception of cultural ecosystem services and disservices: Insights from Shanghai, China
    Su, Rongfei
    Ye, Shiyu
    Yu, Linlin
    Wu, Jingbin
    Kang, Yan
    Chen, Ruishan
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2025, 259
  • [25] Iconic manakins and despicable grackles: Comparing cultural ecosystem services and disservices across stakeholders in Costa Rica
    Echeverri, Alejandra
    Naidoo, Robin
    Karp, Daniel S.
    Chan, Kai M. A.
    Zhao, Jiaying
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 106
  • [26] Ecosystem services provided by birds
    Whelan, Christopher J.
    Wenny, Daniel G.
    Marquis, Robert J.
    YEAR IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2008, 2008, 1134 : 25 - 60
  • [27] Assessing impacts of intensified biomass production and biodiversity protection on ecosystem services provided by European forests
    Verkerk, P. J.
    Mavsar, R.
    Giergiczny, M.
    Lindner, M.
    Edwards, D.
    Schelhaas, M. J.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 9 : 155 - 165
  • [28] Ecosystem services provided by waterbirds
    Green, Andy J.
    Elmberg, Johan
    BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2014, 89 (01) : 105 - 122
  • [29] Ecosystem Services and Disservices of Mangrove Forests: Insights from Historical Colonial Observations
    Friess, Daniel A.
    FORESTS, 2016, 7 (09)
  • [30] ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND DISSERVICES OF MANGROVE FORESTS AND SALT MARSHES
    Friess, Daniel A.
    Yando, Erik S.
    Alemu, Jahson B., I
    Wong, Lynn-Wei
    Soto, Sasha D.
    Bhatia, Natasha
    OCEANOGRAPHY AND MARINE BIOLOGY: AN ANNUAL REVIEW, VOL 58, 2020, 58 : 107 - 141